Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now

Tuesday 30 October 2012

KiwiLaw Advocates Ltd, and Ms Cherie (Whatever her last name is?) of NARK

The Day Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd- Ms Cheryl Simes, first posted on our Facebook page: 

Also reposting on our Facebook page for the NZ Public's News Feed:

Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd
Enough is enough. Cherie has already answered her critics - see below - and yet you continue to harass her. We have been asked to advise her. We do not want to issue proceedings for defamation but we have advised her to consider this, if necessary. Ongoing harassment is also a criminal offence, in some circumstances.
If anyone has genuine concerns, they are invited to contact our offices with the details.
http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/nark-falsely-accused/5/116666


Nark 'falsely accused' | Voxy.co.nz
www.voxy.co.nz
Nark wishes to clarify that concerns about financial management of the group, soon to file for charitable status are unfounded. Rumors of scamming stem from teething problems within the group that came to a head with a walk out by one faction of volunteers but no monies are unaccounted for.
Like ·  ·  · 19 October 2012 at 15:43
  • 2 people like this.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Can you confirm whether or not an audit has been done. This is a genuine question and certainly not harassment or defamation.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Please do not threaten the Public of NZ, this is not acceptable. We all have very major concerns regarding this entire issue of the missing and non countability of monies the NZ Public have given towards her fake Charity. Questions for KIWI LAW ADVOCATES LTD: Is it a legal entity now? Is there an IRD number for the NARK Account yet? Do you have the Charity Registration Number that NARK is suppose to have? Did you know that she is a well trained business women and also that she knows how to do book keeping? Why hadn't she done that when monies were first coming in? What about the Trust Account she had said she would set up, when the moines started coming in? Where did that money go? Were is the accountability back then? We will NOT be moved by your threats of defamation, or talk of harassment and criminal offences. There is certainly nothing criminal in wanting the proven answers of what many people of NZ require and had given so much to a cause that, have not given any proof's of where the monies have gone too. Unless she can prove all the answers we have provided for her (including copied proof of receipts, bank statements and "all" monies etc...that were received to her and her Org) We REFUSE to believe hearsay or take her at her word, you should know that being a legal entity yourself, so therefore we will REMAIN and keep NZ informed on this Sham Charity/Trust/ Org. You have nothing to go on legally, so please take your threats elsewhere. Just a quick point too: She says we have no proof of these allegations regarding missing monies etc, WE say show us the proof that we are wrong!! We will remain online and WE will keep all of NZ informed regarding this "Sham" Org, until we get the clarification and legal documentation (NOT TYPED UP BITS OF PAPER LOL) that the NZ Public require, Thank You.
  • Lovelee Leigh what a laugh .. hhaaaa most of the public have forgotten her name its only those who really care about the whereabouts of charity moneys who are still wanting these answers. The fact that there are no answers after nearly a year tells us she is a scammer and a bullshitter.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Seems she must be craving the limelight and maybe in need of money yet again perhaps. The NZ Public will not pay for her to galavant around NZ, or pay for her to attend hui's (which are way overpriced) also we will not pay for her to get into the media spotlight again for doing nothing. One more question KIWI LAW ADVOCATE LTD: What child has been helped or benefited from her fake Charity/Org/Trust etc? Less hui and more Do-i is what is required. A facebook page displaying abused children that she has included in her fake Charity to make money for herself is quite disturbing. Posting links on her facebook page is not helping the Child Abuse issue in NZ, tell Ms Cherie, KIWI LAW ADVOCATE LTD, that NZ are not gullible and she will be opposed for want of more money and for want of spotlight attention. Ms Cherie (Whatever your last name is) The Child Abuse Issue is NOT all about you, please stop playing the victim card, it is very tiring. Also please keep your gang colours out of the spotlight. Its disgraceful. Kia Ora!!
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd There is no legal requirement for a charity to be a separate legal entity. For instance, you have probably seen publicity about the Franklin Zoo trust which funded the Franklin Zoo and is paying for the care of the elephant that killed Dr Helen Schofield. That trust is not a separate legal entity although it is run as a charitable trust. Registration with the Charities Commission is not compulsory.
    A few seconds ago · Like..
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Would you consider it an appropriate use of NARK funds to pay for an audit? If not, how do you think this might be achieved? Audits cost money.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd We are aware that Cherie has had multiple stressors in her life over the last 24 months, some of which are directly related to the personal attacks made on her in social media - for instance, allegations that she and her husband are current Mongrel Mob members. Simply untrue, and also dangerous given that Ngaruawahia has strong Black Power connections. (Yours is not the only site which has contained highly negative postings about Cherie and her family.) We are also aware from our own experience (see Kiwilaw Advocates page) that allegations of wrongdoing and unprofessional conduct can sap one's energy and ability to do anything very much - especially when it is also suggested that one's efforts were worthless or even harmful. A year or two can quickly pass without some of the 'normal' things being done, because of the effects of stress. So, although you may genuinely feel there has been a lack of information, we would suggest that patience and more positive engagement would be helpful.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd As to the merits of NARK, our understanding is that the essence of Cherie's concern is to encourage New Zealanders to report suspected child abuse and to develop an attitude of non-tolerance towards child abuse. That would seem to be worthwhile in its own right. Whether this develops into broader abuse-prevention measures will be something for NARK's executive to consider in due course. My understanding is that a constitution is being drafted for NARK. The exact purposes will need to be checked against the legal meaning of 'charitable' but, on the face of it, NARK seems to us to have legitimate charitable purposes.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Finally, we would suggest that frustration and fear all too easily lead to bullying and abusive confrontation. Would it not be more helpful to model respectful and compassionate modes of communication? The more New Zealanders who engage in positive communication, the greater the influence on those who have not yet learnt those skills. Between us, we can demonstrate that there are respectful ways to address disputes, and that abusive confrontation is unnecessary and unhelpful. (Oh, and if anyone genuinely believes they have been 'scammed', take it to the police. Otherwise, let's work together - so some can get NARK on track, and others at least cease throwing rocks to cause a derailment.)
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? The derailment was caused by Cherie in the first place with her refusal to answer genuine concerns regarding monies etc. When people donate precious time and hard earned money they have a right to ask questions and a greater right to receive a response. To be continually given excuses as to why no information is forthcoming tests ones patience which is exactly what happened with regards NARK.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd See 'multiple stressors' comment above. Plus human psychology, namely that a demand (e.g. for information) produces resistance and defensiveness. (We know - we have been there ourselves, with the Legal Services Agency and the law society.) That resistance and defensiveness in turn reinforces the initial assumptions and concerns - this is an aspect of 'confirmatory bias'. By the time the factual explanations are provided, the accusers can no longer hear or evaluate them - because unconscious 'confirmatory bias' leads the accusers only to see what they expect to see. (In our case, the Legal Services Agency decision-makers did not 'see' that preparation of a specific affidavit had indeed been supervised, despite our providing a copy of the draft affidavit with the supervisor's handwritten comments and questions! At the time, this seemed malicious oversight; in fact, it was probably the result of confirmatory bias.) Then 'positions' intensify. What's worse, people tend to believe that others are subject to bias but that they themselves can resist it. This is incorrect. Part of the answer can be to involve a third party who can help identify the real issus and work towards a resolution that meets everyone's needs. Once things calm down, and effective and respectful communication is restored, that third party may no longer be needed. We are hoping that this Page will encourage respectful and positive communication. We also suggest that we discuss your concerns with Cherie and provide an update by the end of November.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd We understand that NARK's registration has now been started with the Department of Internal Affairs (successor to the Charities Commission) and the reference number is NAR1456.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Has an audit been done, as promised by Cherie and friends, for the 2011/2012 financial year.
  • Cheryl Simes Not yet. That is part of what we would propose to update by the end of November - as in our comment above. (Do you know of any qualified auditors who would be available without charge?)
  • Cheryl Simes Charities registration application number is 42156. NB this is only the start of the process and Cherie will next provide the further documentation required for registration.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? We will be waiting in anticipation  However Cheryl, you really need to read our blog which will give you more insight into "allegations" of them being in the Mongrel Mob, Mr Sweeney has admitted this himself that they are. Have you seen their recent picture of his dressed up Mongrel Mob outfit along with gun in hand and Nazi signs? What about Cherie's kids having to see that? That is abuse in itself. You really need to do your research MsCheryl Simes Thankyou.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Mike and Cherie have already provided us with information about this. However, we want to double-check my understanding, before we comment publicly. It will probably be Thursday before we can do this. In the meantime, be aware that 'past' involvement is not the same as 'current' involvement. You may also wish to note that - if you are sued for defamation - you have the job of proving that your statements or innuendos are true. Cherie and Mike do not have to disprove the allegations. And harassment is even wider, and can cover 'true' information if it is misused. You may wish to consider withdrawing some of your public postings in the meantime - as an indication of good faith. At least at this stage, that is entirely up to you.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Oops, we meant 'double-check our understanding'. You knew that. It's confusing, trying to remember the right jargon, as well as trying to remember to use Facebook as the Page (Kiwilaw) instead of as Cheryl personally.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? You will need to provide under what act law in NZ, should we be sued under. See the people of NZ have the right to freedom of speech and yes they are certainly Mongrel Mob members, we have the proof. Cheryl what you don't seem to understand is that Nark is now irrelevant, (no one trusts giving money to her Org), many people will not contribute to something that has done nothing in helping this serious problem in NZ, which is the Child Abuse Issue. I ask again at what point during her making money through her Org has she helped a or any child directly?
  • Cheryl Simes I suggest you obtain your own legal advice - maybe through a community law centre, if you prefer not to pay a private lawyer. The right to freedom of speech has some limits to it - and those limits include defamation, harassment, breach of privacy, etc.
  • Cheryl Simes If you consider that NARK is irrelevant, why keep your website and blog? I don't understand. Or do you think that people might start to trust NARK again, if they didn't have your website and blog etc to refer to?
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Cheryl why do you keep commenting on here. I find it strange considering your views. Each time you comment it gives us the right of reply which in turn keeps this page in the public eye.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd This page is in the public eye as long as it is on Facebook. Its contents are problematical. We are hoping to address those problems by using communication. We also hope that you will choose to rectify the problems in a good-faith manner, if you see that the issues you have raised (a) are being answered, or (b) are factually incorrect; or (c) convey a mistaken impression because other facts are not stated.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd The 'Mongrel Mob' connection is an example of (b) and (c) above. I understand from Mike Sweeney that he is a former Mongrel Mob member. For many years now, he has had no active involvement in the gang. Most recently he helps on a voluntary basis as a mentor and drug counsellor at a government-funded drug rehabilitation facility run jointly by the Mongrel Mob and the Salvation Army Bridge programme. As he describes it, this is an attempt 'to cure the gang from the inside out'.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Oh, and the photo you refer to above ('dressed up in Mongrel Mob outfit with gun in hand and Nazi signs') - Mike accepts that it was a spoof that went wrong. It was not 'recent' - it was before he met Cherie. And it was not a Mongrel Mob outfit. When Tame Iti and friends were raided by armed police etc, Mike dressed up and staged the photo, with props he bought on Trade Me. There is a sign at the front of the full photo, 'Tame Iti we support you.' It was intended as a private spoof against 'white power'. Perhaps you could think of it as an example of 'freedom of expression'.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? We understand how you twist the truth, this is your job I guess, but we have proof which contradicts what you are saying, yet again. There are some things we haven't posted (being it is be delicate of nature) on this issue. We will however, have it at the ready should legal proceedings occur as the NZ Public have the right to be aware and also keeping in mind the NZ Press would certainly have a field day themselves.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd If you have information that you believe supports your allegations, we would like to see it, so that we can advise Mike and Cherie appropriately. Please send it to Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd, P O Box 4265, Hamilton East, Hamilton 3247. Or email to kiwilaw.cheryl@gmail.com. Please treat this as a request for personal information under the Privacy Act. The request is made by us as Mike and Cherie Sweeney's agent. (If you need confirmation of our authority to make this request, let us know and we shall provide an authority form.) You will probably be aware that, under the Privacy Act, you are required to provide this information within a reasonable time and no longer than 20 working days. Thank you for your assistance in this - it is always preferable to try to resolve issues without Court proceedings if at all possible.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Can you confirm that Sweeney is Cheries legal surname.
  • Cheryl Simes Cherie is in a de facto relationship with Mike Sweeney and they are intending to get married. She is entitled to use that surname if she chooses to. She chooses to do so, especially in public. (People are legally allowed to use more than one name - many of my friends used their maiden name for professional purposes and their married name for family and private purposes. I opted to use my married name for both, which was less complicated. Nowadays some opt to continue using their maiden name after marriage. It has always been common for a common-law 'wife' to use her partner's surname.) Is there some particular issue about this?
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Totally understand the reasons re surnames. I asked due the Sweeney family stating at one stage she was not entitled to use the name.
  • Cheryl Simes My understanding is that some of the family incorrectly interpreted her offers of assistance about a property issue as being an attempt to acquire a share in that property herself, whereas she was intending merely to help them pursue their claim (not seek anything for herself). That may be part of that background. Family issues really should be kept within families, not bandied around on Facebook, don't you think? The same goes for private photos that may have been provided to you by the same family members....
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? I agree with your comment however its up to each individual as to how they use FB. The same applies to photos etc, once posted on utube etc they do become public property.
  • Tracy Kaymaree Sweeney thanku 2 kiwilaw advocate finally someone is there 4 aunty cherie,hopefully more people r reading wat u say.its really embaressing watching this public fight between our family be used by outsiders to drag someones name around facebook find something beta 2 do idiots...and yes i am a sweeney by blood.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd It's also up to each Page administrator what they allow on their Page. There is a 'delete' option, which the administrator can use. And the administrator can always change their mind about whether the page even exists. Our hope is that the administrator of this Page will choose to take appropriate steps in the light of the discussion we have had. If Tracy is right, a 'family fight' has become mixed up with your genuine concerns and, perhaps, your Page has been Used to promote a fight rather than the truth. Thanks for your honesty to date.
  • Stan Redd We are not interested in family feuds of what family Ms Cherie decides she wants to use in the media or other. However, she had mentioned on our other page to some of the Sweeney family, that her and Mr Sweeney were very much married? Another lie, yet again. Can Cherie (what ever her last name is) please tell the truth? Now, what we are interested in is, the answers and proof from our questions that we have posted and also what money is now left in the "Nark" Account, if there is any? If so, shouldn't that be used for the audit? This will help relieve much suspicion with the NZ Public, involving Cherie and her "fake" and yes I do highlight "fake" Charity, Org, Trust or other she prefers to use to bring in money. In regards to genuine concern, we certainly wouldn't be here for the sake of it. We are entitled to answers which are on our blog and in our notes page here. We will keep waiting in anticipation, as we have previously stated, we do not go by hearsay. Thank you.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd My understanding is that (a) the money donated via 'Give a little' website is untouched; (b) any expenditure of other funds has been approved by the NARK board and has been for appropriate purposes. Now, you would like proof of this? Fine. As we said above, give us until the end of November to provide an update - including appropriate statements of account. In our opinion it would be a waste of NARK funds to use NARK funds to pay for a professional audit. There is no legal requirement for this as part of a charity's operations. If you want a professional audit, we suggest that you fund it. (If the audit reveals any malpractice, we - Kiwilaw - will refund that cost to you.) Otherwise, we have suggested to Cherie that she try to find a qualified accountant who is willing to do an audit without being paid.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd How about this? - By the end of November, an update on the accounts will be posted on NARK's Facebook page, including statements of account and information on whether an auditor has been found. In the meantime, you would withdraw this Page and the associated Blog - as a sign of good faith, and to avoid the distraction of possible legal action etc (which nobody needs). If you want to speed up the audit process, you can fund a professional audit, on the basis that Kiwilaw will refund that cost if the audit reveals any malpractice.
  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue "Kiwilaw Advocates" indeed! This is BLACKMAIL - are you assisting Cherie pro bono or what?! How many hours have you spent on her "work"? - How about refunding all the money to the people who ordered tshirts - we don't need an audit to see the frauds - they are plain as day and the EVIDENCE is clear! The money was taken as payment for tshirts - NOT given as "donations" to Cherie Kururangi's FICTITIOUS "charity" - like the fraud over the mortgage money! THe money was fraudulently obtained by the deceptions which included the lie that NARK was a "charitable trust"! "the NARK board" indeed - MORE bullshit - a fancy name for CHerie and her rip off expert aunty Roberta! Cherie is a professional rip off artist and a narcissistic attention seeker - she needs to take responsibility for the death of her own son and keep her thieving nose out of other people's business! - Who are "Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd" and who's paying you to threaten and blackmail people on her behalf!? Cherie Sweeney is a THIEF and a LIAR!
  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue "It has always been common for a common-law 'wife' to use her partner's surname." What UTTER BULLSHIT! What kind of lawyer are you?! Please state full names and qualifications of the "lawyers" involved with "Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd!!!
  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue "If you consider that NARK is irrelevant, why keep your website and blog?" - Because Cherie Kara/Kurarangi is a PROFESSIONAL BLUDGER who seems to be in the business of using at risk kids to line her own pockets and promote her personal profile in an extremely deceitful manner - repeatedly! Tell your mate to get a REAL job and stop bludging and ripping vulnerable and naive people off!
  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue Who owns what she referred to as her house on the Trade Me plea? - Whose name is the mortgage she referred to in?
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Katherine, information about Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd is on our Page (and also out-of-date website). For the time being we are assisting Mike and Cherie pro bono. That is because we consider the abusive attacks on them to be unwarranted and we consider it worth while to help NARK get on the right footing. You may not have heard the saying, 'When the unrighteous are persecuting the righteous, God is on the side of the righteous. When the righteous are persecuting the unrighteous, God is on the side of the unrighteous. God is always on the side of the persecuted.' We are not God. However, like God, we are on the side of the persecuted.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd T-shirt orders will be shown as part of the accounts. Any refunds that have not already been made will be made. (My understanding is that refunds have already been made, but I am making that statement in case any have been missed.) I have seen the documentation about the T-shirt fiasco and the misrepresentations that were made TO Cherie about that.
  • Anya Raupunga Hi there Kiwilaw about time theze guys got their fact right and so glad someone is doing it in a way that is reel professonal
  • Anya Raupunga Will Pm you info I have to if thats k
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Cheryl Simes are you religious? Who do you consider to be righteous, and unrighteous? As you say and this one thing you say is true, we are not God. You forget that wickedness are exposed eventually. They are known by their fruits. You are blind to what is before you, you abide by the law of man. Only God judges, if you are a christian you should know this.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd If only God judges, and if you are not God, why are you judging Cherie and Mike? In Jesus's day, the 'righteous' (pharisees etc) judged Jesus and his disciples because (among other things) they associated with sinners. Today you are judging Cherie and Mike, partly because they associate with sinners in the Mongrel Mob (to help them find a new way of life) instead of washing their hands of them and turning their backs on them. Cherie and Mike show courage and commitment that goes well beyond the norm. Are you yourselves so perfect that you are entitled to 'throw the first stone'?
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? If you wish to speak of religious matters, it is best Cheryl Simes to speck from your own page. As we have said only God judges, their true, intentions will be exposed when the light shines on them. Why do you not answer our questions that we are asking? Again, who do you deem righteous? Are you not judging us by what you think is righteous to you? You are not God either lets remember that, Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. From the beginning Ms Cherie continues to lie, she has bullied the public for want of answers, she has tried to hide who she is and what her true intentions are. She has attacked anyone and everyone who has opposed her, on their own facebook pages, she has also hidden behind her partners fb page to speak on behalf of him. Are these the people of righteousness? You are blind Cheryl, these the people you deem have courage and committed? Let me relieve you Cheryl, this is God's teachings and not what YOU deem righteous. " Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits, whether they be of God". And again "You will know them by their fruits". See God is in this, he has always been. Cheryl "do not lean on your own understanding, but Trust in the Lord with all your heart. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths." Now we the NZ Public are here to have our answers with proof that we have been waiting for. We will not be moved, bullied, threatened or other. Ms Cherie has no accounted for any of the monies that have come in from her fake Charity, she continues to adorn herself in her gang colours when in the media, she has disrespected the NZ Public even after they gave from their hearts to help the cause. Yet she is wanting more, attention, want of more money, again go back and ask her what child has she helped directly in her cause?
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Oh here is a letter Ms Cherie sent to some of the Sweeney Family accusing the sister of her partner and that Ms Sweeney declared she was married to Wavee:

    Cheries Letter as follows:

    It has been brought to my attention from an online informant that Witchy Sweeney aka Caroline Sweeney has and is part of an orchestrated attack on me and my campaign Nark.

    For what exactly I am unsure as I have never committed any negative post or the like towards or against her.

    To be clear I married Uncle Last year it wasn't a big ceremony as we could not afford and at the time Uncle felt that Family were not supportive of us, this is misread as I know you all love your uncle dearly. The Sweeney name is mine by Law.

    I do not feel that I am ruining it at all and have everything well documented, merely I am just being attacked for no other reason than that a small group of "haters as I termed them and due to carolines posts today and the informants information of confirming her involvement I thought it best to advise you Legal action will be sourced against her. Not just for me but for the sanctity of my organisation and its credibility being ruined.
    http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/nark-falsely-accused/5/116666

    My family are distraught of the crazy accusations trying to say that I killed my 5year old son.

    This group are also responsible for the Hate the Sweeneys threads that began with Joanies posts wherein after that they hunted every Sweeney they could find on Sensible Sentencing Trust in an effort to gossip about you all and instead they just caused harm to the Sweeneys they did find.

    I apologise to you all that this has been dragged through excessiveness. But it is a kindly reminder to keep your own facebooks safe, as the anti group will stop at nothing.

    Some of these haters are regular Macsyna King Book boycotters and are well practised at attacking people. Sad but True.

    You may feel you do not need to know this BUT others may feel different at the information here especially those named in the hate posts. Regardless the evidence speaks for itself.

    Cherie Sweeney

    Nark 'falsely accused' | Voxy.co.nz
    www.voxy.co.nz
    Nark wishes to clarify that concerns about financial management of the group, so...See more
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd We now have the accounts printouts and statements, but it may be a day or two before we can go through them. I think Cherie has also sent the relevant meeting minutes but she has sent me so many pages I haven't yet looked in detail. (We do have some other work to do!) In the meantime, a Canadian QC has drawn this video to our attention (via LinkedIn) and we think it is so inspirational we would recommend that anyone who cares about anything would find it helpful. http://youtu.be/hVCBrkrFrBE

    TEDxToronto - Drew Dudley "Leading with Lollipops"

    TEDxToronto is the official TEDx conference for Toronto, Canada. In the spirit o...See more
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Thats good news, please post all documents, minutes, statements of accounts here for the Public of NZ to see. Thank you again Kiwi Law, we will be waiting.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd We think it's unlikely that copies of actual documents will be posted online, because of privacy concerns. It's possible that a short summary will be posted. Of course, it is open to you to take up our offer of arranging a full audit as above.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? If they are just typed up documents, we have already had her previous one regarding spending. You and I both know, this is not relevant proof of monies being accumulated and where and when its been spent. Again I need remind you that heresay, word of mouth, or typed up bits of paper are NOT proof. You should know this, as you are meant to be some kind of Lawyer aren't you? Tell her again that is not good enough, as we have been down this road before. If there is monies left in the account, especially that of the Give a Little website for her cause then she will have to arrange an official audit. There is no other way around this. And please KiwiLaw, do not expect the Public of NZ to front up with the money for it. The NZ Public have paid enough for a cause that has done nothing thus far. This is HER Charity, Org, Trust or whatever she likes to call it, and it was HER that refuses to reveal to the public of where monies have gone too. This is HER responsibility to assure the Public Of NZ, that all is accounted for, from its beginnings. Thank you.
  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd If it is posted by us, it will be accurate. (Unless I'm having a bad hair day, in which case the columns may not add up and you will presumably point that out.) In the meantime, we can say that - from the meeting records we have seen so far - it is clear that great efforts were made by everyone concerned to do things the right way, especially as regards financial matters. What did you think of the Drew Dudley video (above)?
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Will have a look at the video tomorrow when free time is available to us, we will leave this for the NZ Public to decide and give them the opportunity to respond and ask questions without attacks, abuse or other etc...(and most importantly this will be in Gods hands) Thank you again Kiwi Law, hopefully there will finally be some closure to this.
  • Parents who are abused by children Ok I have a question if what you have said is true and i say IF why can I not find on the New Zealand charity's register her charity????? Takes 2 seconds to run a search. Since 2011 she has raked in the cash and yet still nothing on the charity's website which by the way in 2011 she claimed to be setting up this trust. So you figure it out !!!!! By the way I know how much work it takes to set one up and it does not take this long!!!!!! So I am waiting and wondering if her charity since its been around since 2011 has even been registered with IRD .....
  • Parents who are abused by children Oh and by the way in order for the charity to not have to pay tax to IRD it does need to be registered with the charities commission..... So now explain to me that one .... Makes me wonder as from what the lawyer and accountant told me and showed me the paper work from IRD and they did request papers from the charity commission ... Or is it this so called Trust is not a public trust but a private one since it is not on the registar?
Admin's reposting on our Facebook page:
Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? shared alink via Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd.
19 October 2012
How lovely, we have had a suprise visitor today NZ!
Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd are threatening the Public of NZ of harassment, defamation or and ongoing harassment that is also a criminal offence LOL, We will not be moved!! We are the PUBLIC OF NZ and WE deserve PROOF.

Message from them below as follows:
Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd5 hours ago ·
Enough is enough. Cherie has already answered her critics - see below - and yet you continue to harass her. We have been asked to advise her. We do not want to issue proceedings for defamation but we have advised her to consider this, if necessary. Ongoing harassment is also a criminal offence, in some circumstances.
If anyone has genuine concerns, they are invited to contact our offices with the details.
4Like ·  · 









Posted by 0 comments
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)