Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now

Tuesday 21 January 2014

Moments in Time: The tactics of Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney Expliots

2009 Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) and Exploitation

From the achieves:

 
In 2009 a documentary was created by TV3 60 minutes regarding girl gangs in Hastings. A huge issue was centred around the filming of the Documentary and also of "alleged" alcohol involvement.
 
No substantial evidence was forthcoming.
 
It was found that the TV3 60 minute documentary did breach privacy laws and not protecting the identities of the girls who's ages were aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16yrs of age. 
 
The full BSA Complaint and final decision can be accessed on the Hastings District Council and TV Works LTD 2009-088 link above.
 
Here is an article also about this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BSA finds girls treated unfairly in gangs item

 
 
A TV3 60 Minutes item on girl gangs in Hawke's Bay did not sufficiently protect the identities of four girls, exploited them and treated them unfairly, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found.
The broadcaster has been ordered to make an on-air apology and pay $6000 costs.
 
Hastings District Council complained about the item, which contained interviews with current and former gang members and was broadcast on April 27 last year.
 
Included in the item were four girls - one aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16 - who were shown wearing gang-style clothing. Two of the girls were shown spray painting graffiti on a basketball court and two were shown re-enacting breaking into a house.
 
The girls were not interviewed but the reporter said they had told her they were drinking and getting into fights.
 
Two of the council's six complaints were upheld, with the authority finding breaches of the privacy and fairness standards.
 
The four girls were shown with their faces covered by bandanas but during the item three of the bandanas slipped, exposing the girls' faces.
The authority said that even if the bandanas had not slipped, it did not agree with the broadcaster that they provided sufficient protection of their identity.
 
"Viewers could see the top half of the girls' faces including their eyes, nose and hair colour. In addition, several full length shots of the girls showed their body shapes and distinctive clothing," the decision said.
 
The three girls under 16 were not old enough to consent to a broadcast that would breach their privacy the decision said and, "there is no evidence to suggest that a parent or guardian consented on their behalf..."
 
In the case of the 16-year-old, there was an understanding with the reporter that her identity would not be revealed and the authority did not find the bandana to be a sufficient disguise.
 
"The authority considers that the broadcaster reneged on an understanding not to reveal the girls' identities, and thereby disclosed private facts in a highly offensive manner about four young girls, three of whom were children," the decision said.
 
On the issue of unfairness, the decision said that the young girls were exposed as participating in criminal and anti-social behaviour when the broadcaster had agreed not to identify them.
The authority found the broadcaster failed to appreciate the harm the item could cause to the reputations and futures of the young girls.
 
"In this respect, the authority is of the view that the broadcast exploited the girls, due to their young age and lack of appreciation for the consequences of their actions, and unnecessarily identified them. It considers that all four girls were treated unfairly."
 
The authority ordered TVWorks Ltd to broadcast a summary of the decision within a month and to pay complainant costs of $3560.12 and Crown costs of $2500.
- NZPA
 
Another article in the 3 News NZ website. Please click in the link.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Mrs Roberta Karangaroa's input on this issue and also that she had "heard"  alcohol was being provided to the girls by the 60 minutes crew during filming.
 
TV team in booze row
   

Television news show 60 Minutes denies allegations it bought alcohol for a group of young Hawke's Bay women interviewed for its story Girls in the Hood which screened on TV3 on Sunday.
 
Instead, the producer of the show said the 60 Minutes team was invited to attend a party and took along a small quantity of alcohol "in the customary way".

Executive producer Terrence Taylor said the party was held by an adult and took place after all the interviews had been completed.

"No other alcohol was given to anyone," he said in written replies to Hawke's Bay Today.

Hastings Mayor Lawrence Yule said he was disappointed with the way the story on girl gangs portrayed Hastings, Napier and in particular Flaxmere.

"I'm just trying to stand up for a part of my community that has been shafted by a journalist from outside the area," he said.

Mr Yule said it had appeared to him the young girls interviewed had been supplied alcohol as a prop for the story. They were filmed drinking a bottle of Johnny Walker whisky.

Today he was meeting Riverslea Community Trust spokeswoman Roberta Karangaroa to talk about their options, which may include a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council.

Ms Karangaroa, who works with youth, said she also had heard a bottle of alcohol had been bought by 60 Minutes and given to the girls to drink while they were filmed for the story.

Mr Yule and Ms Karangaroa were upset the girls had been asked to re-enact a burglary on the show.

Mr Taylor said the girls 60 Minutes interviewed did act out a burglary scene but re-enactments were often used in current affairs shows.

" ... and we are sure that viewers would see from the way it was filmed that this was clearly re-enacted," he said.

Mr Taylor said 60 Minutes did not say there were limited services available to help girls in gangs back on to the straight and narrow.

"A participant in the story, a knowledgeable expert on girl 'crews', suggested that young women are attracted to these groups because they don't receive enough support elsewhere.
This was her honest opinion," he said.

Mr Taylor said the 60 Minutes team did seek comment from the Maori community in the course of researching the story.

"We spoke to a community group, who agreed that girl crews are a problem in the area," he said.

"We stand by the story, which we believe highlighted a serious issue. In the light of the interest that it seems to have created, we are considering returning to do a follow-up," he said.

Obscene language had been displayed on the 60 Minutes website from bloggers leaving comments about the Girls in the Hood story.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here are the paragraphs related to Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) from the BSA  site.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney was known as a fixer (paid as an assistant).  As pointed out, she received $1,000 dollars for this job.  This is something  she had stated last year that, she had done this on a voluntary basis.  Here is her admittance of being involved:



From her post she had said:

"I helped girlgangs that were causing havoc in our communities as I felt that these girls could be helped if pointed in the right direction.   "This was ALL voluntary."

More from our previous post of this is issue here

From the BSA website:

Complainant

[24]   The HDC argued that the programme’s makers had relied on one of the women interviewed to conduct research for the item, including interviewing the mayor and local MPs, but it noted that none of this “research” occurred. It said that the broadcaster had told the HDC that the woman was an assistant producer who owned her own media company, and alleged that she was paid $1,000 for organising the story. The complainant considered the woman to be unreliable and stated that the broadcaster had taken no steps to check what research she had done.

The Broadcasters Response

[43]   Turning to the $1000 payment made to one of the women for organising the story, the broadcaster stated that the woman ran her own company and had worked for the media in the past. It said she was paid as an assistant or “fixer” to introduce the reporter to people in the area. TVWorks considered that the payment was “entirely legitimate” and reasonable considering her knowledge of girl gangs. It stated that another of the women interviewed had been paid $200 plus a small sum of lunch money for her and the other girls being filmed. It said that the woman’s car had been used in several scenes and that the reporter had “filled the tank”.

Authority's Determination

Contracting the “fixer” and the nature of the item overall
[101]   With respect to 60 Minutes’ use of a “fixer”, the Authority is satisfied with TVWorks’ explanation of why it employed a person to make contacts for the reporter so that she could conduct interviews and obtain other material for the story.
 
Why would she again lie about this being voluntary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Former gang girl hits back

 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 She had also stated in this Media article that....

"Cheriek Kara, a mother of two who is working towards her master's degree in Maori and management, featured as a reformed teen gang member on the current affairs show alongside present gang members trying to change their lifestyles."

When asked if she had completed her studies and gained her Masters Degree, nothing was produced.  

This picture was given by a close family member who posted this one of the many pages that Ms Cherie had removed. 

When it comes to exploitation of monies for her "causes" she certainly makes sure to get paid.


Cherie and Michael
  There is more to this story which will be posted in due time.



 

Monday 20 January 2014

"Give a little" donation pages removed

 The two different donation pages of Nark "Give a little":

For those who are unfamiliar with Give a Little here is an overview:

Overview

 
Givealittle is a zero fees fundraising service that is owned and operated by the Telecom Foundation, the charitable foundation of Telecom New Zealand Limited. We operate Givealittle to facilitate online donations from Donors to Fundraising Members who have set up an online fundraising page for a good cause.

More on the Give a little Website here

Give a little is a great way to advertise for donations for a cause etc. But the flipside to it is its also great for Scammers to use too. Please read further.

From the give a little website:


Cause Page
 
Where a User creates a Givealittle Page to raise funds for a Fundraising Beneficiary with the capacity to self register on Givealittle, the Fundraising Beneficiary must be first registered on Givealittle to enable the User to create a page type which enables us to attribute donations directly to the Fundraising Beneficiary.

The first is the Nark Cause: Amount $2,280.00

35 donars



Donations started 12 August 2011



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 















Givealittle  Pages
 
All Users may create a Givealittle Page:

(a) for untagged purpose on behalf of an organisation (profile page)

(b) for a specific purpose on behalf of themselves as either an organisation, group or individual user (cause page)

 (c) to the benefit of another organisation or cause (champion page)

 (d) in association with an organised fundraising event or appeal (event page)

A User must ensure that the Content uploaded to a Givealittle Page does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party (including copyright). Where it does, the User must obtain the owner's written consent to the use of it.

We reserve the right to remove any Content from any Givealittle Page, at our sole discretion and without notice if any intellectual property rights are contested. If you suspect a breach of any intellectual property right on the Website, please email us at
helpdesk@givealittle.co.nz.

Profile Pages

  
Only Users who operate on a not-for-profit basis (whether holding a Registered Charitable Status or not) can create a Givealittle page for untagged donations. You may only register as a User representing an organisation if you can form a legally binding contract that is enforceable against you.

Code of Conduct
 
 
The integrity of the Givealittle service is dependent upon all Users conducting themselves in a responsible and legal manner. Telecom Foundation operates a moderation, approval and verification process in a best effort to ensure all Users and Content complies with standards required for a healthy public giving community.

 Breaches requiring immediate remedy or invoking termination include (but are not limited to):


 (a) An attempt to use the Givealittle service to raise funds for activities or intentions which are directly or indirectly illegal according to New Zealand law;

 (b) Misrepresentation of identify or affiliation with any other person or organisation;

 (c) Using Givealittle to send junk email or "spam" to people contrary to the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007;


 The User covenants in respect of any Content uploaded on the Website that it does not:


 (b) Detrimentally affect the brand or reputation of Givealittle, the Telecom Foundation, Telecom New Zealand Limited, any other User or any affiliates or partners of Telecom Foundation;

 (c) Be misleading as to the nature, type, service, intentions or benefits resulting from donations to the Content;

 (d) Contain inaccurate, ambiguous, exaggerated, defamatory, untrue, or out of date information;

Donor Trust & Confidence 
 
 It is important to note that not all Fundraising Members and Fundraising Beneficiaries on Givealittle are registered New Zealand charities under the Charities Act. We endeavour, through the Telecom Foundation verification process, to identify whether a Fundraising Member or Fundraising Beneficiary has:

(a) Registered Charitable Status; and/ or

(b) Donee Tax Status

(c) A Verified Bank Account.

Undertaking the Telecom Foundation verification is an optional process for Fundraising Members and Fundraising Beneficiaries to increase public trust and confidence in their Givealittle Page.

Givealittle provides Donors with a Donor Confidence Key on all Givealittle Pages where a donate functionality is enable. This key provides Donors with important information collected by the Telecom Foundation to support informed, independent donation decision making by all Users. All reasonable efforts will be taken to ensure that information is accurate when moderated, approved, verified and displayed in the Donor Confidence Key, however no liability shall attach to the Telecom Foundation in the event of mistake or error in the moderation, approval or verification process.

Taxation and Accounting Matters
 
 It is important to note that the Telecom Foundation is not an accounting, taxation or financial adviser for donations, and Users should not rely on any information given on Givealittle to determine the accounting, tax or financial consequences of making a donation or using Givealittle to fundraise.

We strongly recommend that all Users consult with their own adviser(s) about any accounting, taxation or financial consequences. This is particularly important if:

(a) a Donor requires a tax rebate for their donation, in which case the Donor is responsible for verifying the donee status of the Fundraising Member

 (b) a Fundraising Member is establishing a Givealittle Page for their own cause, in which case the Fundraising Member is responsible for any tax associated with any donations (and indemnifies Telecom Foundation from any liability in this regard)

(c) a Fundraising Beneficiary is required to account for or audit all donations raised by third party entities. 

The Give a little Organisation Page
 
 

 
 
1 Donation recorded


Donar Total: $50.00
 
 
Email for removal of void Nark.Org.nz website

 Removal Request Accepted: 16th January 2014
  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination

 We reserve the right to reject any User registration, Givealittle Page or terminate a registered User without cause or any obligation to discuss the matter with that User.

Without limiting this absolute freedom, we may terminate a User if:

(a) a serious complaint is received or a number of complaints (amounting to what we determine as a serious complaint) are received about the User and his/her/its conduct in using the Website;

(b) if the User breaches these Terms;

(c) if you attempt to login as another User other than at the express and constant direction of that User (where the registered User is not capable of logging-in due to a disability); or
if we deem the User's behaviour to be unacceptable (as solely determined by Telecom Foundation).

Users registered more than once without our express consent may have all of their Givealittle registrations cancelled.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So on the 14th of January 2014 this year, we sent the complaint email to the Give a little website , for removal of both pages relating to Nark. Thankfully after our concerns were read, they removed the pages .

Ms Cherie was quite happy to advertise for donations on the "Give a little" site, right up until the 16th of January this year, even though her Org is Non- Existent and had been from the beginning....
 
This would be from June 2011- January 2014
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is from the Article:
 
'Nark' crusader gains fans
Last updated 08:03 22/06/2011
 
Link here: Stuff.co.nz

 A Ngaruawahia woman is fast becoming one of New Zealand's most popular people on Facebook. CHRIS GARD

She may not have made many friends in Ngaruawahia, but more than 10,000 people like Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney on Facebook.

Ms Sweeney has been called a nark for going public on New Zealand's appalling record of child abuse following the death of a neighbouring infant, Serenity Scott-Dinnington, earlier this year. 

But she has turned the ugly label around by turning the initials into an acronym: Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids (Nark).

The group's Facebook page "STOP Death by Abuse of our Children" is liked by 10,241 people, among them politicians including former Maori Party MP Hone Harawira.

"This page will centre on family violence, social issues, child safety, alcohol and drugs and developing support networks in our communities to STOP the Deaths by Abuse of "OUR" Children," Ms Sweeney wrote on the page in a May 13 post.

She was humbled by the amount of support she has had.

The trust which is starting with a $345 in the coffers from public donations will advocate for the nation's children.

Ms Sweeney is establishing a Rest In Peace tab on the site, which will feature pictures of victims alongside inquest reports. 

 
"I tried to get coroners' reports, but they told me it would be $50 per application. With 150 names that's $7500 I don't have."
 
While it's early days  the trust will hold a meeting in Ngaruawahia later this month to draw up its mandate  supporters on Facebook are brimming with ideas, including a national march to raise awareness.
 
"People have designed logos, a few of the MPs have decided to get in on it." Ms Sweeney said.
 
"I can get people together (through Facebook) who are having issues.
 
"There's been heaps and heaps of messages on the page. It's a very big eye-opener for me.
 
"A lot of it is just being able to speak up. We are setting up this Nark Trust here, in Ngaruawahia, and we have to set up a bank account."
 
The Nark Trust will meet at the Ngaruawahia Community House on June 27.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was NO accountability for monies accumulated and the Nark Trust was never set up legally as a Trust, Charity, Org or other...... 
 
So this leaves the question, how much money did Cherie solicit?  Where did that money go?
 
She never got the inquest reports, as she had said in the article.
 
"I tried to get coroners' reports, but they told me it would be $50 per application. With 150 names that's $7500 I don't have."
 

She certainly solicited for monies from the very beginnings.

 
 
If we had not sent a complaint of removal request, to the Give a little site, she would certainly have continued to use the Nark "give a little pages", until this day. She gave no notice to the Give a little site team as to informing them its a non entity and non Transparency of her fake Org. 
 
Ms Cherie Sweeney's lack of integrity is extremely disappointing, and her continuation of using "heartfelt issues" throughout the years as her money incentive, is quite questionable to say the least.
 
 

Wednesday 15 January 2014

More online information about indentifying and avioding Charity Scams

Articles from America on Charity Scams:
A more in-depth look at the different kinds of Charity Scams.

Please note: the IRS or CRA (America) is equivalent to IRD in NZ.

How to Spot a Charity Scam Artist- link for article:   USA

By
 
Many kind-hearted individuals and businesses make financial donations towards the end of the year. Unfortunately, online scam artists count on this and step up their efforts to steal valuable identifying information, load your computer with viruses, and swindle donors through Email solicitation campaigns. 

 How Email Charity Scam Artists Con Donors

Scam artists send out their mass email campaigns asking for charitable donations for a variety of causes. Online scam artists have gotten more sophisticated and are no longer simply asking you to mail them information or offering a hyperlink (usually to a virus or form to input identifying information.) Many scam artists are now taking the time to develop actual "charity" websites in an attempt to convince you that they are real.
 
Before you make an online donation to any charity you are unfamiliar with check them out.

Unfortunately, not all charities are listed in the online IRS database (which is about two years behind in listing charities it has approved for tax exemption status.) If you cannot find the charity online, call the IRS or your state's tax board.
 
Typically, only multi-million dollar charities are listing in registries like GuideStar. Even the Better Business Bureau (BBB), which is now starting to list charities, is misleading, because to get your charity listed with the BBB, you only have to pay a (steep) registration fee.

But you can still spot a scam artist by being alert to the following dead giveaways that a charity is a scam.

Charities That Ask for Too Much Information Are Scams
 
Any charity that asks for too much information, including your date of birth, social security number or driver's license information is a scam.

Charities are not required by the IRS or state charity laws to collect this information and they do not need this information to process a donation or issue a tax receipt.

Unsolicited Mass Email Campaigns Are Dead Give Aways!
 
Charities are bound by CAN SPAM Laws - they are not allowed to contact you through purchased mass email lists, and they cannot use web robots to collect Email addresses from public Internet sources.
 
In fact, unless you have previously donated to a particular charity, I would be highly suspicious of any charity that contacted you via Email out of the blue.
 
Discard any Email that is sent to "Undisclosed Recipients." It is almost certainly a scam.

Charities Do Not Send Attachments in Solicitations Legitimate

Legitimate charities are smart about their solicitations. They know people are unlikely to open emails with attachments and they do not send them.

Do not open any charity Email with an attachment. And, before you click on any hyperlink in a solicitation Email be sure you are not clicking on a virus link.
 
If you are not sure how to do this, read How to Spot Fake Hyperlinks in Emails.
 
Fake Charity Website Dead Giveaways
 
Check out the charity's website before you visit it or click on Email hyperlinks. The fastest and easiest way is to check out the website's domain registration information.
 
To see when a website went live, visit www.Whois.sc and enter in the domain name. Whois.sc will tell you when the website went live, where its servers are located, etc. You do not have to create an account, and basic information about websites is free.
 
Scammers almost always purchase domain names for one year. They expect to get caught and shut down and discard the domain. Whois.sc allows you to look at when the domain registration expires.
  
If it will expire in less than one year, they might be a scam artist.

 How To Determine If your Charity is Legitimate

By
 
It is nice to give to others, and to help out those in need. When you choose a charity or cause to donate your money to, you need to make sure that you are giving a legitimate organization that will use your money for the purpose that you intended. It is your money that you are giving, so you should be sure that the charity or cause support your beliefs and your purposes when you give.
 
Here's How:
  1. First, you need to determine which charity or cause that you want to give to. For example if you want to donate a gift or money for children over the holidays you should have several different options available in your area to choose from. If you are choosing to help fight cancer or another cause you may different organizations to choose from as well.
  2. Second, you need to make sure that the organization you are giving to is legitimate. An easy way to do this is make sure it is a national organization with a large track record. You can check with your state to see if they are registered as a nonprofit. Many nonprofits also post where the contributions go on their websites. If you donate to a large organization such as the Red Cross you may be able to choose to support a specific need or cause.
  3. Third, you need to make sure that you are donating through a legitimate channel. For example, people have gone door to door collecting donations, and claiming that they belong to an organization when they do not. Usually you are best to contact your local chapter of the organization or the national organization and donate directly to them.
  4. Fourth, if you donate on the Internet be sure that you use a secure connection. You also need to make sure that the site is legitimate and not a site that was put up by someone other than the organization that you are trying to donate to. Be especially careful if you are linking to the site through an email that you received.
Tips:
  1. Giving money is a great way to help others. It can help you to feel empowered and to take control of your finances as you take time to donate on a regular basis. Many financial advisors recommend giving money on a regular basis.
  2. You should determine how much you can give and stick to your budget. You may choose to divide it between several different organizations or causes or you may choose to give to just one. The help that you give will be appreciated. You can also claim the donation as a tax deduction.
  3. Take advantage of the opportunities to donate through your work. Many companies will offer an incentive if you will contribute to United Way or another organization through your work. If you are comfortable giving to United Way it is easy to have the money automatically deducted from your paycheck each month.
  4. If you do not have the money to give, consider donating your time to a cause that you feel is important. Many people in their twenties spend time mentoring children and teenagers through Big Brothers and Big Sisters or other similar organizations. You can also give smaller donations of goods to your local food pantry to help when you have a little extra money. 
 
What You Need 
  • Money  
  • Time 

Avoid Donating to Irresponsible or Bogus Charities

 
There are many times in our lives when we decide to donate to charities that need our money to do their good work. We may feel moved to donate to a charity that does research in a certain health area we are interested in. When someone we loved or respected dies, their family may ask for donations in lieu of flowers. Tragedies often trigger creation of new charities, as when a young person dies a tragic death.
 
Sometimes we want to donate simply because we are asked to. And, of course, the end of the year, during the holiday season, we consider our gifting at the same time we plan for completing the tax year.
 
There are three important planning steps to determining the right charities to donate to:
  1. Develop your giving goals.
     
  2. Make sure a charity is bona fide; that is, that it exists to truly help the organization or individual it is meant to help.
     
  3. Research the strength of a charity's fiscal responsibility and its track record for using donated money to address the goals that are of interest to you.
Here is information to help you with these steps:
 
1. How can you choose which charities to donate to?
The best way is to set some giving goals - from the type of charity to the scope of its reach. For example, do you want to donate to help research treatment options for a certain disease? or perhaps you want to help pay for medical care for a child who has a rare disease? Here is how to determine what kinds of charities you want to support.
 
2. Confirm the authenticity of the charity.
There are tens of thousands of charities that ask you for money, but not all of them are real charities, meaning, some are only set up to take your money, and not to truly help your cause. This is particularly true when a tragedy has taken place, such as those scammers who claimed they represented families who lost a child at Sandy Hook, or which claimed they were assisting people who lost their homes after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.
 
If a charity is new to you, or if you have received some sort of solicitation by phone or email, do not simply assume that it is safe to donate - or even to link to the charity from an email link or a FaceBook page or other social media. You might be giving money to someone who doesn't deserve it, and even worse, if it's online, you may pick up a computer virus, too.
 
Therefore, it's important to confirm that you are donating to a bona fide charity, one that is authentic and will use your money well.
 
In some cases you can know whether a charity is "real" by confirming its IRS or CRA status. But don't ask the charity, and don't simply accept a statement on its website since we know that not all websites have credible information.
 
Instead check with either of these resources to confirm a charity's authenticity:
  • The Better Business Bureau will help you search for a rating on a specific charity. You won't be able to search for a group of charities with one focus, but you can find out how individual, even local, charities are rated or whether the BBB accredits them.
3. How well does the charity address your goals?
 
There are two important aspects of how well a charity is run that will be of interest to us as donors.
First, take a look at its fiscal responsibility. You want to know how well run a charity is; whether they waste their money, or have fulfilled their promises.
 
The second is to be sure they focus on the aspects you think are important. We all have different reasons for donating, whether we're donating to health-related charities or the local high school band. When it comes to health-related charities, it's important to learn enough about them to be sure they work toward the same goals as you have.
 
For example, both my grandmother and my mother died of Alzheimer's disease, so I know I probably have some genetic tendency toward developing Alzheimer's myself. My goal, then, is for my donations to go toward research to find a cure, or at least a highly effective treatment.
 
But in doing my research for the best Alzheimer's focused charitable organization to donate to, I learned that they don't all do what they say they plan to do. In one case, I realized how much money and effort was going toward paying other organizations to fund raise for them. Others say they are focused on research, but in some cases I learned that less than 20% of their donations actually go toward research! Would you think twice about donating to a charity that said one thing but showed a track record of something else? I certainly did.

Here are two websites that can help you check both fiscal responsibility and a charity's real spending vs the focus it claims:
  • Charity Navigator allows you to search by the name of an organization or by the disease or condition you hope to support. It allows for some very deep research into the financials, efficiency, cost of administration and more. It also provides a list of all 4-star rated health-related charities (4-stars are its highest ranking.)
     
  • GuideStar collects information about non-profit organizations and makes it available to the public through its website.  Included is a charity evaluator, among many other offerings.
Bottom line:

You have worked hard to earn the money you are ready to donate. Be sure that when you give your money away, you do so in a considered fashion, to groups or individuals that will be good shepherds of your donation.

Educating yourself is the best defence! Info from the IRD NZ

The following information is from IRD NZ the Link here: www.ird.govt.nz/.../our-compliance-focus-2010-11.pdf 
 
Non-profit groups
Non-profit groups, eg, society clubs, amateur sports clubs, charities and district societies, are exempt from income tax. There are 26,000 registered charities in New Zealand. Non-profit groups employ over 200,000 staff and volunteers—just over 9% of the working population.
Updated webpages for non-profit groups
In 2009–10 we developed a better understanding of the non-profit sector and how best to interact with them. Research showed us that the key to improving compliance for non-profit groups is in understanding their communication needs.
In March 2010 we launched an updated non-profit section on our website. We’ve tailored the refreshed site to meet non-profit groups’ needs.
 
The new non-profit section at www.ird.govt.nz/non-profit includes information about employing staff and volunteers, paying and claiming GST, recovering donations and grants, and keeping records and filing returns.
The feedback, so far, has been positive with non-profit groups telling us it gives them a better understanding of what they need to do to comply.
We based our refresh on changes non-profit groups asked for through research we did in August 2009. Overall, we found they prefer targeted information.
 
Misusing charities tax-exempt status
The non-profit sector provides important community services and products that make a difference for thousands of New Zealanders. To recognise this, registered charities don’t have to pay tax.
The majority of charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by a small group of individuals who try to exploit their tax-exempt status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.
We will address misuse of charities tax-exempt status by:
·         working with the Charities Commission to reduce opportunities for misusing tax-exempt status
·         identifying charities that create false receipts and invoices, organisations that claim to be charities but aren’t, and claims from claimants who are trustees, officers or who derive a monetary benefit from the charity
(in this case NARK.Org.NZ founder)
·         investigating and applying sanctions and penalties to anyone who chooses not to comply with their obligations and prosecuting them, where necessary.

Non-profit groups’ awareness of their obligations

Non-profit groups play an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the giving schemes. They need to provide authentic receipts for donations and ensure arrangements they put in place to encourage these donations don’t compromise customer privacy and Inland Revenue systems.
We work with non-profit groups that aren’t registered with the Charities Commission. We give advice about the registration process and make sure they understand their tax obligations and the potential consequences of not registering. The non-profit groups we’ve contacted have responded positively to our information about their obligations.
We will work with non-profit groups to ensure they:
·         understand charitable giving, eg, the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes
·         comply with the rules.

Tax incentives for charitable giving

New Zealand offers tax incentives to people who give money to registered charities. They can claim part of it back as a tax credit, either as a donation tax credit or through the payroll giving scheme.
But, in the past year, we’ve identified a number of issues that could affect the integrity of the tax system. They include:
·         ineligible or fraudulent donation tax credit claims being filed
·         people claiming a donation tax credit without meeting the application requirements
·         uncertainties about an organisation’s status, or interpretation of the donee organisation rules.
(No interpretation as to Nark.Org.NZ, being a Trust, Charity, Cause, Organization....)
We want individuals and businesses to understand the charitable giving process and follow the correct processes for making claims.

We will address tax issues around charitable giving by:

·         publicising the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes to donors and non-profit organisations, eg, contributing to an inter-agency education programme
·         educating tax agents and employers about the application requirements for charitable giving
·         educating individuals who file an Individual tax return (IR 3) income tax return about the steps we follow when processing their donation tax credit claims
·         raising awareness about how to access information on the donations tax credit requirements and the payroll giving scheme
·         improving our internal systems to quickly and accurately pick up incorrect and fraudulent claims, eg, income verification and tolerance checks to find input errors
·         continuing to investigate, apply sanctions and penalties, and prosecute, if necessary.
 
Misuse of charities
 
In recognition of the non-profit sector’s contribution to our communities, registered charities are allowed various exemptions and concessions. They also receive public and private donations, for which tax credits are claimed.
 
Most charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by people wanting to take advantage of their tax-exempt or concessionary status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.

In the past year, we have seen a growing range of abusive practices involving charities. These do not appear to involve generic schemes for tax avoidance. Instead, some taxpayers and their advisors are trying to use charities as a tax-saving device.

Increasingly, we are working in partnership with the Charities Commission (whose business functions have recently been moved to the Department of Internal Affairs) to identify charities and individuals whose activities warrant investigation. We are also developing appropriate compliance strategies.
 
A key resource for this work is the “open government data” that the Charities Commission now publishes on its website. Our information exchange with the Commission also helps us to identify existing and emerging trends in the misuse of charities.
 
We also liaise regularly with the ATO.

We are refining the legal and technical issues for cases involving charities, and have resourced specialist investigators to identify abusive practices and progress  cases swiftly.

We will investigate people who enter into tax avoidance schemes involving charities or who create false receipts and invoices. We will also focus on organisations that claim to be charities but are not, and on claims from trustees, officers or other people who receive payment from the charity.
 
Where appropriate, we will prosecute those who choose not to comply with their obligations.
 
 What you can do
 
• Make sure you understand your obligations. Avoid entering into any scheme that uses charities inappropriately. If you are unsure about your obligations, contact us for confirmation.
 
• If you or your client have misused a charity’s status,  you can contact us and make a voluntary disclosure, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: voluntary disclosure).
 
 • If you have information about the misuse of a charity, you can report it to us anonymously through our website, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: anonymous).  
 

Charitable organisations
Nga whakahaere aroha

 
Charitable organisations are organisations (whether incorporated or not) that carry out charitable activities or exist exclusively for charitable purposes. Since 1 July 2008 a charitable organisation needs to be registered by the Charities Commission to receive tax exemptions.

Income tax and charitable organisations

Charitable organisations are liable for income tax if they operate with no written rules, constitution or trust deed or they operate under a set of rules, a constitution or a trust deed that does not meet the requirements for income tax exemption or they use business income for charitable purposes outside New Zealand. Learn about rates of income tax, when to file returns and possible exemptions.

Registration of charities

The Charities Commission maintains a register of charitable entities that opened on 1 February 2007. Registration is voluntary, but if a charity wishes to be exempt from income tax and donors of gifts exempt from gift duty it will need to register.

Transitional guidelines for charities

These administrative guidelines are intended to provide clarity about the tax position for entities that have not completed the process of registering with the Charities Commission by 1 July 2008.
 
$1,000 income deduction
Some non-profit organisations may qualify for a $1,000 income deduction. This deduction makes the first $1,000 of income that organisation earns free from income tax.

If your organisation earns under $1,000

If your organisation's net income is below $1,000 per year, then the deduction effectively means you are exempt from income tax.
   
Therefore you won't be taxed on any income you earn, and don't need to file any income tax returns.
However, we recommend your organisation keeps records of any financial transactions, in case they are required for future reference. 

Note

An exemption or deduction of income tax doesn't automatically qualify your organisation for an exemption to all taxes. You may still be liable to pay other taxes, such as GST.

If your organisation earns over $1,000

If your organisation's net income is above $1,000 per year, you may be eligible for a deduction of up to $1,000. If you subtract this amount from your organisation's income, you reduce the amount of tax to pay.
   
To qualify for this deduction, your organisation will need to have written rules. An organisation without rules or a constitution won't qualify for the $1,000 income deduction.

Applying for the $1,000 income deduction

If your organisation doesn't qualify for an income tax exemption, you can apply for a deduction against your net income.
   
A non-profit organisation is allowed a deduction for the amount equal to the lesser of:
  • $1,000, or
  • the amount that would be the net income of the organisation.
To apply for a deduction, your organisation will need to follow the same processes as applying for the income exemption.

Applying for an income tax exemption

If you're a charitable organisation, go to the Charities Commission website to register as a charity.
   
If you're a non-profit body of any other kind, you may qualify for an income tax exemption.
Income tax exemptions aren't automatic. You'll need to apply to us in writing - go to "Contact us" for our address details.
   
Your organisation can send us a draft document of your exemption application for us to review. We can then suggest any changes before your organisation goes through the process and cost of having it submitted.
   
When you apply for the exemption, please include the following information about your organisation:
  • IRD number - if you don't have one, you'll need to apply. Please complete an IRD number application - non-individual (IR596)
  • a copy of its rules, constitution, trust deed or other founding documents - preferably in draft (before being finalised) form
  • a copy of its certificate of incorporation (if applicable)
  • a letter stating the type(s) of exemption being requested, eg sports club
  • details of how it has been or will be operating.
We'll then give you written confirmation of your organisation's tax exempt status for income tax.

Charitable purpose

Charitable purposes include:
  • the relief of poverty
  • the advancement of education
  • the advancement of religion
  • activities for the benefit of the community.
An organisation's purposes must fall within one of these categories to be charitable. Its activities or aims must be for public purposes and the benefit must be available to a large section of the community. In addition, it must not be carried on for the benefit or profit of any individual. If the beneficiaries are limited by blood ties the charitable purpose can still be met in some circumstances.

Many organisations consider themselves charitable because of the work they do or because they are registered under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. As a result, they may also think they are exempt from income tax. However, from 1 July 2008, an organisation will only be tax-exempt if it is a registered charity. Such an exemption does not apply to goods and services tax (GST) or PAYE. The organisation must still account for these.

Your organisation's income tax return

If your organisation has an annual turnover of less than $1,000, you don't need to file an income tax return. You'll simply need to keep sufficient records for your organisation.

If your income is above this threshold, or is expected to be, then you'll need to file an income tax return. The table below outlines what income return you'll need to file, depending on the type of your organisation.

If your organisation is a...then you'll need to file an...
registered and incorporated companyIR4 company income tax return
trust or estateIR6 income tax return for estates or trusts
club, society or associationIR9 income tax return for clubs or societies
 Go to Filing your income tax return at the end of the tax year


N.A.R.K Org.NZ threshold was well over $1,000