Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Business. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

Moments in Time: The tactics of Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney Expliots

2009 Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) and Exploitation

From the achieves:

 
In 2009 a documentary was created by TV3 60 minutes regarding girl gangs in Hastings. A huge issue was centred around the filming of the Documentary and also of "alleged" alcohol involvement.
 
No substantial evidence was forthcoming.
 
It was found that the TV3 60 minute documentary did breach privacy laws and not protecting the identities of the girls who's ages were aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16yrs of age. 
 
The full BSA Complaint and final decision can be accessed on the Hastings District Council and TV Works LTD 2009-088 link above.
 
Here is an article also about this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BSA finds girls treated unfairly in gangs item

 
 
A TV3 60 Minutes item on girl gangs in Hawke's Bay did not sufficiently protect the identities of four girls, exploited them and treated them unfairly, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found.
The broadcaster has been ordered to make an on-air apology and pay $6000 costs.
 
Hastings District Council complained about the item, which contained interviews with current and former gang members and was broadcast on April 27 last year.
 
Included in the item were four girls - one aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16 - who were shown wearing gang-style clothing. Two of the girls were shown spray painting graffiti on a basketball court and two were shown re-enacting breaking into a house.
 
The girls were not interviewed but the reporter said they had told her they were drinking and getting into fights.
 
Two of the council's six complaints were upheld, with the authority finding breaches of the privacy and fairness standards.
 
The four girls were shown with their faces covered by bandanas but during the item three of the bandanas slipped, exposing the girls' faces.
The authority said that even if the bandanas had not slipped, it did not agree with the broadcaster that they provided sufficient protection of their identity.
 
"Viewers could see the top half of the girls' faces including their eyes, nose and hair colour. In addition, several full length shots of the girls showed their body shapes and distinctive clothing," the decision said.
 
The three girls under 16 were not old enough to consent to a broadcast that would breach their privacy the decision said and, "there is no evidence to suggest that a parent or guardian consented on their behalf..."
 
In the case of the 16-year-old, there was an understanding with the reporter that her identity would not be revealed and the authority did not find the bandana to be a sufficient disguise.
 
"The authority considers that the broadcaster reneged on an understanding not to reveal the girls' identities, and thereby disclosed private facts in a highly offensive manner about four young girls, three of whom were children," the decision said.
 
On the issue of unfairness, the decision said that the young girls were exposed as participating in criminal and anti-social behaviour when the broadcaster had agreed not to identify them.
The authority found the broadcaster failed to appreciate the harm the item could cause to the reputations and futures of the young girls.
 
"In this respect, the authority is of the view that the broadcast exploited the girls, due to their young age and lack of appreciation for the consequences of their actions, and unnecessarily identified them. It considers that all four girls were treated unfairly."
 
The authority ordered TVWorks Ltd to broadcast a summary of the decision within a month and to pay complainant costs of $3560.12 and Crown costs of $2500.
- NZPA
 
Another article in the 3 News NZ website. Please click in the link.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Mrs Roberta Karangaroa's input on this issue and also that she had "heard"  alcohol was being provided to the girls by the 60 minutes crew during filming.
 
TV team in booze row
   

Television news show 60 Minutes denies allegations it bought alcohol for a group of young Hawke's Bay women interviewed for its story Girls in the Hood which screened on TV3 on Sunday.
 
Instead, the producer of the show said the 60 Minutes team was invited to attend a party and took along a small quantity of alcohol "in the customary way".

Executive producer Terrence Taylor said the party was held by an adult and took place after all the interviews had been completed.

"No other alcohol was given to anyone," he said in written replies to Hawke's Bay Today.

Hastings Mayor Lawrence Yule said he was disappointed with the way the story on girl gangs portrayed Hastings, Napier and in particular Flaxmere.

"I'm just trying to stand up for a part of my community that has been shafted by a journalist from outside the area," he said.

Mr Yule said it had appeared to him the young girls interviewed had been supplied alcohol as a prop for the story. They were filmed drinking a bottle of Johnny Walker whisky.

Today he was meeting Riverslea Community Trust spokeswoman Roberta Karangaroa to talk about their options, which may include a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council.

Ms Karangaroa, who works with youth, said she also had heard a bottle of alcohol had been bought by 60 Minutes and given to the girls to drink while they were filmed for the story.

Mr Yule and Ms Karangaroa were upset the girls had been asked to re-enact a burglary on the show.

Mr Taylor said the girls 60 Minutes interviewed did act out a burglary scene but re-enactments were often used in current affairs shows.

" ... and we are sure that viewers would see from the way it was filmed that this was clearly re-enacted," he said.

Mr Taylor said 60 Minutes did not say there were limited services available to help girls in gangs back on to the straight and narrow.

"A participant in the story, a knowledgeable expert on girl 'crews', suggested that young women are attracted to these groups because they don't receive enough support elsewhere.
This was her honest opinion," he said.

Mr Taylor said the 60 Minutes team did seek comment from the Maori community in the course of researching the story.

"We spoke to a community group, who agreed that girl crews are a problem in the area," he said.

"We stand by the story, which we believe highlighted a serious issue. In the light of the interest that it seems to have created, we are considering returning to do a follow-up," he said.

Obscene language had been displayed on the 60 Minutes website from bloggers leaving comments about the Girls in the Hood story.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here are the paragraphs related to Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) from the BSA  site.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney was known as a fixer (paid as an assistant).  As pointed out, she received $1,000 dollars for this job.  This is something  she had stated last year that, she had done this on a voluntary basis.  Here is her admittance of being involved:



From her post she had said:

"I helped girlgangs that were causing havoc in our communities as I felt that these girls could be helped if pointed in the right direction.   "This was ALL voluntary."

More from our previous post of this is issue here

From the BSA website:

Complainant

[24]   The HDC argued that the programme’s makers had relied on one of the women interviewed to conduct research for the item, including interviewing the mayor and local MPs, but it noted that none of this “research” occurred. It said that the broadcaster had told the HDC that the woman was an assistant producer who owned her own media company, and alleged that she was paid $1,000 for organising the story. The complainant considered the woman to be unreliable and stated that the broadcaster had taken no steps to check what research she had done.

The Broadcasters Response

[43]   Turning to the $1000 payment made to one of the women for organising the story, the broadcaster stated that the woman ran her own company and had worked for the media in the past. It said she was paid as an assistant or “fixer” to introduce the reporter to people in the area. TVWorks considered that the payment was “entirely legitimate” and reasonable considering her knowledge of girl gangs. It stated that another of the women interviewed had been paid $200 plus a small sum of lunch money for her and the other girls being filmed. It said that the woman’s car had been used in several scenes and that the reporter had “filled the tank”.

Authority's Determination

Contracting the “fixer” and the nature of the item overall
[101]   With respect to 60 Minutes’ use of a “fixer”, the Authority is satisfied with TVWorks’ explanation of why it employed a person to make contacts for the reporter so that she could conduct interviews and obtain other material for the story.
 
Why would she again lie about this being voluntary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Former gang girl hits back

 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 She had also stated in this Media article that....

"Cheriek Kara, a mother of two who is working towards her master's degree in Maori and management, featured as a reformed teen gang member on the current affairs show alongside present gang members trying to change their lifestyles."

When asked if she had completed her studies and gained her Masters Degree, nothing was produced.  

This picture was given by a close family member who posted this one of the many pages that Ms Cherie had removed. 

When it comes to exploitation of monies for her "causes" she certainly makes sure to get paid.


Cherie and Michael
  There is more to this story which will be posted in due time.



 

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Educating yourself is the best defence! Info from the IRD NZ

The following information is from IRD NZ the Link here: www.ird.govt.nz/.../our-compliance-focus-2010-11.pdf 
 
Non-profit groups
Non-profit groups, eg, society clubs, amateur sports clubs, charities and district societies, are exempt from income tax. There are 26,000 registered charities in New Zealand. Non-profit groups employ over 200,000 staff and volunteers—just over 9% of the working population.
Updated webpages for non-profit groups
In 2009–10 we developed a better understanding of the non-profit sector and how best to interact with them. Research showed us that the key to improving compliance for non-profit groups is in understanding their communication needs.
In March 2010 we launched an updated non-profit section on our website. We’ve tailored the refreshed site to meet non-profit groups’ needs.
 
The new non-profit section at www.ird.govt.nz/non-profit includes information about employing staff and volunteers, paying and claiming GST, recovering donations and grants, and keeping records and filing returns.
The feedback, so far, has been positive with non-profit groups telling us it gives them a better understanding of what they need to do to comply.
We based our refresh on changes non-profit groups asked for through research we did in August 2009. Overall, we found they prefer targeted information.
 
Misusing charities tax-exempt status
The non-profit sector provides important community services and products that make a difference for thousands of New Zealanders. To recognise this, registered charities don’t have to pay tax.
The majority of charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by a small group of individuals who try to exploit their tax-exempt status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.
We will address misuse of charities tax-exempt status by:
·         working with the Charities Commission to reduce opportunities for misusing tax-exempt status
·         identifying charities that create false receipts and invoices, organisations that claim to be charities but aren’t, and claims from claimants who are trustees, officers or who derive a monetary benefit from the charity
(in this case NARK.Org.NZ founder)
·         investigating and applying sanctions and penalties to anyone who chooses not to comply with their obligations and prosecuting them, where necessary.

Non-profit groups’ awareness of their obligations

Non-profit groups play an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the giving schemes. They need to provide authentic receipts for donations and ensure arrangements they put in place to encourage these donations don’t compromise customer privacy and Inland Revenue systems.
We work with non-profit groups that aren’t registered with the Charities Commission. We give advice about the registration process and make sure they understand their tax obligations and the potential consequences of not registering. The non-profit groups we’ve contacted have responded positively to our information about their obligations.
We will work with non-profit groups to ensure they:
·         understand charitable giving, eg, the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes
·         comply with the rules.

Tax incentives for charitable giving

New Zealand offers tax incentives to people who give money to registered charities. They can claim part of it back as a tax credit, either as a donation tax credit or through the payroll giving scheme.
But, in the past year, we’ve identified a number of issues that could affect the integrity of the tax system. They include:
·         ineligible or fraudulent donation tax credit claims being filed
·         people claiming a donation tax credit without meeting the application requirements
·         uncertainties about an organisation’s status, or interpretation of the donee organisation rules.
(No interpretation as to Nark.Org.NZ, being a Trust, Charity, Cause, Organization....)
We want individuals and businesses to understand the charitable giving process and follow the correct processes for making claims.

We will address tax issues around charitable giving by:

·         publicising the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes to donors and non-profit organisations, eg, contributing to an inter-agency education programme
·         educating tax agents and employers about the application requirements for charitable giving
·         educating individuals who file an Individual tax return (IR 3) income tax return about the steps we follow when processing their donation tax credit claims
·         raising awareness about how to access information on the donations tax credit requirements and the payroll giving scheme
·         improving our internal systems to quickly and accurately pick up incorrect and fraudulent claims, eg, income verification and tolerance checks to find input errors
·         continuing to investigate, apply sanctions and penalties, and prosecute, if necessary.
 
Misuse of charities
 
In recognition of the non-profit sector’s contribution to our communities, registered charities are allowed various exemptions and concessions. They also receive public and private donations, for which tax credits are claimed.
 
Most charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by people wanting to take advantage of their tax-exempt or concessionary status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.

In the past year, we have seen a growing range of abusive practices involving charities. These do not appear to involve generic schemes for tax avoidance. Instead, some taxpayers and their advisors are trying to use charities as a tax-saving device.

Increasingly, we are working in partnership with the Charities Commission (whose business functions have recently been moved to the Department of Internal Affairs) to identify charities and individuals whose activities warrant investigation. We are also developing appropriate compliance strategies.
 
A key resource for this work is the “open government data” that the Charities Commission now publishes on its website. Our information exchange with the Commission also helps us to identify existing and emerging trends in the misuse of charities.
 
We also liaise regularly with the ATO.

We are refining the legal and technical issues for cases involving charities, and have resourced specialist investigators to identify abusive practices and progress  cases swiftly.

We will investigate people who enter into tax avoidance schemes involving charities or who create false receipts and invoices. We will also focus on organisations that claim to be charities but are not, and on claims from trustees, officers or other people who receive payment from the charity.
 
Where appropriate, we will prosecute those who choose not to comply with their obligations.
 
 What you can do
 
• Make sure you understand your obligations. Avoid entering into any scheme that uses charities inappropriately. If you are unsure about your obligations, contact us for confirmation.
 
• If you or your client have misused a charity’s status,  you can contact us and make a voluntary disclosure, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: voluntary disclosure).
 
 • If you have information about the misuse of a charity, you can report it to us anonymously through our website, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: anonymous).  
 

Charitable organisations
Nga whakahaere aroha

 
Charitable organisations are organisations (whether incorporated or not) that carry out charitable activities or exist exclusively for charitable purposes. Since 1 July 2008 a charitable organisation needs to be registered by the Charities Commission to receive tax exemptions.

Income tax and charitable organisations

Charitable organisations are liable for income tax if they operate with no written rules, constitution or trust deed or they operate under a set of rules, a constitution or a trust deed that does not meet the requirements for income tax exemption or they use business income for charitable purposes outside New Zealand. Learn about rates of income tax, when to file returns and possible exemptions.

Registration of charities

The Charities Commission maintains a register of charitable entities that opened on 1 February 2007. Registration is voluntary, but if a charity wishes to be exempt from income tax and donors of gifts exempt from gift duty it will need to register.

Transitional guidelines for charities

These administrative guidelines are intended to provide clarity about the tax position for entities that have not completed the process of registering with the Charities Commission by 1 July 2008.
 
$1,000 income deduction
Some non-profit organisations may qualify for a $1,000 income deduction. This deduction makes the first $1,000 of income that organisation earns free from income tax.

If your organisation earns under $1,000

If your organisation's net income is below $1,000 per year, then the deduction effectively means you are exempt from income tax.
   
Therefore you won't be taxed on any income you earn, and don't need to file any income tax returns.
However, we recommend your organisation keeps records of any financial transactions, in case they are required for future reference. 

Note

An exemption or deduction of income tax doesn't automatically qualify your organisation for an exemption to all taxes. You may still be liable to pay other taxes, such as GST.

If your organisation earns over $1,000

If your organisation's net income is above $1,000 per year, you may be eligible for a deduction of up to $1,000. If you subtract this amount from your organisation's income, you reduce the amount of tax to pay.
   
To qualify for this deduction, your organisation will need to have written rules. An organisation without rules or a constitution won't qualify for the $1,000 income deduction.

Applying for the $1,000 income deduction

If your organisation doesn't qualify for an income tax exemption, you can apply for a deduction against your net income.
   
A non-profit organisation is allowed a deduction for the amount equal to the lesser of:
  • $1,000, or
  • the amount that would be the net income of the organisation.
To apply for a deduction, your organisation will need to follow the same processes as applying for the income exemption.

Applying for an income tax exemption

If you're a charitable organisation, go to the Charities Commission website to register as a charity.
   
If you're a non-profit body of any other kind, you may qualify for an income tax exemption.
Income tax exemptions aren't automatic. You'll need to apply to us in writing - go to "Contact us" for our address details.
   
Your organisation can send us a draft document of your exemption application for us to review. We can then suggest any changes before your organisation goes through the process and cost of having it submitted.
   
When you apply for the exemption, please include the following information about your organisation:
  • IRD number - if you don't have one, you'll need to apply. Please complete an IRD number application - non-individual (IR596)
  • a copy of its rules, constitution, trust deed or other founding documents - preferably in draft (before being finalised) form
  • a copy of its certificate of incorporation (if applicable)
  • a letter stating the type(s) of exemption being requested, eg sports club
  • details of how it has been or will be operating.
We'll then give you written confirmation of your organisation's tax exempt status for income tax.

Charitable purpose

Charitable purposes include:
  • the relief of poverty
  • the advancement of education
  • the advancement of religion
  • activities for the benefit of the community.
An organisation's purposes must fall within one of these categories to be charitable. Its activities or aims must be for public purposes and the benefit must be available to a large section of the community. In addition, it must not be carried on for the benefit or profit of any individual. If the beneficiaries are limited by blood ties the charitable purpose can still be met in some circumstances.

Many organisations consider themselves charitable because of the work they do or because they are registered under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. As a result, they may also think they are exempt from income tax. However, from 1 July 2008, an organisation will only be tax-exempt if it is a registered charity. Such an exemption does not apply to goods and services tax (GST) or PAYE. The organisation must still account for these.

Your organisation's income tax return

If your organisation has an annual turnover of less than $1,000, you don't need to file an income tax return. You'll simply need to keep sufficient records for your organisation.

If your income is above this threshold, or is expected to be, then you'll need to file an income tax return. The table below outlines what income return you'll need to file, depending on the type of your organisation.

If your organisation is a...then you'll need to file an...
registered and incorporated companyIR4 company income tax return
trust or estateIR6 income tax return for estates or trusts
club, society or associationIR9 income tax return for clubs or societies
 Go to Filing your income tax return at the end of the tax year


N.A.R.K Org.NZ threshold was well over $1,000
 

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Cherie Kurarangi and Micheal Sweeney's Business Ventures and Info

Cones Article 30/11/2011


Hot Shot Productions Limited 
Registered on the 13th January 2012
 

This is not an actual Address.......
 
 



Strangely this was a couple of days after, Nark was found to have missing money, also NARK donations going to the Sweeney Joint account on 13th of January 2012.


13/01/2012
An account was closed with Nark funds and the monies were put into Cherie and Michael Sweeney's Joint Acct.

 
The Bank Chq too the Nark Account, its actually the Sweeney Joint acct above this picture.

Transaction statement of Sweeney Joint Account
 
 
 13th November 2010 Patent NZ


 
 


 






Address for the Registered Company Office: 28 Owen Rd......

 
28 Owen Rd, where the letter A is situated.... (a group of tree's on a paddock site), very unusual?
 




Our letter to Mr Hosking about the Address, and his response below........ (for our protection we used a random name, for security purposes).

 






















Note: We didn't mention any monies of funds from Nark in our messages.....
 

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Notes Section: Ex Board Member, Caro's posts


Resignation from Nark (Caro)

Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) on Monday, 19 March 2012 at 12:53 ·

Caro Cragg

Please see attached resignation presented to Nark on Sunday 8th Jan 2012

08.01.2012I Caro(full name and address was presented on original document )Do as of today’s date tender my resignation to the NARK Interim Board of Trustees and associated committees.I also tender my resignation as treasurer of NARK.1/ Treasurer resignation: Due to the issues surrounding the transfer of funds being timetabled on 09.01.2012 from Jim Boswell account to current NARK account and allowing for issues regarding payment for Cherie’s internet and T shirts, this resignation will take affect in 10 working day’s from 09.01.2012 so as to give time for a new Treasurer to be voted in and bank accounts and all financial issues to be finalised and new signatories to be appointed.

2/ as per law I have to give 30 day’s notice to vacate my position as Trustee today’s date being day one. This makes the final day as Trustee 07.02.2012.Also as required under the act my resignation will be taken to my lawyer or JP for witnessing on 09.01.2012A notice will also be placed on NARK Community page of my resignation and dates as advised.I will not be acting as administrator on any NARK pages after my resignation is officially posted, but will remain on those pages until the final date of the expiry of my duties as Trustee of NARK

Signed in full name As can be seen in this document, I never left Nark as accused by Cherie without notice.When this was presented I was in fact told as words got hot in the commitee room as other resignations were presented, that in fact I was not a legal trustee as I should have been aware as the organisation was not a legal entity and I was able to leave right now ----- so I did. Roberta discussed her disappointment of the situation, this was acceptedThis post is to show one point of the many untrue or misreported issues . I also have many emails, PM and screen shots to prove this resignation and what happened in the half an hour before being locked out of the community room. This post will end speculation and mis info from all.As I have had one hours sleep due to an emergency trip to Wellington and back overnite and work to go to, it may be later today before more info is posted


Mike Underwood Thanks Caro. Good to see Cheries untrue accusations in this regard being cleared up

4 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

T-Shirts (Caro)
Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) on Monday, 19 March 2012 at 13:16

Post 2 ---- T Shirts 

Cherie Nark NZ Emailed to Roberta, Friday, January 13, 2012 1:11 AM

Sorry I couldn't take anymore so signed out. Just so you are aware, and maybe this needs to be discussed with your police friends.

As far as I know the law, Katrina Crews and Caro Cragg and who ever else was involved, have created and thereafter, mis-used a document to commit fraud, namely the said T-shirt document, with prices and sizes etc which was created previous to the Nark Interim Board elections November 2011. It also appears previous to this date they have also sold said items without physically being in pocession of them between mid 2011 - 08 January 2012, the date of which their resignations were accepted. 

As you are aware, both the T-Shirt sales and all money matters I have never been involved with other than to decline Caro Craggs motion at the December meeting to have the sum of $770 paid to her for said T-Shirts with out proof of purchase or receipt or even a photo, to that effect, and of which this receipt and proof of purchase is still outstanding to this date of email. 

Further more, they have also used personal writtings owned by myself, namely the T-shirt release statement dated 4th December 2011 drafted for NARK, which was emailed to you today as way of some sort of proof of T-shirt existence on her behalf. I have not given my permission for this document to be used or distributed and until publically released by myself on behalf of NARK remains soley, my property. 

As you are aware due to lack of proof the T-shirts were in Caro Craggs possession and with lack of reciept as proof of purchase, this T-shirt release statement could not be released by the due given date of 9th December 2011 as Caro assured us, and as the Interim Board agreed. 

At 12.01.2012, this still can not be done due to lack of receipt or any proof of purchase of any T-shirts, as sold by Katrina Crews who was therefore accepting the Money for. We are aware the money is held by Jimmy Boswell which these are still held in the Westpac account and this has been verified today. I therefore suggest statement to the effect refunds are now available is the best way to move forward for the well being and future of NARK, in the name of due diligence an full disclosure and transparency, while the police investigate the other issues raised in this letter.

I look forward to resolving all issues as quickly as possible.

With Thanks,Miss D Standen

cc C.Sweeney, Nark interim board, K.Crews. C.Cragg, Nark Community Support Group Thread7 hours ago • Like.

URGENT FOR YOUR ATTENTIONAbove is a post made on the Nark community page containing many discrepancies and defamatory remarks

NO SUCH EMAIL AS ABOVE HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO ANY OF MY EMAIL ADDRESSES THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED LEGALLY 

1/ Misuse of document so as to procure funds for t shirts :As I was never involved in the issue of the long overdue , unordered shirts until November 2012, this is totally incorrect, please remove comment from post immediately. This was the province and responsibility of Jimmy Boswell as stated in his apology placed in HQ meeting, where it was stated he would post an apology on line as to his part in not following through with this matter.This was rejected by the committee so as to allow us to get the funds to new account and be able to order and deliver said shirts ( 16th November 2012 ) Full comments and meeting to prove this are on hard disk, flash drive and saved to my computer. The only thing that Katrina Crews had to do with this was to obtain orders, and the money went direct to account held by Jim Boswell.Invoices where posted at this time and this matter was for the attention of the person holding the funds and responsible for ordering the said shirts.DUE TO THE INCORRECT INFORMATION -IT IS REQUESTED THOSE INCORRECT STAMENTS BE REMOVED BY 5PM Saturday 14th January 2012

2/ At no time did I Carolyn .....request payment for shirts I had ordered. It was discussed and my need for urgency discussed as to the fact that I had privately and at my own cost , ordered the shirts so as to be able to get them delivered to the honest people who had paid for these items in August , September and October 2011.I was asked in committee to produce invoices and receipts to the committee who would pay on invoice.As this matter dragged out to Christmas Eve with no signs of money into new account, there were no funds to pay for said shirts. It was discussed that invoices including postage costs would be discussed when funds were available and when my accountant was back from holidayTake note ; these shirts have been paid for by me ,N.A.R.K has at this point no financial interest in the matter, please remove all statements in comments as above post on NARK pages by 5pm Saturday 14th January 2012All documentation pertaining to this matter, on disk, on flash drive and on my computer, including all PM’s meeting minutes and text messages, times of phone calls regarding this matter.

Conclusion;The matters above and a full retraction are to be posted on the NARK COMMUNITY pages by 5pm Saturday 14th 2012. By the spokesperson of N.A.R.K

I wish Nark to go forward to the future as you do, this can only happen if we move on in good spirit and faith

Carolyn ----------

EMAILED

To the Interim board N.A.R.K, 

It is with much sadness and anguish that I am to inform the interim board of N,A.R.K. that today Monday January 16th 2012 I have taken legal advice as to the email sent to the board on Friday 13th January 2012 requesting the removal of the post copied below and a retraction of all statements to be made on the N.A.R.K community page. This post was requested to be removed by 5pm Saturday 14th January 2012.

I have received no email contact from any member of the Interim Board in regards to that email, despite members being on line during the weekend and commenting on other matters.

All communications and posts have been directed to my solicitor who will be in touch in the next day or so after he has processed all information and statements supplied.

It is very disappointing that this matter has reached this level and I am distressed that a initiative evolved to stop abuse on our children could potentially be damaged by this action.

Communication could have seen this matter put to rest.

Carolyn 


Like · 2 people like this.





Caro Cragg These Items sent from my xtra account, the posts being supplied copy and pasted from that account

5 hours ago · Like



Mike Underwood Good luck with the legal action. I know you do this with a heavy heart. So unfortunate it has got to this, but now this is the only avenue available given the choices of Cherie and the remaining interim board. Our thoughts are with you

5 hours ago · Unlike ·  3



Jimmy Boswell and the finances


Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) on Monday, 19 March 2012 at 13:23 ·

Caro Cragg

Today there will be much posted as time allows, including emails concerning Wendy Belworthy, denied by Cherie, Financial details /TAKE ABSOLUTE NOTE OF THIS POSTThe only reason I am giving any info, as in fairness I have to say I have had very good manners and have tried very hard to protect and sure Nark and protecting the matter of a child abuse orgs do not get damaged, all this has done has made me just another bit of collateral damage on this page,Pete Georges page yesterday and goodness knows how many others --- misinformation,outright lies, enough is enough and I WILL clear my name.Yes I have started proceedings, do I want to NO, I wanted a simple apology and a post removed, will I present the shirts that I OWN AS I PAID FOR THEM -- yep in my time , everybody including Nark have muddied the waters of the discussions on this page and other - with something that was of no real concern to them , cos if I need to repeat this for more clarity I PAID FOR AND OWN THESE SHIRTS , FIND REAL ISSUES FOLKS, STOP MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF THIS MOLEHILL, THE ONLY PERSON TO HAVE LOST ANY FUNDS HERE WAS ME 
Unlike ·  · 5 hours ago ·  
  •  

  • You and 6 others like this.


    • Caro Cragg I took a post down to edit names and am now unable to post on page
      4 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Caro Cragg why is this coming to my email address, I have had enough of this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , this is both unprofessional on behalf of whoever cannot sort out a simple email address and also puts me in an incisdious position I do not wish to be in I want nothing to do with Nark or Nark buisness, enough!!!!! Get your buisness paractices in process NOW 

      ----- Original Message ----- From: JimSent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:55 PMSubject: bounce

      Jim
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg Names edited
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg Why are these coming to my email, I never had anything to do with the website, never had pass words and until now never had contact from this buisness org. Please sort all of this out as I am still getting emails from Give a little as well.Nark has had since the 8th January 2012 to sort all this out, it is now 4th March.This is causing me to know Nark buisness which I have no wish for any tie to. Please sort immediatly----- Original Message ----- From: "Web Drive Support" <support>To: <nark>Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:36 AMSubject: [#MTF-220566]: nark.org.nz</nark></support>

      > Hello Jim>> We are getting a request from Cherie Sweeney to move her site from your > reseller plan.> We seek your permission to do this before we can assist her.>> There is a suspension on your account at the present moment, and your > sites are down as a result. We have contacted you on this matter, but so > far had no response.>> Regards
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg names edited
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎14 Dec ---Please find attached documents for tonights meeting.Please note yhat the T shirt acc is not among these documents, this will be discussed at meeting.Also not included is Cherie's actuall phone accountRegardsCarolyn Cragg(Interum) TreasurerN.A.R.K
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg Please stop these emails coming to me ----- Original Message ----- From: N.A.R.K New Zealand To: jim.co.nz ; nark@\.nz ; kenny@givealittle.co.nz Cc: Roberta Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 5:22 AMSubject: Re: NARK Givealittle Account Change

      Tena Koe Jim and Kenny, 

      Can someone please update as to the updated login details and password as I still have no access to this Give a little site so will be unable to present reports and documentation as required for auditing purposes.

      I would like to see this resolved asap This has been an outstanding issue for toooo long.

      .If these issues cannot be resolved legal proceeding will follow.

      Sincerely

      Cherie Sweeney Founder NARKwww.nark.org.nzPhone

      On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jim 

      Hi Kenny

      Hope you had a restful festive season.

      Due to changes in the finance section of NARK we need to change the account number to the following for all payments in the future. I have attached an image of the account details to which funds need to be credited to each month.

      Also can the contact e mail address be changed to cherie@

      Many thanks for your help.

      Regards

      Jimmy

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: Kenny @ Givealittle [mailto:kenny@givealittle.co.nz] Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 10:53 PMTo: nark@Subject: RE: Contact Us Enquiry

      Hi Jimmy

      We seem to be having problems with the NARK account. I have asked our dev team to look into it. For now can you email the old bank account number so I can make a manual change for Decembers bank file.

      Thanks Kenny

      From: contact@givealittle.co.nz [mailto:contact@givealittle.co.nz] Sent: Monday, 12 December 2011 6:35 p.m.To: kenny@givealittle.co.nzSubject: Contact Us Enquiry

      Contact Us EnquiryFirst Name: Jimmy Last Name: Email Name: nark@.co.nz Phone number: Preferred contact method: email Comment: Hi there. We need to change details for the funds deposits as well as the core e mail address/login. Details are as follows Login Was nark@.nz New login e mail address - donation@.nz New bank account details National Bank -- Stratford N.A.R.K
      4 hours ago · Like


    • False Peoplesuck So you were receiving emails from give a little right up until march?
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg Yes
      4 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Helena West so caro is this the reason for the discrepency of the 2,000 + from thegive a little site and the account statement nark posted...was the money going into cherie/wavees personal account?
      4 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg I have posted the account details that the money held in the Nark National bank was transferred to the account at Ngrawahia , some information is for an accountant to answer, I am not avoiding, I am saying that the amount was clearly visable as to what was in the official account , from the date that account was opened -- we were waitng for funds in another account to go to that account, $1000 of which was deposited on 6th Jan2012
      4 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Helena West thanks caro...this is ndeed sheading light on the subject xx
      4 hours ago · Like


    • False Peoplesuck Excuse me for being a bit lost. I understand that during your time as treasurer all you did re donations etc is open a bank account ( to collate any floating monies) - may I ask with what money ( from where or whom) did that account OPEN? And how many ( $ amount) was expected to be collated? Vs the expected amount - what WAS deposited? ( what is the outstanding amount and what/who had that money? 

      Does that make sense?
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg Yes it makes sence, The account was opened with $100 I made at a barbaque, well really a donation cos being fair no real profit:) $15 odd from give a little , $1000 on 6th an 2012 being approx $1900 less than expected , I will at some stage today find the exact amounts that should have been transfered by 12 th Dec
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • False Peoplesuck Was that to be transferred from an earlier NARK account? Silly question- who was the previous treasurer?
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Caro Cragg Jim Bosewll, post on other thread, will put here
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Caro Cragg Morning

      I will get onto this when I get home tonight.

      I will get my accountant to prepare and e mail the Close-off statement to the NARK Interim management team.

      Cheers and have a great Friday 

      Jimmy J

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: Carolyn Cragg [mailto:craggo@xtra.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 8:38 PMTo: Jim Boswell; Katrina & Dave; Roberta KarangaroaSubject: Nark Account

      Dear Jimmy,

      please see below details of the new N.A.R.K bank account.

      Transfer of the funds being looked after in your account for N.A.R.K are urgently required - would appreciate if you could give it your urgent attention.Also if a close off statment could please be sent so as to safegaurd both you and N.A.R.K

      Please use reference -- Jimmy -- Nark funds

      National Bank -- Stratford

      N.A.R.K 

      06 0757 0069309 00

      Thank You Jimmy

      Kind Regards

      Carolyn
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Caro Cragg ‎16 Dec----Hi there

      I have signed the withdrawal slip and Carol will complete the bank transfer. Sorry for the delay I had to wait for her to get back so this could be completed.

      Jimmy

      Regards

      Jimmy
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎20 Dec -----Hi there

      Carol is back today and will complete the transfer. I apologise for the delay. She has been tied up with loosing a close family member over the last couple of weeks. 

      I am shooting photos for the next few days and will keep an eye on thing as I can. She will let me know when its done and I will advise.

      Caro, best of luck for today, I will say some prayers for a great result today.

      Best wishes

      Jimmy

      Regards

      Jimmy
      3 hours ago · Like


    • False Peoplesuck That's a huge delay in time? Why? When the transfer was made and the missing money NOT deposited- were other members concerned??
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎31 Dec ----- was able to complete the transfer last night as I will most probably not be out of hospital today.

      I have attached the onlive confirmation of the transaction.

      I so very much appologise for the delay. Looks like I will have some spare time on my hands now so maybe I can focus on web stuff.

      See how you all feel.

      Hope everyone has a great New Year

      Jimmy

      Regards

      Jimmy
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎5th Jan ---Hi

      I checked just now and I saw that the money didn’t transfer over. What has happened is that the transfer was set to go and in the system but it seems that end of month 8ank fees came out at the end of the month, Dec that took the balance just below the amount to be transferred so it didn’t go through due to this.

      I have completed another electronic transfer just now as per attached docket. I could not believe this when I saw. I should have considered the bank fees, end of month but it didn’t even enter my mind.

      Can you check tomorrow morning and confirm that you have the funds. I can see NO reason for this not to happen tonight and be available in the new account. I apologise for this additional delay but I can so no reason that there will be any more problems

      Regards

      Jimmy
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎5th Jan -I called the bank and they advised me that this was the case and they have said that it will go through tonight without delay or problems.

      Regards

      Jimmy

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: JimSubject: Money Transfer

      Hi

      I checked just now and I saw that the money didn’t transfer over. What has happened is that the transfer was set to go and in the system but it seems that end of month 8ank fees came out at the end of the month, Dec that took the balance just below the amount to be transferred so it didn’t go through due to this.

      I have completed another electronic transfer just now as per attached docket. I could not believe this when I saw. I should have considered the bank fees, end of month but it didn’t even enter my mind.

      Can you check tomorrow morning and confirm that you have the funds. I can see NO reason for this not to happen tonight and be available in the new account. I apologise for this additional delay but I can so no reason that there will be any more problems

      Regards

      Jimmy
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg ‎6th Jan -----I just want to say I will get this matter resolved today. It has to be sorted so NARK can move on and I don’t want this issue to get out of hand for my careers sake. If I don’t sort it this is the sort of thing that could kill my career as I have such a public profile in my business. I have a wedding to chef for today/night but I will make the time to sort this

      Jimmy

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: CarolynSent: Friday, January 06, 2012 8:28 AMTo: Roberta Subject: no funds

      As of 8.25am Friday 5th Jan 2012, no funds have shown in Nark bank account. I will ring the bank this morning to make sure what the transaction time will be from West/pac to National bank
      3 hours ago · Like


    • False Peoplesuck Holds breath and waits...
      3 hours ago · Like


    • Caro Cragg th Jan----Hi there

      I will have money in the account before 4.30 today. I have my work sorted and will be heading off from that soon on a break to do the deposit.

      I will e mail when I have deposited the moneys. I will be very busy with the wedding chefing after 4.30 but I will try and get online on FB later to make sute you have received the monies.

      Regards

      Jimmy

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: Roberta Karangaroa Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:35 PMTo: jimSubject: RE: no funds

      Get this long standing issue sorted Jimmy enough is enough!!!! 

      It goes like this jimmy take the time off to organise your obligation to NARK National Board and or take the conqunces for what comes from lack of integrity ...... I need not say any more to you I am sure you have a clear articulate mind to understand clearly what I am meaning here it’s your reputation at stake here !!!!! walk the talk act on your email and verbal communications it’s sickening to say the least, I await a response 

      Roberta

      From: Jim Boswell [mailto:jim@Subject: RE: no funds

      I will be going into Wellington City at 11.30. I will go into the bank as see exactly whats going on. I don’t know what to say right at this moment so embarrassing for me and frustrating for all of you. I will report back as soon as I can
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • False Peoplesuck Are these email in regard to the initial $1000 or the 'unaccounted' funds?
      3 hours ago · Like ·  1


    • Caro Cragg We were awaiting all due funds, $1000 was deposited-----NOW YOU ALL SEE I TELL ONLY THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      3 hours ago · Unlike ·  3


    • Rosemary Kev Keay Ive just found this page and it really sucks. This has gone on to long.
      2 hours ago · Like

    • Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Thank you Rosemary, we are getting some clarification to this issue. You are free to stay if you wish or you can unlike. Either way its your choice my friend ;)
      32 minutes ago · Like


    • Jay Walker Yeah about time this crap stopped Cherie front up an answer the f**ken questions you have been asked shame on you for having Caro put herself in this position do you have no respect as I see from these post Caro did all possible to help Nark and all you have done is shit on her I sorry but you have shown to be the biggest bitch ever and I won't hold my tongue was prepared to give you benefit of doubt but no more your a scamming cow and karma will get your arse I do pitty Wavee blinded by live he must be as he hasn't seen you for what we see you for
      18 minutes ago · Like


    • Jay Walker Should be LOVE
      17 minutes ago · Like

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Next post:


      Caro Cragg
      Admin are you still happy for posts to continue
      Unlike ·  · 4 hours ago ·  
      •  

      • You and 2 others like this.

        • Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Yes continue Caro, its good to get this all cleared up.
          4 hours ago · Unlike ·  1


        • Caro Cragg With all that is being posted by every body == it has to be said this is still going to be a he said, she said, I have edited some names to protect people and there addresses, I was put at risk by publication on a forum of people I did not know having my address, I will not do that to others
          4 hours ago · Unlike ·  2


        • Delete comment
          Caro Cragg 
          Morning

          I will get onto this when I get home tonight.

          I will get my accountant to prepare and e mail the Close-off statement to the NARK Interim management team.

          Cheers and have a great Friday 

          Jimmy J

          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: Carolyn Cragg [mailto:craggo@xtra.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 8:38 PMTo: Jim Boswell; Katrina & Dave; Roberta KarangaroaSubject: Nark Account

          Dear Jimmy,

          please see below details of the new N.A.R.K bank account.

          Transfer of the funds being looked after in your account for N.A.R.K are urgently required - would appreciate if you could give it your urgent attention.Also if a close off statment could please be sent so as to safegaurd both you and N.A.R.K

          Please use reference -- Jimmy -- Nark funds

          National Bank -- Stratford

          N.A.R.K 

          06 0757 0069309 00

          Thank You Jimmy

          Kind Regards

          Carolyn
          3 hours ago · Like

Like ·  · Share · Delete



    Natalie Whittington So did that money ever get transferred?


      Monday at 14:09 · Like ·  1


          Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Thats what we dont know Natalie Whittington sadly, again only Nark and Cherie would know what happened. But I do know that Jimmy resigned quite recently from the board and from Nark.

          Monday at 14:15 · Like ·  2 


          False Peoplesuck The missing funds were not recovered during Ms Craggs time as treasurer. That information is privvy to NARK. Mr Boswell was reinstated to the board at the time of resignations.

          Monday at 15:00 · Unlike ·  5



            Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Yes I thats what I find very interesting :/

            Monday at 16:08 · Like ·  1