Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Mongrel Mob Affiliated. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mongrel Mob Affiliated. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

Moments in Time: The tactics of Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney Expliots

2009 Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) and Exploitation

From the achieves:

 
In 2009 a documentary was created by TV3 60 minutes regarding girl gangs in Hastings. A huge issue was centred around the filming of the Documentary and also of "alleged" alcohol involvement.
 
No substantial evidence was forthcoming.
 
It was found that the TV3 60 minute documentary did breach privacy laws and not protecting the identities of the girls who's ages were aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16yrs of age. 
 
The full BSA Complaint and final decision can be accessed on the Hastings District Council and TV Works LTD 2009-088 link above.
 
Here is an article also about this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BSA finds girls treated unfairly in gangs item

 
 
A TV3 60 Minutes item on girl gangs in Hawke's Bay did not sufficiently protect the identities of four girls, exploited them and treated them unfairly, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found.
The broadcaster has been ordered to make an on-air apology and pay $6000 costs.
 
Hastings District Council complained about the item, which contained interviews with current and former gang members and was broadcast on April 27 last year.
 
Included in the item were four girls - one aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16 - who were shown wearing gang-style clothing. Two of the girls were shown spray painting graffiti on a basketball court and two were shown re-enacting breaking into a house.
 
The girls were not interviewed but the reporter said they had told her they were drinking and getting into fights.
 
Two of the council's six complaints were upheld, with the authority finding breaches of the privacy and fairness standards.
 
The four girls were shown with their faces covered by bandanas but during the item three of the bandanas slipped, exposing the girls' faces.
The authority said that even if the bandanas had not slipped, it did not agree with the broadcaster that they provided sufficient protection of their identity.
 
"Viewers could see the top half of the girls' faces including their eyes, nose and hair colour. In addition, several full length shots of the girls showed their body shapes and distinctive clothing," the decision said.
 
The three girls under 16 were not old enough to consent to a broadcast that would breach their privacy the decision said and, "there is no evidence to suggest that a parent or guardian consented on their behalf..."
 
In the case of the 16-year-old, there was an understanding with the reporter that her identity would not be revealed and the authority did not find the bandana to be a sufficient disguise.
 
"The authority considers that the broadcaster reneged on an understanding not to reveal the girls' identities, and thereby disclosed private facts in a highly offensive manner about four young girls, three of whom were children," the decision said.
 
On the issue of unfairness, the decision said that the young girls were exposed as participating in criminal and anti-social behaviour when the broadcaster had agreed not to identify them.
The authority found the broadcaster failed to appreciate the harm the item could cause to the reputations and futures of the young girls.
 
"In this respect, the authority is of the view that the broadcast exploited the girls, due to their young age and lack of appreciation for the consequences of their actions, and unnecessarily identified them. It considers that all four girls were treated unfairly."
 
The authority ordered TVWorks Ltd to broadcast a summary of the decision within a month and to pay complainant costs of $3560.12 and Crown costs of $2500.
- NZPA
 
Another article in the 3 News NZ website. Please click in the link.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Mrs Roberta Karangaroa's input on this issue and also that she had "heard"  alcohol was being provided to the girls by the 60 minutes crew during filming.
 
TV team in booze row
   

Television news show 60 Minutes denies allegations it bought alcohol for a group of young Hawke's Bay women interviewed for its story Girls in the Hood which screened on TV3 on Sunday.
 
Instead, the producer of the show said the 60 Minutes team was invited to attend a party and took along a small quantity of alcohol "in the customary way".

Executive producer Terrence Taylor said the party was held by an adult and took place after all the interviews had been completed.

"No other alcohol was given to anyone," he said in written replies to Hawke's Bay Today.

Hastings Mayor Lawrence Yule said he was disappointed with the way the story on girl gangs portrayed Hastings, Napier and in particular Flaxmere.

"I'm just trying to stand up for a part of my community that has been shafted by a journalist from outside the area," he said.

Mr Yule said it had appeared to him the young girls interviewed had been supplied alcohol as a prop for the story. They were filmed drinking a bottle of Johnny Walker whisky.

Today he was meeting Riverslea Community Trust spokeswoman Roberta Karangaroa to talk about their options, which may include a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council.

Ms Karangaroa, who works with youth, said she also had heard a bottle of alcohol had been bought by 60 Minutes and given to the girls to drink while they were filmed for the story.

Mr Yule and Ms Karangaroa were upset the girls had been asked to re-enact a burglary on the show.

Mr Taylor said the girls 60 Minutes interviewed did act out a burglary scene but re-enactments were often used in current affairs shows.

" ... and we are sure that viewers would see from the way it was filmed that this was clearly re-enacted," he said.

Mr Taylor said 60 Minutes did not say there were limited services available to help girls in gangs back on to the straight and narrow.

"A participant in the story, a knowledgeable expert on girl 'crews', suggested that young women are attracted to these groups because they don't receive enough support elsewhere.
This was her honest opinion," he said.

Mr Taylor said the 60 Minutes team did seek comment from the Maori community in the course of researching the story.

"We spoke to a community group, who agreed that girl crews are a problem in the area," he said.

"We stand by the story, which we believe highlighted a serious issue. In the light of the interest that it seems to have created, we are considering returning to do a follow-up," he said.

Obscene language had been displayed on the 60 Minutes website from bloggers leaving comments about the Girls in the Hood story.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here are the paragraphs related to Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) from the BSA  site.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney was known as a fixer (paid as an assistant).  As pointed out, she received $1,000 dollars for this job.  This is something  she had stated last year that, she had done this on a voluntary basis.  Here is her admittance of being involved:



From her post she had said:

"I helped girlgangs that were causing havoc in our communities as I felt that these girls could be helped if pointed in the right direction.   "This was ALL voluntary."

More from our previous post of this is issue here

From the BSA website:

Complainant

[24]   The HDC argued that the programme’s makers had relied on one of the women interviewed to conduct research for the item, including interviewing the mayor and local MPs, but it noted that none of this “research” occurred. It said that the broadcaster had told the HDC that the woman was an assistant producer who owned her own media company, and alleged that she was paid $1,000 for organising the story. The complainant considered the woman to be unreliable and stated that the broadcaster had taken no steps to check what research she had done.

The Broadcasters Response

[43]   Turning to the $1000 payment made to one of the women for organising the story, the broadcaster stated that the woman ran her own company and had worked for the media in the past. It said she was paid as an assistant or “fixer” to introduce the reporter to people in the area. TVWorks considered that the payment was “entirely legitimate” and reasonable considering her knowledge of girl gangs. It stated that another of the women interviewed had been paid $200 plus a small sum of lunch money for her and the other girls being filmed. It said that the woman’s car had been used in several scenes and that the reporter had “filled the tank”.

Authority's Determination

Contracting the “fixer” and the nature of the item overall
[101]   With respect to 60 Minutes’ use of a “fixer”, the Authority is satisfied with TVWorks’ explanation of why it employed a person to make contacts for the reporter so that she could conduct interviews and obtain other material for the story.
 
Why would she again lie about this being voluntary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Former gang girl hits back

 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 She had also stated in this Media article that....

"Cheriek Kara, a mother of two who is working towards her master's degree in Maori and management, featured as a reformed teen gang member on the current affairs show alongside present gang members trying to change their lifestyles."

When asked if she had completed her studies and gained her Masters Degree, nothing was produced.  

This picture was given by a close family member who posted this one of the many pages that Ms Cherie had removed. 

When it comes to exploitation of monies for her "causes" she certainly makes sure to get paid.


Cherie and Michael
  There is more to this story which will be posted in due time.



 

Saturday, 4 January 2014

Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney and N.A.R.K 2014


Web Scam Report from last year Jan 2013: 

Link here: Nark Web Scam Report
























We are now into the New Year 2014,  Ms Cherie's N.A.R.K Org.nz remains unregistered, but still on the Give a little Website.  Ms Cherie stills posts on our page sometimes but nothing forth-coming concerning the mismanagement of monies or that of her and her "Orgs"current situation in NZ regarding the serious issue of Child Abuse. 

There has been a new Blog put up on behalf of Ms Cherie but nothing substantial in the whole N.A.R.K/ Cherie Sweeney debacle of providing proven answers to our concerns.

The blog site is here:


Its quite concerning though that the author of this blog believes that with Ms Cherie's post's on Facebook from time to time, it seems evident enough in helping toward the Child Abuse issue.   

It certainly takes a great deal more to help address this issue, other then posting now and again on a page. Its about getting out in the community and getting involved with families and helping those who are at risk.

Yes, this means getting in and actually helping, Ms Cherie. Just media appearances or creating hui's that require people to donate monies, with no record keeping is plain, opportunistic. Not to mention using the most serious issue in NZ and emotionally sway the public to contribute money to you, to finance your hidden lifestyle, is quite disturbing.  Certainly unprofessional in any "Org, Charity, Trust or whatever you call your unregistered N.A.R.K Org.Nz."

On that note, there has also been a new development regarding the http://www.nark.org.nz/ website....

Not sure whats going on there (but we keep a note on what is found), so time will tell with this strange site. Developed in November 2013.

NARK.ORG.NZ A business site:









Friday, 5 April 2013

Children, Gangs and Cherie Sweeney

NZ Public needing Answers from Cherie: 


What about these children, Cherie seems to make a mockery of the first child.

(The little boy was on her gang page along with her two other profiles pages, on Bebo). We have questioned her about this child from the beginning, however she still refuses to explain but instead makes it into some kind of game.

But what of the two older boys? Children don’t have choices, Adults do!!.

How can Cherie be an Advocate against Child Abuse, yet she holds dear to her gang? Gangs are lawless, they have their own rules. Children of Gang Members are exposed to that lifestyle, taught and grow up thinking this is normal.

During this whole saddening situation, we did eventually find out, she is indeed, currently a Mongrel Mob member and had been for many years.

Of all the attacks on our previous 7 pages, many of the NZ Public’s personal profile pages were attacked, reported etc… these were the innocent people of the NZ Public.

Some were still supporters of Cherie, but even they were attacked too. We all were asking questions out of extreme concern, but Cherie and company were and still are currently trying anything, to silence all.

If Cherie was “Helping heal the Gang from the inside,” then why did she not acknowledge this Publicly, at the beginning? The NZ Public would of understood.

But instead Cherie is so intent, on attacking anyone, who even spoke out (previously) about her and her gang and continues to do so, even today.

What of the issue of accountability as to where all monies received by Cherie and Nark are and have gone too, since its beginnings?…..NZ Public are still wanting for Answers with Evidence today…its been a year.

For some even longer….

For a person who had once said, she was very Transparent along with her “Fake” Charity, Org, Trust etc (whatever she calls it) ,we can certainly see, there has been NO Transparency of both NARK and Cherie, from the beginning.

We had also noticed an interesting spin regarding Cherie (Founder), Pete George (Political Climber) , and Roberta Karangaroa (Chair Person) of Nark, and how they were all trying to sweep this whole mess under the carpet.

Their replies were:

“Lets just focus on the Child Abuse Cause” (basically move on and not say anything more). Anyone with common-sense would realise this is a tactic used to, “Just sweep this under the Carpet” by using “Emotions” to detract from the serious issue at hand.

The NZ Public are greatly concerned with the Child Abuse Issue in NZ. We certainly wouldn't have with of been with N.A.R.K or any other Org, if we weren't very dedicated to this extremely serious issue in NZ .

Yes, we were all once very strong supporters of Cherie and N.A.R.K. but once things were not as they seemed with Cherie, N.A.R.K and the Chair Person Roberta Karangaroa its was becoming very, lets say.... Very Unprofessional!

As soon as Members started asking questions as to what is going on in the Nark Group page and receiving no evidence, we all started realizing, there was something very wrong here….. Things were also not right with the professionalism of Cherie nor that of Roberta.

Where was Cherie, when all her workers were doing the ground work?

Then after her public ”Mortgage Plea”, who did she blame, when the NZ Public were requiring answers?

She blamed her very own workers, which she was quite happy to take credit for their work, especially when she wasn't even there doing the hard Mahi.

Here is the break down of the Voxy article, posted last year for more understanding on this matter.

Cherie has said so many untruths, her credibility is greatly questionable.

The link Transcript of what happened that night is on our blog here. Members were threatened with defamation, if anyone spoke out about this, also members were being deleted for requiring answers. Some of the members who were not on line that evening were deleted too. Very usual.

This is a serious issue that the NZ Public will not be silent on.

Will we ever know what happened to these children, or if they will get help? 

Post from our page below:  

Ms Cherie (What ever you name is?) Can you please confirm who this child is in the picture?
Like ·  · 





1Like ·  · 
  • Rochelle Horo-maihi likes this.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? I think Cherie can explain this.....
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Explain what?? I dont know these kids BUT Im gonna find out... like wtf? Where did you get photos from? I know you dont have the balls to hit them up about it BUT I DO
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? No profanities please Ms Cherie Nark, they are from the Napier Chapter. You know this. Yet you and your husband are still affiliated with the Mob and yet you proclaim your against child abuse? Which is it Ms Cherie? You happily turn a blind eye to children who are exposed to what these children have been exposed too (hence the photo) . Yet you are standing against abuse of children? Please Answer honestly Cherie, because we know your children are (with evidence) exposed too and growing up in the gang culture that you hold so dear too. Which one is it??
  • Mack Gemmell This irritates me. I am gang affiliated, but im not in a gang, so does that make me a bad person? No! Im engaged and have a son (whom i dont abuse) have never been to jail or had any criminal convictions and work my arse off to get what i want. Dont be so quick to judge.
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Napier aye? maybe they live by ol Princess Mandula then. My whole family are Mob affiliated yet here I am not abusing my kids or letting it happen to others, I actually do something about it, not sit on a computer and complain and try to make someone else feel like crap. My Family are Gang affiliated with 4 different gangs yet my kids are very happy loved and successful kids Im proud of my daughter at 16 will be doing some university papers while completing her level 3 ncea. nobody turns a blind eye unless you count this page that rants about it but does nothing
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Thank you Mack Gemmell again for your message. This issue however lays with MsCherie Nark. The NZ Public have been waiting for answers with proof from her for nearly a whole year now. Our questions are in our notes. Ms Cherie, question time for you: What have you actually done about abused children apart from being the "face",gallivant around attending hui's, media etc.... How is that helping children in great need of help? Why have there been no accountability of where any monies have gone too? When money first started coming in, Why did you not set up the trust account properly regarding your fake N.A.R.K Org, trust or other? Why do you take credit for others hard work? Again we ask, What abused child or family have you helped directly? Why do you continually lie? The NZ Public can't believe anything you say anymore, which reflects badly on your fake Org. Please don't bring your family into this, as they aren't the ones who used Child Abuse for their personal gain, you did. What do you actually do Ms Cherie?
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark What a load of bollocks, you sound like a broken record even when you have your "answers" why dont you actually check out what I am doing instead of assuming, This page is a fake page, full of likes from your fake various names you create. You dont represent any Public or NZ sheez you dont even care about kids or anything this page is to bring me down nothing else and its not working
  • Quentin Makoare Cooper Cherie sweeny iz a very talentd caring individual shez alwayz bn dea 4 da peopl i knw 4 a fact i waz gna b a gang memba til dat beutiful ladie cme along n showd me da rght directionz n life shez gota heart of gold i thnk ur jst jelous n obsessd all i gota say cherie iz kp up da gud work ma friend n 2 dat person runing dat bulshit page y dnt u jst fuk off n wory whtz n ur own bk yard clwn
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz?
    14 hours ago
    Just a message from Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd for the NZ Public:
    She will be taking a break for rest. 

    Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd

    I am feeling so guilty because I haven't finished that yet, and it's entirely my responsibility, not Cherie's. We (Kiwilaw) had a setback at the end of last year when we almost negotiated a resolution with the Ministry of Justice about reinstatement as a legal-aid provider, and then the agreement fell through at the last minute. Mid January we reached agreement again and then it didn't work either. Each setback meant a drop in energy (and also the need to put more time into those issues instead of finishing off this work for you and Cherie). Finally the legal-aid provider approval is in place, and THAT has meant more distraction because of having to redo paperwork and inform clients. (You'll note that we haven't even put a notification on Facebook about it - that's a comment on the energy levels and the juggling at present). Oh yes, and the diary was thrown into chaos after a 5-minute judicial conference turned into 2 days (Judge Cocurullo does that sometimes). And I have a sudden cluster of court deadlines this week. I was going to spend tomorrow (Anniversary Day) catching up, but I've decided I need to take time for myself and so I'm not going to spend it working. (Right now, it's 11 pm and I'm about to email submissions to Wellington that were due on Friday. That's quite enough, for now.)
    Sunday at 23:05
  • Nikolasa Biasiny-Tule I'm sorry, but the fact that Cherie is using money to promote a message (what you call galavanting) that is VERY new in many whanau and critical to ending violence against children (i.e. that narking is ok and to do it) doesn't bother me at all, if her charity's aim is raise awareness and she is making her way around the country doing this (regardless of that fact that she has something to do with a gang - sorry what whanau doesn't! Nothing you said has me concerned AT ALL - plus YOU HIDE, we don't know who you are or what your agenda is.
  • Nikolasa Biasiny-Tule oh AND - you ask "why didn't she do A, B, C" IF this is the case it may be because it's ALL NEW, setting up an organisation is insanely complicated (and to be fair, I don't thinkCherie (correct me if I'm wrong) knew in the beginning how big it would become) we started our business years ago and know how damn hard it is to organise while working 24/7. she has stood up and done something that few have done before, incredibly admirable in my eyes - you are just a hater with far too much time on your hands.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Please read our blog, I am sure she is quite familiar with the works and knowledge of Charities. Along with her helper or Aunty Roberta.
  • Jay Walker Pretty sad post pics of children that are not yours as a parent i'd be horrified to see my children pics uses on a hate page
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? No Jay Walker quite disturbing is the term and this is what Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark is quite familiar with. Especially when she has had a long history with the gang and is still a current member. Is this Child Abuse Cherie? Or doesn't it apply with your commitment with your gang? That is disturbing, and these children along with many others are taught that this normal. This is their upbringing. Its all they know, Cherie knows this.
  • Nikolasa Biasiny-Tule I've reported the photo. Regardless of your reasons, it's not on to post photos of children who aren't yours AND when you have not been given explicit permission to do so. @Jay I suggest you do the same.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Ms Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark did you find out who these children are? This is abuse of children and needs to be addressed please.
  • Parents who are abused by children I agree this is abuse and who ever aloud these children to be holding guns and patched has to have serious mental health issues. Shame Cyfs has not stepped up on this one.
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Thank you and welcome to our page Parents who are abused by children Facebook. We are glad that you can see this too. We encourage anyone and everyone to report this authorities and please help these children. These children still have hope and this is a major concern. Thank you greatfully.





Like ·  · 
  • Jan Curtis and Princess Mandula like this.
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Lols No heres how it goes My mum married a couple times so my family are Smith-Robinsons and Tahuparaes (my brother and sisters) I was also whangai to another whanau so yes must be confusing with names but legally my name was atrociously... (shouldnt really say that its in my sister and brothers names too)... long C.E.M.K.S.Kara See patent (blame my parents lols), Then took Mikes name legally and shortened my name at the same time. Does that help? Whaea Tia knew my older brother so probly thought I had Tahuparae in my name? Anyway I helped and wrote her an affidavit and helped to get her a parenting order sorted from Family Court - and how did I do that ???? dunno but I taught myself using websites on family and Family Court  So yes very pro-active am I
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Hello Cherie Nark, long time no contact. So are you married to Mike, as you previously stated? Your quite Pro- Active indeed, which brings us to another issue....Its been almost a whole year and the NZ Public are still awaiting evidenced answers and proof from you and your "Unregistered Org, Charity, Trust or whatever you prefer to call it". When will we get clarification on that please? What has happened to your "Pro Bono" Lawyer Ms Sheryl? Is she still depressed and in capable of fulfilling her duties, on your behalf? When will we get word from her? Although I do have concerns regarding her professionalism, but I guess that's what you get when you don't have to pay for one perhaps.... Oh one more thing, and this is the most important question, What child or family have you directly helped through your fake Org?
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Ive done my part to contributing all nark documents to hold my head up high. But unless you yourself have done anything that has really helped another, and this aint it, then you really have no place to ask anything of me, you have been given answers that are real, and for you to put another down when they only wish to help and support shows the 20 of you are not really achieving what you hoped to do - and that was bring me down. Thanks to your put downs of a another, I wont reply to this page or it "members" anymore, its obviously hopeless, you will never be happy, I dont think that about all your members just the viscious ones lols PS and this is the most important statement I will not be breaching anyones privacy for you or anyone unless they say its ok. Bye
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? We aren't the ones Ms Cherie Nark (whatever your first, middle, last name is), that have and are still using abused children for a profit/ income/wage/ media lime light/attention seeking and self serving purposes as yourself. 

    Thats all you Lady!! If you can hold your head up high about that, well its best you get your head out of the clouds and step into the real world lady. Your a great manipulator, I give you that, for your great "victim" performance you use so often, its just as predicable as your many alias names lol. While your trying to grasp what spotlight you think you have left, you can be assured the NZ Public will oppose you and your "fake Org" future endeavours. 

    If your not concerned with the numbers on this page Ms Cherie (Whatever your last name is) why are you even bothered coming on here or looking at our page lol? Such a drama queen lady. 

    Well that's the respect we get from Ms Cherie, NZ Public!!. As long as you give her money, she's an angel but once you start to query her as to where the money is and has been going too? Then out come her threats, abuse oh and defamation suits lol. 

    Good Grief Cherie, you and your husband need to get a real job and stop bludging off the NZ Public for your "extravagant lifestyle'. By the way, have some respect and stop wearing your gang colours especially at events, totally disgraceful. 

    Please get some help lady, for your compulsive lying habit, we've had so many "Nek Minnet moments" regarding your answers with NO proof its getting quite ridiculous. Now this may be a shock to you Ms Cherie but the Child Abuse issue in NZ, is actually NOT ABOUT YOU. 

    The real victims are those children and you are (and have been) trying to cash in on, just like your community noticed from the beginning. Disgraceful!! Now, that you made it public for want of money and the NZ Public have given money freely and from their hearts around NZ, this makes it a National Issue regarding what you have been doing and trying to do. 

    Find another way to make your money, better still and YES!! (I shall repeat this again), this may be a REAL shock for you and your husband but get a JOB. It's sounds like a strange concept but YES!! it actually helps you pay your bills etc....

    Marvellous what a good hard day at Mahi does!! Now that's REAL Mana!! Kia Ora!! 
  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue Mahi like establishing and maintaining Let's Get Growing NZ FOCKCer community gardens! Providing REAL kai for the kids - you can hold our head up can you? After spending all the NARK money on yourself and your hare brained "NARK t shirt" scheme - ignoring the fact that the whole NARK message is in direct contradiction to the fact that the dysfunctional police and so called community agencies are the worst offenders - and nothing is being done about it and the offenders are being promoted! 

    You spent the money on yourself - your food, your accommodation, travel, your bills, buyuing yourself a computer so you could spread your silly little facebook message and indulge in your shameless, narcissistic self promotion - get a REAL job!
  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark Arent you a 1 man band with your Fockers Kate? who else is in Fockers in Carterton??
  • Mischeski Theresa so cheree what happened to the help pay your mortage page?and did your mortage get paid?dam wish someone would pay mine 
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? And strangely they (Cherie and Partner) were able to get their personal business up and running the month before. Very unusual, but still no answers from Cherie again. No surprises there though 
  • Mischeski Theresa awaiting reply re they Facebook' pay your mortgages page cheree??????
  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Would you mindMischeski Theresa if I posted your question on our page? Although you will be waiting like we have (nearly a year) but worth a try I guess. Just be prepared she my say you are not the public of NZ. She always uses that to detract from the issue.




Hello NZ Public, so just reposting a conversation last night with Cherie who graced us with her presence last night.... Post as follows or on the link under this:

Cherie Nark Lols No heres how it goes My mum married a couple times so my family are Smith-Robinsons and Tahuparaes (my brother and sisters) I was also whangai to another whanau so yes must be confusing with names but legally my name was atrociously... (shouldnt really say that its in my sister and brothers names too)... long C.E.M.K.S.Kara See patent (blame my parents lols), Then took Mikes name legally and shortened my name at the same time. Does that help? Whaea Tia knew my older brother so probly thought I had Tahuparae in my name? Anyway I helped and wrote her an affidavit and helped to get her a parenting order sorted from Family Court - and how did I do that ???? dunno but I taught myself using websites on family and Family Court So yes very pro-active am I
16 hours ago · Edited · Like

Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Hello Cherie Nark, long time no contact. So are you married to Mike, as you previously stated? Your quite Pro- Active indeed, which brings us to another issue....Its been almost a whole year and the NZ Public are still awaiting evidenced answers and proof from you and your "Unregistered Org, Charity, Trust or whatever you prefer to call it". When will we get clarification on that please? What has happened to your "Pro Bono" Lawyer Ms Sheryl? Is she still depressed and in capable of fulfilling her duties, on your behalf? When will we get word from her? Although I do have concerns regarding her professionalism, but I guess that's what you get when you don't have to pay for one perhaps.... Oh one more thing, and this is the most important question, What child or family have you directly helped through your fake Org?
19 hours ago · Like

Cherie Nark Ive done my part to contributing all nark documents to hold my head up high. But unless you yourself have done anything that has really helped another, and this aint it, then you really have no place to ask anything of me, you have been given answers t...See More
18 hours ago · Like

Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? We aren't the ones Ms Cherie Nark (whatever your first, middle, last name is), that have and are still using abused children for a profit/ income/wage/ media lime light/attention seeking and self serving purposes as yourself.

Thats all you Lady!! If you can hold your head up high about that, well its best you get your head out of the clouds and step into the real world lady. Your a great manipulator, I give you that, for your great "victim" performance you use so often, its just as predicable as your many alias names lol. While your trying to grasp what spotlight you think you have left, you can be assured the NZ Public will oppose you and your "fake Org" future endeavours.

If your not concerned with the numbers on this page Ms Cherie (Whatever your last name is) why are you even bothered coming on here or looking at our page lol? Such a drama queen lady.

Well that's the respect we get from Ms Cherie, NZ Public!!. As long as you give her money, she's an angel but once you start to query her as to where the money is and has been going too? Then out come her threats, abuse oh and defamation suits lol.

Good Grief Cherie, you and your husband need to get a real job and stop bludging off the NZ Public for your "extravagant lifestyle'. By the way, have some respect and stop wearing your gang colours especially at events, totally disgraceful.

Please get some help lady, for your compulsive lying habit, we've had so many "Nek Minnet moments" regarding your answers with NO proof its getting quite ridiculous. Now this may be a shock to you Ms Cherie but the Child Abuse issue in NZ, is actually NOT ABOUT YOU.

The real victims are those children and you are (and have been) trying to cash in on, just like your community noticed from the beginning. Disgraceful!! Now, that you made it public for want of money and the NZ Public have given money freely and from their hearts around NZ, this makes it a National Issue regarding what you have been doing and trying to do.

Find another way to make your money, better still and YES!! (I shall repeat this again), this may be a REAL shock for you and your husband but get a JOB. It's sounds like a strange concept but YES!! it actually helps you pay your bills etc....

Marvellous what a good hard day at Mahi does!! Now that's REAL Mana!! Kia Ora!!
17 hours ago · Like
Like ·  ·