Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Money. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Money. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

Moments in Time: The tactics of Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney Expliots

2009 Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) and Exploitation

From the achieves:

 
In 2009 a documentary was created by TV3 60 minutes regarding girl gangs in Hastings. A huge issue was centred around the filming of the Documentary and also of "alleged" alcohol involvement.
 
No substantial evidence was forthcoming.
 
It was found that the TV3 60 minute documentary did breach privacy laws and not protecting the identities of the girls who's ages were aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16yrs of age. 
 
The full BSA Complaint and final decision can be accessed on the Hastings District Council and TV Works LTD 2009-088 link above.
 
Here is an article also about this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BSA finds girls treated unfairly in gangs item

 
 
A TV3 60 Minutes item on girl gangs in Hawke's Bay did not sufficiently protect the identities of four girls, exploited them and treated them unfairly, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found.
The broadcaster has been ordered to make an on-air apology and pay $6000 costs.
 
Hastings District Council complained about the item, which contained interviews with current and former gang members and was broadcast on April 27 last year.
 
Included in the item were four girls - one aged 12 or 13, two aged 15 and one aged 16 - who were shown wearing gang-style clothing. Two of the girls were shown spray painting graffiti on a basketball court and two were shown re-enacting breaking into a house.
 
The girls were not interviewed but the reporter said they had told her they were drinking and getting into fights.
 
Two of the council's six complaints were upheld, with the authority finding breaches of the privacy and fairness standards.
 
The four girls were shown with their faces covered by bandanas but during the item three of the bandanas slipped, exposing the girls' faces.
The authority said that even if the bandanas had not slipped, it did not agree with the broadcaster that they provided sufficient protection of their identity.
 
"Viewers could see the top half of the girls' faces including their eyes, nose and hair colour. In addition, several full length shots of the girls showed their body shapes and distinctive clothing," the decision said.
 
The three girls under 16 were not old enough to consent to a broadcast that would breach their privacy the decision said and, "there is no evidence to suggest that a parent or guardian consented on their behalf..."
 
In the case of the 16-year-old, there was an understanding with the reporter that her identity would not be revealed and the authority did not find the bandana to be a sufficient disguise.
 
"The authority considers that the broadcaster reneged on an understanding not to reveal the girls' identities, and thereby disclosed private facts in a highly offensive manner about four young girls, three of whom were children," the decision said.
 
On the issue of unfairness, the decision said that the young girls were exposed as participating in criminal and anti-social behaviour when the broadcaster had agreed not to identify them.
The authority found the broadcaster failed to appreciate the harm the item could cause to the reputations and futures of the young girls.
 
"In this respect, the authority is of the view that the broadcast exploited the girls, due to their young age and lack of appreciation for the consequences of their actions, and unnecessarily identified them. It considers that all four girls were treated unfairly."
 
The authority ordered TVWorks Ltd to broadcast a summary of the decision within a month and to pay complainant costs of $3560.12 and Crown costs of $2500.
- NZPA
 
Another article in the 3 News NZ website. Please click in the link.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Mrs Roberta Karangaroa's input on this issue and also that she had "heard"  alcohol was being provided to the girls by the 60 minutes crew during filming.
 
TV team in booze row
   

Television news show 60 Minutes denies allegations it bought alcohol for a group of young Hawke's Bay women interviewed for its story Girls in the Hood which screened on TV3 on Sunday.
 
Instead, the producer of the show said the 60 Minutes team was invited to attend a party and took along a small quantity of alcohol "in the customary way".

Executive producer Terrence Taylor said the party was held by an adult and took place after all the interviews had been completed.

"No other alcohol was given to anyone," he said in written replies to Hawke's Bay Today.

Hastings Mayor Lawrence Yule said he was disappointed with the way the story on girl gangs portrayed Hastings, Napier and in particular Flaxmere.

"I'm just trying to stand up for a part of my community that has been shafted by a journalist from outside the area," he said.

Mr Yule said it had appeared to him the young girls interviewed had been supplied alcohol as a prop for the story. They were filmed drinking a bottle of Johnny Walker whisky.

Today he was meeting Riverslea Community Trust spokeswoman Roberta Karangaroa to talk about their options, which may include a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council.

Ms Karangaroa, who works with youth, said she also had heard a bottle of alcohol had been bought by 60 Minutes and given to the girls to drink while they were filmed for the story.

Mr Yule and Ms Karangaroa were upset the girls had been asked to re-enact a burglary on the show.

Mr Taylor said the girls 60 Minutes interviewed did act out a burglary scene but re-enactments were often used in current affairs shows.

" ... and we are sure that viewers would see from the way it was filmed that this was clearly re-enacted," he said.

Mr Taylor said 60 Minutes did not say there were limited services available to help girls in gangs back on to the straight and narrow.

"A participant in the story, a knowledgeable expert on girl 'crews', suggested that young women are attracted to these groups because they don't receive enough support elsewhere.
This was her honest opinion," he said.

Mr Taylor said the 60 Minutes team did seek comment from the Maori community in the course of researching the story.

"We spoke to a community group, who agreed that girl crews are a problem in the area," he said.

"We stand by the story, which we believe highlighted a serious issue. In the light of the interest that it seems to have created, we are considering returning to do a follow-up," he said.

Obscene language had been displayed on the 60 Minutes website from bloggers leaving comments about the Girls in the Hood story.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here are the paragraphs related to Ms Cheriek Kara (Sweeney) from the BSA  site.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney was known as a fixer (paid as an assistant).  As pointed out, she received $1,000 dollars for this job.  This is something  she had stated last year that, she had done this on a voluntary basis.  Here is her admittance of being involved:



From her post she had said:

"I helped girlgangs that were causing havoc in our communities as I felt that these girls could be helped if pointed in the right direction.   "This was ALL voluntary."

More from our previous post of this is issue here

From the BSA website:

Complainant

[24]   The HDC argued that the programme’s makers had relied on one of the women interviewed to conduct research for the item, including interviewing the mayor and local MPs, but it noted that none of this “research” occurred. It said that the broadcaster had told the HDC that the woman was an assistant producer who owned her own media company, and alleged that she was paid $1,000 for organising the story. The complainant considered the woman to be unreliable and stated that the broadcaster had taken no steps to check what research she had done.

The Broadcasters Response

[43]   Turning to the $1000 payment made to one of the women for organising the story, the broadcaster stated that the woman ran her own company and had worked for the media in the past. It said she was paid as an assistant or “fixer” to introduce the reporter to people in the area. TVWorks considered that the payment was “entirely legitimate” and reasonable considering her knowledge of girl gangs. It stated that another of the women interviewed had been paid $200 plus a small sum of lunch money for her and the other girls being filmed. It said that the woman’s car had been used in several scenes and that the reporter had “filled the tank”.

Authority's Determination

Contracting the “fixer” and the nature of the item overall
[101]   With respect to 60 Minutes’ use of a “fixer”, the Authority is satisfied with TVWorks’ explanation of why it employed a person to make contacts for the reporter so that she could conduct interviews and obtain other material for the story.
 
Why would she again lie about this being voluntary?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Former gang girl hits back

 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 She had also stated in this Media article that....

"Cheriek Kara, a mother of two who is working towards her master's degree in Maori and management, featured as a reformed teen gang member on the current affairs show alongside present gang members trying to change their lifestyles."

When asked if she had completed her studies and gained her Masters Degree, nothing was produced.  

This picture was given by a close family member who posted this one of the many pages that Ms Cherie had removed. 

When it comes to exploitation of monies for her "causes" she certainly makes sure to get paid.


Cherie and Michael
  There is more to this story which will be posted in due time.



 

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

More online information about indentifying and avioding Charity Scams

Articles from America on Charity Scams:
A more in-depth look at the different kinds of Charity Scams.

Please note: the IRS or CRA (America) is equivalent to IRD in NZ.

How to Spot a Charity Scam Artist- link for article:   USA

By
 
Many kind-hearted individuals and businesses make financial donations towards the end of the year. Unfortunately, online scam artists count on this and step up their efforts to steal valuable identifying information, load your computer with viruses, and swindle donors through Email solicitation campaigns. 

 How Email Charity Scam Artists Con Donors

Scam artists send out their mass email campaigns asking for charitable donations for a variety of causes. Online scam artists have gotten more sophisticated and are no longer simply asking you to mail them information or offering a hyperlink (usually to a virus or form to input identifying information.) Many scam artists are now taking the time to develop actual "charity" websites in an attempt to convince you that they are real.
 
Before you make an online donation to any charity you are unfamiliar with check them out.

Unfortunately, not all charities are listed in the online IRS database (which is about two years behind in listing charities it has approved for tax exemption status.) If you cannot find the charity online, call the IRS or your state's tax board.
 
Typically, only multi-million dollar charities are listing in registries like GuideStar. Even the Better Business Bureau (BBB), which is now starting to list charities, is misleading, because to get your charity listed with the BBB, you only have to pay a (steep) registration fee.

But you can still spot a scam artist by being alert to the following dead giveaways that a charity is a scam.

Charities That Ask for Too Much Information Are Scams
 
Any charity that asks for too much information, including your date of birth, social security number or driver's license information is a scam.

Charities are not required by the IRS or state charity laws to collect this information and they do not need this information to process a donation or issue a tax receipt.

Unsolicited Mass Email Campaigns Are Dead Give Aways!
 
Charities are bound by CAN SPAM Laws - they are not allowed to contact you through purchased mass email lists, and they cannot use web robots to collect Email addresses from public Internet sources.
 
In fact, unless you have previously donated to a particular charity, I would be highly suspicious of any charity that contacted you via Email out of the blue.
 
Discard any Email that is sent to "Undisclosed Recipients." It is almost certainly a scam.

Charities Do Not Send Attachments in Solicitations Legitimate

Legitimate charities are smart about their solicitations. They know people are unlikely to open emails with attachments and they do not send them.

Do not open any charity Email with an attachment. And, before you click on any hyperlink in a solicitation Email be sure you are not clicking on a virus link.
 
If you are not sure how to do this, read How to Spot Fake Hyperlinks in Emails.
 
Fake Charity Website Dead Giveaways
 
Check out the charity's website before you visit it or click on Email hyperlinks. The fastest and easiest way is to check out the website's domain registration information.
 
To see when a website went live, visit www.Whois.sc and enter in the domain name. Whois.sc will tell you when the website went live, where its servers are located, etc. You do not have to create an account, and basic information about websites is free.
 
Scammers almost always purchase domain names for one year. They expect to get caught and shut down and discard the domain. Whois.sc allows you to look at when the domain registration expires.
  
If it will expire in less than one year, they might be a scam artist.

 How To Determine If your Charity is Legitimate

By
 
It is nice to give to others, and to help out those in need. When you choose a charity or cause to donate your money to, you need to make sure that you are giving a legitimate organization that will use your money for the purpose that you intended. It is your money that you are giving, so you should be sure that the charity or cause support your beliefs and your purposes when you give.
 
Here's How:
  1. First, you need to determine which charity or cause that you want to give to. For example if you want to donate a gift or money for children over the holidays you should have several different options available in your area to choose from. If you are choosing to help fight cancer or another cause you may different organizations to choose from as well.
  2. Second, you need to make sure that the organization you are giving to is legitimate. An easy way to do this is make sure it is a national organization with a large track record. You can check with your state to see if they are registered as a nonprofit. Many nonprofits also post where the contributions go on their websites. If you donate to a large organization such as the Red Cross you may be able to choose to support a specific need or cause.
  3. Third, you need to make sure that you are donating through a legitimate channel. For example, people have gone door to door collecting donations, and claiming that they belong to an organization when they do not. Usually you are best to contact your local chapter of the organization or the national organization and donate directly to them.
  4. Fourth, if you donate on the Internet be sure that you use a secure connection. You also need to make sure that the site is legitimate and not a site that was put up by someone other than the organization that you are trying to donate to. Be especially careful if you are linking to the site through an email that you received.
Tips:
  1. Giving money is a great way to help others. It can help you to feel empowered and to take control of your finances as you take time to donate on a regular basis. Many financial advisors recommend giving money on a regular basis.
  2. You should determine how much you can give and stick to your budget. You may choose to divide it between several different organizations or causes or you may choose to give to just one. The help that you give will be appreciated. You can also claim the donation as a tax deduction.
  3. Take advantage of the opportunities to donate through your work. Many companies will offer an incentive if you will contribute to United Way or another organization through your work. If you are comfortable giving to United Way it is easy to have the money automatically deducted from your paycheck each month.
  4. If you do not have the money to give, consider donating your time to a cause that you feel is important. Many people in their twenties spend time mentoring children and teenagers through Big Brothers and Big Sisters or other similar organizations. You can also give smaller donations of goods to your local food pantry to help when you have a little extra money. 
 
What You Need 
  • Money  
  • Time 

Avoid Donating to Irresponsible or Bogus Charities

 
There are many times in our lives when we decide to donate to charities that need our money to do their good work. We may feel moved to donate to a charity that does research in a certain health area we are interested in. When someone we loved or respected dies, their family may ask for donations in lieu of flowers. Tragedies often trigger creation of new charities, as when a young person dies a tragic death.
 
Sometimes we want to donate simply because we are asked to. And, of course, the end of the year, during the holiday season, we consider our gifting at the same time we plan for completing the tax year.
 
There are three important planning steps to determining the right charities to donate to:
  1. Develop your giving goals.
     
  2. Make sure a charity is bona fide; that is, that it exists to truly help the organization or individual it is meant to help.
     
  3. Research the strength of a charity's fiscal responsibility and its track record for using donated money to address the goals that are of interest to you.
Here is information to help you with these steps:
 
1. How can you choose which charities to donate to?
The best way is to set some giving goals - from the type of charity to the scope of its reach. For example, do you want to donate to help research treatment options for a certain disease? or perhaps you want to help pay for medical care for a child who has a rare disease? Here is how to determine what kinds of charities you want to support.
 
2. Confirm the authenticity of the charity.
There are tens of thousands of charities that ask you for money, but not all of them are real charities, meaning, some are only set up to take your money, and not to truly help your cause. This is particularly true when a tragedy has taken place, such as those scammers who claimed they represented families who lost a child at Sandy Hook, or which claimed they were assisting people who lost their homes after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.
 
If a charity is new to you, or if you have received some sort of solicitation by phone or email, do not simply assume that it is safe to donate - or even to link to the charity from an email link or a FaceBook page or other social media. You might be giving money to someone who doesn't deserve it, and even worse, if it's online, you may pick up a computer virus, too.
 
Therefore, it's important to confirm that you are donating to a bona fide charity, one that is authentic and will use your money well.
 
In some cases you can know whether a charity is "real" by confirming its IRS or CRA status. But don't ask the charity, and don't simply accept a statement on its website since we know that not all websites have credible information.
 
Instead check with either of these resources to confirm a charity's authenticity:
  • The Better Business Bureau will help you search for a rating on a specific charity. You won't be able to search for a group of charities with one focus, but you can find out how individual, even local, charities are rated or whether the BBB accredits them.
3. How well does the charity address your goals?
 
There are two important aspects of how well a charity is run that will be of interest to us as donors.
First, take a look at its fiscal responsibility. You want to know how well run a charity is; whether they waste their money, or have fulfilled their promises.
 
The second is to be sure they focus on the aspects you think are important. We all have different reasons for donating, whether we're donating to health-related charities or the local high school band. When it comes to health-related charities, it's important to learn enough about them to be sure they work toward the same goals as you have.
 
For example, both my grandmother and my mother died of Alzheimer's disease, so I know I probably have some genetic tendency toward developing Alzheimer's myself. My goal, then, is for my donations to go toward research to find a cure, or at least a highly effective treatment.
 
But in doing my research for the best Alzheimer's focused charitable organization to donate to, I learned that they don't all do what they say they plan to do. In one case, I realized how much money and effort was going toward paying other organizations to fund raise for them. Others say they are focused on research, but in some cases I learned that less than 20% of their donations actually go toward research! Would you think twice about donating to a charity that said one thing but showed a track record of something else? I certainly did.

Here are two websites that can help you check both fiscal responsibility and a charity's real spending vs the focus it claims:
  • Charity Navigator allows you to search by the name of an organization or by the disease or condition you hope to support. It allows for some very deep research into the financials, efficiency, cost of administration and more. It also provides a list of all 4-star rated health-related charities (4-stars are its highest ranking.)
     
  • GuideStar collects information about non-profit organizations and makes it available to the public through its website.  Included is a charity evaluator, among many other offerings.
Bottom line:

You have worked hard to earn the money you are ready to donate. Be sure that when you give your money away, you do so in a considered fashion, to groups or individuals that will be good shepherds of your donation.

Educating yourself is the best defence! Info from the IRD NZ

The following information is from IRD NZ the Link here: www.ird.govt.nz/.../our-compliance-focus-2010-11.pdf 
 
Non-profit groups
Non-profit groups, eg, society clubs, amateur sports clubs, charities and district societies, are exempt from income tax. There are 26,000 registered charities in New Zealand. Non-profit groups employ over 200,000 staff and volunteers—just over 9% of the working population.
Updated webpages for non-profit groups
In 2009–10 we developed a better understanding of the non-profit sector and how best to interact with them. Research showed us that the key to improving compliance for non-profit groups is in understanding their communication needs.
In March 2010 we launched an updated non-profit section on our website. We’ve tailored the refreshed site to meet non-profit groups’ needs.
 
The new non-profit section at www.ird.govt.nz/non-profit includes information about employing staff and volunteers, paying and claiming GST, recovering donations and grants, and keeping records and filing returns.
The feedback, so far, has been positive with non-profit groups telling us it gives them a better understanding of what they need to do to comply.
We based our refresh on changes non-profit groups asked for through research we did in August 2009. Overall, we found they prefer targeted information.
 
Misusing charities tax-exempt status
The non-profit sector provides important community services and products that make a difference for thousands of New Zealanders. To recognise this, registered charities don’t have to pay tax.
The majority of charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by a small group of individuals who try to exploit their tax-exempt status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.
We will address misuse of charities tax-exempt status by:
·         working with the Charities Commission to reduce opportunities for misusing tax-exempt status
·         identifying charities that create false receipts and invoices, organisations that claim to be charities but aren’t, and claims from claimants who are trustees, officers or who derive a monetary benefit from the charity
(in this case NARK.Org.NZ founder)
·         investigating and applying sanctions and penalties to anyone who chooses not to comply with their obligations and prosecuting them, where necessary.

Non-profit groups’ awareness of their obligations

Non-profit groups play an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the giving schemes. They need to provide authentic receipts for donations and ensure arrangements they put in place to encourage these donations don’t compromise customer privacy and Inland Revenue systems.
We work with non-profit groups that aren’t registered with the Charities Commission. We give advice about the registration process and make sure they understand their tax obligations and the potential consequences of not registering. The non-profit groups we’ve contacted have responded positively to our information about their obligations.
We will work with non-profit groups to ensure they:
·         understand charitable giving, eg, the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes
·         comply with the rules.

Tax incentives for charitable giving

New Zealand offers tax incentives to people who give money to registered charities. They can claim part of it back as a tax credit, either as a donation tax credit or through the payroll giving scheme.
But, in the past year, we’ve identified a number of issues that could affect the integrity of the tax system. They include:
·         ineligible or fraudulent donation tax credit claims being filed
·         people claiming a donation tax credit without meeting the application requirements
·         uncertainties about an organisation’s status, or interpretation of the donee organisation rules.
(No interpretation as to Nark.Org.NZ, being a Trust, Charity, Cause, Organization....)
We want individuals and businesses to understand the charitable giving process and follow the correct processes for making claims.

We will address tax issues around charitable giving by:

·         publicising the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes to donors and non-profit organisations, eg, contributing to an inter-agency education programme
·         educating tax agents and employers about the application requirements for charitable giving
·         educating individuals who file an Individual tax return (IR 3) income tax return about the steps we follow when processing their donation tax credit claims
·         raising awareness about how to access information on the donations tax credit requirements and the payroll giving scheme
·         improving our internal systems to quickly and accurately pick up incorrect and fraudulent claims, eg, income verification and tolerance checks to find input errors
·         continuing to investigate, apply sanctions and penalties, and prosecute, if necessary.
 
Misuse of charities
 
In recognition of the non-profit sector’s contribution to our communities, registered charities are allowed various exemptions and concessions. They also receive public and private donations, for which tax credits are claimed.
 
Most charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by people wanting to take advantage of their tax-exempt or concessionary status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.

In the past year, we have seen a growing range of abusive practices involving charities. These do not appear to involve generic schemes for tax avoidance. Instead, some taxpayers and their advisors are trying to use charities as a tax-saving device.

Increasingly, we are working in partnership with the Charities Commission (whose business functions have recently been moved to the Department of Internal Affairs) to identify charities and individuals whose activities warrant investigation. We are also developing appropriate compliance strategies.
 
A key resource for this work is the “open government data” that the Charities Commission now publishes on its website. Our information exchange with the Commission also helps us to identify existing and emerging trends in the misuse of charities.
 
We also liaise regularly with the ATO.

We are refining the legal and technical issues for cases involving charities, and have resourced specialist investigators to identify abusive practices and progress  cases swiftly.

We will investigate people who enter into tax avoidance schemes involving charities or who create false receipts and invoices. We will also focus on organisations that claim to be charities but are not, and on claims from trustees, officers or other people who receive payment from the charity.
 
Where appropriate, we will prosecute those who choose not to comply with their obligations.
 
 What you can do
 
• Make sure you understand your obligations. Avoid entering into any scheme that uses charities inappropriately. If you are unsure about your obligations, contact us for confirmation.
 
• If you or your client have misused a charity’s status,  you can contact us and make a voluntary disclosure, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: voluntary disclosure).
 
 • If you have information about the misuse of a charity, you can report it to us anonymously through our website, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: anonymous).  
 

Charitable organisations
Nga whakahaere aroha

 
Charitable organisations are organisations (whether incorporated or not) that carry out charitable activities or exist exclusively for charitable purposes. Since 1 July 2008 a charitable organisation needs to be registered by the Charities Commission to receive tax exemptions.

Income tax and charitable organisations

Charitable organisations are liable for income tax if they operate with no written rules, constitution or trust deed or they operate under a set of rules, a constitution or a trust deed that does not meet the requirements for income tax exemption or they use business income for charitable purposes outside New Zealand. Learn about rates of income tax, when to file returns and possible exemptions.

Registration of charities

The Charities Commission maintains a register of charitable entities that opened on 1 February 2007. Registration is voluntary, but if a charity wishes to be exempt from income tax and donors of gifts exempt from gift duty it will need to register.

Transitional guidelines for charities

These administrative guidelines are intended to provide clarity about the tax position for entities that have not completed the process of registering with the Charities Commission by 1 July 2008.
 
$1,000 income deduction
Some non-profit organisations may qualify for a $1,000 income deduction. This deduction makes the first $1,000 of income that organisation earns free from income tax.

If your organisation earns under $1,000

If your organisation's net income is below $1,000 per year, then the deduction effectively means you are exempt from income tax.
   
Therefore you won't be taxed on any income you earn, and don't need to file any income tax returns.
However, we recommend your organisation keeps records of any financial transactions, in case they are required for future reference. 

Note

An exemption or deduction of income tax doesn't automatically qualify your organisation for an exemption to all taxes. You may still be liable to pay other taxes, such as GST.

If your organisation earns over $1,000

If your organisation's net income is above $1,000 per year, you may be eligible for a deduction of up to $1,000. If you subtract this amount from your organisation's income, you reduce the amount of tax to pay.
   
To qualify for this deduction, your organisation will need to have written rules. An organisation without rules or a constitution won't qualify for the $1,000 income deduction.

Applying for the $1,000 income deduction

If your organisation doesn't qualify for an income tax exemption, you can apply for a deduction against your net income.
   
A non-profit organisation is allowed a deduction for the amount equal to the lesser of:
  • $1,000, or
  • the amount that would be the net income of the organisation.
To apply for a deduction, your organisation will need to follow the same processes as applying for the income exemption.

Applying for an income tax exemption

If you're a charitable organisation, go to the Charities Commission website to register as a charity.
   
If you're a non-profit body of any other kind, you may qualify for an income tax exemption.
Income tax exemptions aren't automatic. You'll need to apply to us in writing - go to "Contact us" for our address details.
   
Your organisation can send us a draft document of your exemption application for us to review. We can then suggest any changes before your organisation goes through the process and cost of having it submitted.
   
When you apply for the exemption, please include the following information about your organisation:
  • IRD number - if you don't have one, you'll need to apply. Please complete an IRD number application - non-individual (IR596)
  • a copy of its rules, constitution, trust deed or other founding documents - preferably in draft (before being finalised) form
  • a copy of its certificate of incorporation (if applicable)
  • a letter stating the type(s) of exemption being requested, eg sports club
  • details of how it has been or will be operating.
We'll then give you written confirmation of your organisation's tax exempt status for income tax.

Charitable purpose

Charitable purposes include:
  • the relief of poverty
  • the advancement of education
  • the advancement of religion
  • activities for the benefit of the community.
An organisation's purposes must fall within one of these categories to be charitable. Its activities or aims must be for public purposes and the benefit must be available to a large section of the community. In addition, it must not be carried on for the benefit or profit of any individual. If the beneficiaries are limited by blood ties the charitable purpose can still be met in some circumstances.

Many organisations consider themselves charitable because of the work they do or because they are registered under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. As a result, they may also think they are exempt from income tax. However, from 1 July 2008, an organisation will only be tax-exempt if it is a registered charity. Such an exemption does not apply to goods and services tax (GST) or PAYE. The organisation must still account for these.

Your organisation's income tax return

If your organisation has an annual turnover of less than $1,000, you don't need to file an income tax return. You'll simply need to keep sufficient records for your organisation.

If your income is above this threshold, or is expected to be, then you'll need to file an income tax return. The table below outlines what income return you'll need to file, depending on the type of your organisation.

If your organisation is a...then you'll need to file an...
registered and incorporated companyIR4 company income tax return
trust or estateIR6 income tax return for estates or trusts
club, society or associationIR9 income tax return for clubs or societies
 Go to Filing your income tax return at the end of the tax year


N.A.R.K Org.NZ threshold was well over $1,000
 

Sunday, 12 January 2014

N.A.R.K.Org.NZ the Obsolete Org!

 
From the Archives:.....http://web.archive.org/web/20120701000000*/http://www.nark.org.nz

 




Welcome To N.A.R.K.

"Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids"
 
"Our mission is to raise awareness of child abuse
in New Zealand and what you can do to help
prevent this in your community"
 
N.A.R.K. was founded by Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney after being branded a ‘nark’ for speaking to police about the death of Ngaruawahia baby Serenity Scott-Dinnington. Cherie turned this label around into the Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids and that is a label she wears proudly!
She started a facebook page, STOP Death by Abuse of OUR Children to raise awareness of New Zealand’s horrifying abuse record, put an end to the anti-nark culture and highlight what you can do in your community. Within a short time 11,000 people joined her campaign from mums and dads to politicians. Find out more..........
 

So how can we change this? By joining us in becoming a N.A.R.K.  

In New Zealand 10 children die every year by the hands of the people that are supposed to love them the most. Thousands more are confirmed to be suffering from abuse every year. It is our nation’s greatest shame. Find out how to support NARK click here.....

NARK ANGELS
Here you will find all the reasons why we do what we do, sadly this is a list of all the children who have died at the hands of those who were supposed to love them the most

...... they are our NARK angels
 

Event 3rd September 2011

Saturday, September 3 · 12:00pm - 3:00pm

Your Towns Local Memorial Statue or War Memorial or Wall

This memorial for our children who have died at the hands of someone who was supposed to be caring for them is simple, it does not cost BUT it will have huge impact.
I am asking you to spare 1 Toy/soft cuddly on September the 3rd and encourage everyone you can and know to do the same.

1 Toy to be placed at your towns local memorial statue or wall, in memory of our fallen heroes, the many children lost to child abuse.


Since our great soldiers passed there have been none other like them ever except for these Babies and I want a nation to accept awareness because for these children thats the very least we can be. AWARE.
Thank you and I really hope you can help.

 


 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney

Copyright © 2011 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney NARK.ORG.NZ. Site Design by Jim Boswell

 From the Way back Archives: http://web.archive.org/web/www.nark.org.nz

Dated: October 1, 2011








Nark Website

Dated: January 6, 2014


 Nark Website Now 


























 Expired Domains Website Nark Info: Link here: nark.org.nz

Since doing  our researching and finding much information about this Org/Trust/Charity/Cause....etc
 
and that of its founder Cherie (Sweeney, Cherie Robinson. Smith. Kurarangi, Cherie Evangeline Marie Kara. Kura. Karaka etc........
 
Then finding out about the Chairperson Ms Roberta Karangaroa and the  interesting media article and Court hearing, (of course not to forget our own experience of her throughout Nark.Org.Nz)
 
.......and the elusive undercover, non-Transparent, defender of a scam Organization and its founder.   Pete George (political dreamer).We remain adamant that the Nark.Org.nz was a Scam from its beginnings.

Update of Mr Pete George: Sep 20, 2013   Mayoral Profile Page

Makes sense now!
 
 
Cherie was quite adamant on making profit from the very beginning.  Sadly quite the opportunist, that woman. 
 
To the many good people who did the hard work, put in the long hours and organized  within Nark as (Cherie and Roberta where never there to help),  you should be commended congratulated on all your efforts and  on your truly wonderful "mana" in helping address the Child abuse issue in NZ.  You put all your hearts into it and you did wonderful work.
 
These good people (not knowing who Cherie really was/is), were greatly mistreated and threatened, continuously bullied, and accused of things (they never did) by the these two opportunist  women Cherie and Ms Roberta Karangaroa. 
 
Its quite deplorable and saddening how the good people were treated.
 
The unprofessional behaviour of both these woman is a disgrace, but then at the end of the day it was always about Profiteering and Media exposure with them. 
 
What ever became of the good people who left Nark.Org.Nz after the walkout in January 2012? (a large portion of the Nark.org.nz board and those who were members of the Org).
 
They have gone onto   establish their own Registered Children's Charities in NZ and have great support all around the country. They continue to this day, that is true Mana, a lovely group of people.
 
What happened after the walkout regarding Cherie, Roberta and Pete George and the Nark.Org.NZ fiasco?
 
Nothing.
 
No registration, no evidence of helping the Child Abuse issue, no evidence of anything  for that matter.

It seems when they were exposed as to their true agenda, (Profiting) they suddenly vanished.  For a founder who is on a "Mission" to raise awareness of child abuse
in New Zealand, there has been nothing forthcoming from either the Nark Org or that of its founder.......
Ms Cherie and Roberta were certainly on a mission, a mission of lies and scamming and ripping off the Public of NZ.


On a different note, Ms Cherie Sweeney sent us a lovely message via email, seems to still be using her Mobster Email address "maorified" to this day......

Dated: Aug 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM and Nov 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM






















So apparently many people are helping Cherie Sweeney with her business and her Nark Cause, would love to see that evidence Ms Sweeney, I doubt any would. And yet again she plays the "victim" role as so many times in the past. Sorry Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa YOU have been found out!

This is to keep all aware, that scams are quite prevalent in NZ.  Please ensure that when you give your money to a cause, make sure it is registered and get receipts. 

 Also do a background check of the Charity and founder if your not sure.  There are many people out there like Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa who are willing to take your hard earned cash and will never leave a paper trail.  These people are opportunists, they get everyone else to do the hard yards while they sit back and reap the benefits (in this case money and publicity) and its you who are directly paying for their "lavish" lifestyles. 

Make sure you know where your money is going too, and please be vigilant about these kind of scams around NZ.

Signing off

NZ