Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label NZ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NZ. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Roberta Karangaroa N.A.R.K Org.NZ Chairperson Scammer

An article from Stuff.co.nz regarding Ms Roberta Karangaroa's interesting  governance skills, regarding a Maori Land Trust she was meant to provide "governance training" for it's Trustees ...


Ms Roberta Karangaroa

Roberta Karangaroa, now known as Roberta Matiaha

 

Link is here: Roberta Karangaroa

Trustee wilfully overpaid her husband, judge finds
SIMON DAY

Last updated 05:00 05/08/2013

A Hawke's Bay woman accused of plundering thousands of dollars from a Maori Land Trust to pay for her wedding and to bankroll family and friends has resigned as a trustee.
 
The accusations against Sharon Edwards-Walker are revealed in a Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She was alleged to have made big overpayments from the trust, including more than $120,000 to her husband and his family. She also appointed a friend to provide "governance training" - the friend promptly withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use, the court said.
 
While Edwards-Walker and her family were allegedly receiving more than their entitlement in trust dividend payments, other members of the trust received no dividend at all.
 
Edwards-Walker was administrator of Te Raniera Huango Trust, which administers three blocks of Maori Freehold Land with 35 beneficial owners. She was responsible for paying out trust money.
 
Among the accusations of misappropriating money were $6500 to pay for her wedding in 2009. She also allegedly paid $699 on more than one occasion for medical insurance for her husband.
She also "wilfully overpaid" her husband and his siblings from trust dividends, according to the Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She claimed she had been bullied into the payments by her husband and others.
 
The judgment said Edwards-Walker approached a friend, Roberta Karangaroa, to provide governance training to the trustees. Karangaroa persuaded the trustees to add her as a signatory to the trust's accounts. 
 
The judgment said Karangaroa then withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use. After a complaint to police, $9500 was recovered.  
 
Judge Layne Harvey said that there could be "no justification" for  Edwards-Walker's conduct and in the absence of any alternative evidence, he concluded that "Edwards-Walker has abused her position as a trustee for personal gain, has placed herself in a conflict of interest position, and has made an unauthorised profit from her office".
 
On the basis of the trust's current level of dividend payments, it would take more than 20 years for the people who had been overpaid to restore those funds to the trust, according to the judgment.
 
Judge Harvey said that, in the absence of any "tenable defence", "there has been significant maladministration of the trust's finances, if not outright misappropriation", with the amount of money involved "as surprising as it is unacceptable".
 
The breaches of general trust law principles were sufficient to warrant Edwards-Walker's removal as a trustee. Judge Harvey said when he put this to Edwards-Walker, she chose to resign.          
The court directed the remaining trustees to obtain legal advice as to what recovery and enforcement actions may be appropriate should the allegations concerning the misappropriation of trust funds be proven. Ms Edwards-Walker was given two months to file a response to the allegations.
- © Fairfax NZ News
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 2011 Mark Mansfield made an application to the Maori Land Courts regarding non-transparency and missing monies with-in the Te Raniera Huango Trust. Link is from the justice.govt.nz website.

Note we have only included the relevant Paragraphs pertaining to Ms Roberta Karangaroa, as she is our subject of concern, regarding Nark.Org.Nz (apart from Ms Sweeney obviously). You can read the full complaint and also that of the judges ruling on the link below.

Full document here: Maori Land Courts, justice.govt.nz

Dated on the 28th March 2013





 







 
Continuation and Judgement: From justice.govt.nz

Hearing was on the 4 July 2013 in Hastings and Judge Ruling on the 5 July 2013 

[1] On 2 November 2011 Mark Mansfield filed proceedings per s238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 seeking financial information from the trustees of Te Raniera Huango Trust. He claimed that they had failed to hold general meetings, provide annual accounts and be accountable to the beneficial owners.

More seriously Mr Mansfield alleged that the trustees had "embezzled" trust funds and accordingly had to be brought before the Court to account for this conduct. I note that Mr Mansfield had made these claims of lack of financial accountability against the trustees in 2009 and the proceedings had been before the Court since then.

[19] Then there is the matter of the $12,000 taken from the trust’s account by Roberta Karangaroa. In my earlier judgment I directed the trustees to recover the outstanding $2,500 from Karangaroa following her repayment of $9,500. It now emerges that Ms Karangaroa claims she has returned that amount to Mrs Edwards-Walker directly, which the latter denies. 

[20] It will be remembered that Ms Karangaroa had been approached to provide "governance training" to the trustees at the request of Mrs Edwards-Walker. At the hearing yesterday Mrs Edwards-Walker confirmed that she had known Ms Karangaroa for many years and had asked her to provide "governance training" to the trustees.

At the previous hearing the trustees accepted they had been persuaded by Ms Karangaroa to add her, a non-owner and a non-beneficiary of the land, to become a signatory for the trust using the pretext that having siblings as trustees signing cheques was not best practice.

 Ironically, as mentioned, Ms Karangaroa then proceeded to withdraw $12,000 from the trust for her own personal use with $9,500 recovered from her following a complaint to the Police

[21] Ms Edwards-Walker subsequently claimed that the trust’s then bankers had paid the money out to Ms Karangaroa on only one signature and that on her return from overseas Mrs Edwards-Walker had gone to the bank to sign a withdrawal slip to approve the payment after the fact.

The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming. Indeed, Mrs Edwards-Walker claimed that whenever arrangements were made with Ms Karangaroa to hold a meeting she was invariably unavailable at the last minute.

[22] As I mentioned in my previous judgment the trustees are liable to repay this amount if it could not be recovered from Ms Karangaroa. As it was Mrs Edwards-Walker who signed the withdrawal or payment slip, and without the approval of the trustees, I find that she is responsible to repay this amount to the trust. That said, it may now be appropriate for the trustees to put the matter in the hands of a collection agency, in the absence of either repayment or a tenable defence from Ms Karangaroa.

Mr Mark Mansfield's compliant was legally justifiable.

[38] The present application was precipitated by allegations made against the trustees by Mark Mansfield. His original complaints concerned the lack of information available to beneficiaries, lack of meetings and lack of annual accounts. On the face of the evidence before the Court it would appear that many of Mr Mansfield’s concerns have been borne out and his complaints justified.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see throughout this whole matter, Ms Roberta Karangaroa and her "governance skills" along with dipping into another Trust's money, is of particular concern.  The similarities' a quite striking, as to Ms Roberta Karaangaoa's elusiveness in (being contactable/available) when $12,000 was taken from the trust’s account

From the post above:

"The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming."

Both Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa were very good at becoming unavailable through out our experiences with Nark.Org.Nz, on the Community Group Page.  When they eventually managed to grace page from time to time, they were always using excuses why they were away and that their time was limited. 
 
Also Cherie's continuous, "personal financial burdens" that were endless. Once questions of missing monies were brought to light, they totally avoided answers to our concerns.
 
Yes, Ms Roberta Karangaroa is well experienced in "spinning the truth".  The only thing is both Cherie and Roberta keep contradicting themselves.

Now if this was going in November 2011, we certainly have more knowledge now on the Ms Roberta' background and her love for Trusts, Money, and certainly trying to obtain it paper free, obligation free, question free, evidence free and most importantly..... tax free! This is certainly the case with Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney, included.   

 From the Charites.govt.nz Website.....

http://www.register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/Search

The Charities that Ms Roberta Karangaroa established. These ones are registered, however she is involved with many that aren't, ie Nark, Personal land trusts among others. We learnt along this journey that just because a Trust, Charties, Org etc aren't funded; certainly doesn't mean they don't get huge donations which are conveniently unaccounted for.  The many events that Ms Karangaroa and Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney organized, brought in huge amounts. 
Officer NameCharity NameRegistration
NumberStatusDate
Roberta KarangaroaNational Te Koru Puawai Charitable TrustCC31518Registered23/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaRiverslea Tu Tangata Incorporated Charity TrustCC31450Registered22/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaHawkes Bay Community Law Centre TrustCC37364Registered3/02/2009
 
Roberta Karangaroa was also a trustee for the Maatangireia Trust. Non existent currently.



.






























Roberta certainly has many years experience in "governance" for trusts etc.

 *Interesting how, the moment a complaint was made to the Police, Ms Roberta Karangaroa coughed up most of it. 


Ms Roberta and Cherie are experienced over many years in creating, hui's, meetings, media, events, getting funding (including Government funding) for their scam ideas
 
They have numerously used "heart-breaking" issues in NZ to persuade many to donate to their scams.   So, it's certainly of no surprise that Ms Roberta Karangaroa (currently of the Riverslea Trust, Hastings, among other trusts) would be quite persuasive in getting money from Trusts, she can certainly talk her way of a paper bag...... 

Another interesting  point is, when all this was going on....... Pete George of Your Nz, (Nark.Org.NZ, Board member) still supported them.  All their spinning, lies, abusiveness toward members and non-accountability of where monies were?









Pete George Party Your Dunedin Standing for Dunedin City Council - Central Ward Dunedin City Mayor (dreamer)


Pete George, certainly has a way with words.  He constantly bleats out "Transparency" but never follows through with that word...... Pete you really need to listen to yourself.  You've certainly never been "Transparent" by any means.

 Not a good political move Pete George.

So being that we are the NZ Public, we  decided to do our Civic duty, and pay Pete a visit on his, "Pete George for Dunedin Mayor" Facebook page he created September last year.......quite a catchy title, "Good luck with that Pete, go live that dream!"



 

And after 10 hours.... our message was removed,  and he's suddenly  laying low.  Pete is about as Transparent as a Kiwi made Gum Boot!  



 
 
Yep, this explains it then...
 
This is information for the New Zealand Public, by the New Zealand Public. We are here to keep NZ informed on this serious issue regarding the Scam Nark.Org,nz and also the two woman who have endeavoured with their "causes, pleas, hui's, events...etc". Purely profit driven and for so long and had gone unnoticed until now.

Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.Nz and Roberta Kararangi of the Riverslea Trust, are quite probably two of the best scammers in NZ.



Mrs Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.NZ

Saturday, 26 January 2013

N.A.R.K Org and Founder Cherie's reply to our concern's, First Media Article about this..

Nark founder accused of using charity funds

JONATHAN CARSON
Last updated 05:00 03/03/2012
Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney
UNDER SUSPICION: Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney




A woman who was branded a "nark" for speaking out against child abuse has been accused of using the charity she founded for personal gain.
But Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney denies the allegations, saying her "haters" have no evidence to support their claims.
Mrs Sweeney became a leader in the fight against child abuse after she spoke to police investigating the death of Ngaruawahia infant Serenity Jay Scott in April last year.
She founded Nark – Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids – and generated widespread media coverage.
However, Ngaruawahia residents have questioned her motives, and a Facebook group – Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) – accuses her of misusing Nark donations.
"When I started out with Nark I knew I was going to ruffle a few feathers but I didn't think I'd be attacked personally by people over false crap and accusations," Mrs Sweeney told the Times. "I'm not going to be bullied ... though."
On February 15, she made a plea to her supporters on Facebook for money. She wrote that she suffered severe seizures and epilepsy, had been made redundant, and her driver licence had been suspended. Her husband was off work due to illness.
She said she was $3500 in arrears on her mortgage and Westpac Bank had demanded she pay immediately. She claimed it was "impossible" for her to make the payment and asked for help "before me and my children lose our home".
"I know I have done a lot for the community via my campaign against child abuse," she posted. "But this means nothing to the bank, as it does not pay the bills."
She said that if every friend and supporter donated two dollars her family "would be saved", and she provided a bank account number for deposits.
A document provided by Mrs Sweeney showed $4229.51 was raised on the day she appealed for help, including a one-off donation of $3481. On February 16, she deposited $4181 into a Westpac bank account, which she said was to cover her mortgage, and the plea for money was personal and not associated with Nark.
But her critics are concerned she is benefiting from donations that should be going to the charity.
"I know for a fact that I'm not conning anyone," Mrs Sweeney said. "I've never had any of the Nark money into any personal account of my own."
According to a Nark financial statement, it had received $5370.26. But she said none had yet been spent.
A former supporter, who asked not to be named, said the public had a right to know where donations were being spent.Mrs Sweeney said she used Nark money to pay her personal internet connection, which was agreed to by Nark members. A financial statement showed at least $578 had been spent on her Telecom internet bill.
Nark is not an official charity, but Mrs Sweeney said she was trying to have it registered with the Charities Commission.
Commission spokeswoman Sandra Bennett could not comment on whether any complaints had been lodged about Nark or Mrs Sweeney.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6516915/Nark-founder-accused-of-using-charity-funds

Is NARK.Org.NZ a "Charitable Trust" or not? Two different disclaimers?

Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ The Money!)

An article in the Waikato Times,

 'Nark' crusader gains fans


A Ngaruawahia woman is fast becoming one of New Zealand's most popular people on Facebook.

CHRIS GARDNER
Dated: 22 June 2011

BRUCE MERCER/Waikato Times

SUCCESS: Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney has more than 10,000 friends on Facebook after going public on NZ's appalling record of child abuse.

She may not have made many friends in Ngaruawahia, but more than 10,000 people like Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney on Facebook.

Ms Sweeney has been called a nark for going public on New Zealand's appalling record of child abuse following the death of a neighbouring infant, Serenity Scott-Dinnington, earlier this year.

But she has turned the ugly label around by turning the initials into an acronym: Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids (Nark).

The group's Facebook page "STOP Death by Abuse of our Children" is liked by 10,241 people, among them politicians including former Maori Party MP Hone Harawira.

"This page will centre on family violence, social issues, child safety, alcohol and drugs and developing support networks in our communities to STOP the Deaths by Abuse of "OUR" Children," Ms Sweeney wrote on the page in a May 13 post.

She was humbled by the amount of support she has had.

The trust which is starting with a $345 in the coffers from public donations will advocate for the nation's children.

Ms Sweeney is establishing a Rest In Peace tab on the site, which will feature pictures of victims alongside inquest reports.

"I tried to get coroners' reports, but they told me it would be $50 per application. With 150 names that's $7500 I don't have."

While it's early days the trust will hold a meeting in Ngaruawahia later this month to draw up its mandate supporters on Facebook are brimming with ideas, including a national march to raise awareness.

"People have designed logos, a few of the MPs have decided to get in on it." Ms Sweeney said.

"I can get people together (through Facebook) who are having issues.

"There's been heaps and heaps of messages on the page. It's a very big eye-opener for me.

"A lot of it is just being able to speak up. We are setting up this Nark Trust here, in Ngaruawahia, and we have to set up a bank account."

The Nark Trust will meet at the Ngaruawahia Community House on June 27.

NARK Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/pages/STOP-Death-by-Abuse-of-our-Children/166417770086797


What happened to the Trust and money, in that article? People where donating as early as June, but NO Transparency? 
http://www.nark.org.nz/Community_Facebook_Page.html

N.A.R.K Facebook Community Page


DISCLAIMER

NARK will not take responsibility when you are in discussion of self harm and or harm to others OR if discussion takes place that admin feel is a danger to yourself and or others we have a moral and legal responsibility to info the NZ Police. 

The views of this page are not necessarily representative of the views of NARK Working Party / Interim Board.

 


Copyright © 2011 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney NARK.ORG.NZ. Site Design by Jim Boswell

N.A.R.K Facebook STOP Death of OUR Children


DISCLAIMER

NARK will not take responsibility when you are in discussion of self harm and or harm to others OR if discussion takes place that admin feel is a danger to yourself and or others we have a moral and legal responsibility to info the NZ Police. 

The views of this page are not necessarily representative of the views of NARK as a
.charitable Trust
Copyright © 2011 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney NARK.ORG.NZ. Site Design by Jim Boswell

Full Page Disclaimers:



N.A.R.K Facebook STOP Death of OUR Children

 Welcome to the NARK STOP Death of OUR Children
Facebook Page STOP Death by Abuse of OUR Children

The purpose of this group is to keep abreast of current affairs re Child abuse media release for the purpose of discussion. A place to share valuable information of resources and NARK updates for the benefit of community consultation being transparent.  This is a place to share concerns and find support amongst members who wish to share or discuss, and/or help find solutions to the problem.

STOP Facebook Page Rules & Code of Conduct
  
1,

The NARK STOP Death of OUR Children is a place to foster support and discuss   related media News Items which arise in relation to the STOP Death by Child Abuse growing awareness.

2, 

The NARK STOP Death of OUR Children is also a place to ask for help. You can   either do this on a thread topic, or should you wish to discuss a matter of Child safety with the NARK team, please feed free to Email one of us, for the NARK Interim Trust Board Email list.

3, 

To be respectful of everyone views.  Not everyone holds the same       views on each thread topic posted, this is to be respected. Please keep comments on topic pertaining to the thread.   If can not agree, please agree to disagree with our commentators.

4,

There is to be NO profanity, or derogatory comments toward any        other members.

5, 

Spamming will not be acceptable.  Please do not use this page to push your own agenda, organizations or indifferent views of any     organization.

6,       

The Administrators of this page have the right to remove posts that are offensive or extreme, spam will also be removed.
   There are Three     Administrators for this page of who will discuss and decide what is to be removed or deemed inappropriate for this group.  No discussion   will be entered after the removal of.

7,       

Conflicts of interest must be declared at all times when posting   comments in NARK STOP page.  Please be sure to state if your    opinion is of a professional one or a personal if required.

8,   

NARK will not take ownership of views and or professional / personal opinions that are defamatory to any organization.

9, 

Members seeking advice in the NARK 
STOP Death of OUR Childrenpage  are entitled to confidentiality and any communications must be kept between the members of this closed group. Anyone wanting to discuss  this problem outside of this group must first seek the approval of the person who posted the problem.

10,

Administrators have the Right to excuse member if they break the        rules, or cause disrespect to other members.  A warning will be issued in this instance.

11,

Administrators and NARK Interim Trust Members of HQ can be         identified by the NARK badge attached to their profile pictures.


12,

Please be aware it is now Law to pass on any knowledge you have of   Child Abuse, or could be liable for prosecution.

13,

We encourage you to share any useful resources relating to this topic, ie Web-pages, support groups etc.

14,

NARK was started on Principle before Personality, therefore any         personal attack or slanderous comments towards NARK Executive or  Board Members will result in your being immediately removed from this page.

DISCLAIMER

NARK will not take responsibility when you are in discussion of self harm and or harm to others OR if discussion takes place that admin feel is a danger to yourself and or others we have a moral and legal responsibility to info the NZ Police. 

The views of this page are not necessarily representative of the views of NARK as a charitable Trust.

 




"Haters" says Cherie Sweeney, because the Public are concerned, and wanting answers?

Reflecting back on the first article, we were quite surprised at the term "haters" being used in such a derogatory term for the Public.


Lets break this article down, so we can get a clear picture:


......."But Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney denies the allegations, saying her "haters" have no evidence to support their claims." 


We responded on our page:

Haters response 3/3/2012 on Sunday, 4 March 2012 at 11:49 ·

Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!)

In response of Cherie calling us "Haters" I would like to rectify that. We are wanting answers (and proof), we have the right to know where our money has gone too. Labeling us "Haters" (people who have donated greatly to NARK) for wanting answers by Cherie, is very unprofessional, and an avoidance of the issue.  Like ·  · Share · 21 hours ago ·    


Please note: peoples names below have been removed, regarding their responses for protection.
    •  How can you be labelled a hater for asking questions? Surely asking questions shows you care rather than just mouthing off without knowing the facts. Answers to the questions would stop all of this as Cherie, Roberta and team, supposedly bright folk should know.
      18 hours ago · Unlike ·  2

    • sadly you are always vilified for speaking out and asking for the truth..
      18 hours ago · Unlike ·  1

  •  As Cherie keeps telling the media with regards herself and now she is doing the same to folk who have been speaking due their concerns re NARK.......double standards unfortunately.
16 hours ago · Unlike ·  2  

________________________________________________________________________
From the Article:

..."When I started out with Nark I knew I was going to ruffle a few feathers but I didn't think I'd be attacked personally by people over false crap and accusations," Mrs Sweeney told the Times. "I'm not going to be bullied ... though.".... Ms Sweeney.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our only concerns were why, we never were given evidence or answers, regarding the missing monies from Nark.Org. Also why were people being removed for asking simple questions, then being accused of being abusive and we were all threatened with defamation if we spoke about this to media. 


As stated before, people were being swiftly removed, some Nark team members were not online that night, but they too were removed. We never heard anything from Nark or Cherie until the Media got wind of it and this is her first public response to NZ regarding our concerns.

---------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Article!

.......On February 15, she made a plea to her supporters on Facebook for money. She wrote that she suffered severe seizures and epilepsy, had been made redundant, and her driver licence had been suspended. Her husband was off work due to illness....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are some discrepancies here?

February the 15th, was the "Mortgage Event" correct.  She may certainly have seizures, epilepsy etc.  What struck us, was that she said her husband, was off work due to illness..... 

This is also a post from Mr Sweeney aka Wave Kuri Toa, from our Facebook page:

(He is also speaking with his sister here, which Ms Sweeney had accused of her of starting the Public Facebook Page.)


Wavee Kuri Toa

Ripping off the community blah come clean Carolyn Sweeney Carolyn wilson carolyn edwards Ngahoia Singh. How many other alias names are you using to hide your past. From past criminal offences and bad credit you lied to get a job at Winz in Hamilton. 

Your starting all of this hate because we put a cyfs notice on your Daughter Joan Ngahoia wilson aka jada jones where did she learn to use alias names carolyn aka Witchy. For taking her kids Shop lifting at Te awa an leaving them in the car We didn't like that so we notifIed cyfs Nek Minit your digging up all this bullshit on us. 

OK I committed a serious offence back in 1987 nothing since can't we're be allowed to progress. Don't you think people can heal over time were only trying to stop our kids being killed your two mokos are in thaty red flag area joanies a transient solo mum that steals her baby formula an spend her benefit on alcohol and pot. How can you help her in aussie do you know what going on here. Probably all your doing is tieing up cherie and diverting attention away from the real issues. Your mokos you talk about us ripping off the community I initially funded this whole campaign from my credit cards an kiwi saver now I'm sick an can't work but rest assured we will continue to speak up for our tamariki no matter what we don't need putea because of your evil hating we believe the goodness of what we are doing will prevail we have to souls of all these Murdered kids behind us.

 Say what you want. It won't change a thing. We will continue to do what we have too. Money or no money it will fall from the heavens for us.
Like ·  · 11 minutes ago ·  
    • Witchy Sweeney wavee my integrity is at question here its yours...yes I have been married twice...unfortunately with that, you have to change your name, Singh as you know is our mums name, which I perfer...when I got my job with the govt in nz I actually had to speak about you in my interview, so that nothing crawled from under the mat while I worked...my life is fine...its yours thats a joke...anyone want to ask me questions....feel free...my life is an open book....now yours wavee...what a joke....
      6 minutes ago · Unlike ·  2


    • Witchy Sweeney by the way are you still selling P to our kids?
      6 minutes ago · Like


    • False Peoplesuck May I ask, did witchy ( your sister yes?) start an organisation to help raise abuse awareness and use her position to raise money to allegedly save your house ? You are airy family laundry when all anyone wants is to know where donations went.
      4 minutes ago · Like ·  1

    • Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) Why was money from Nark, diverted into you and Ms Sweeneys joint acct?
      3 minutes ago · Like ·  1


    • Witchy Sweeney oh and my name was CAROLYNE please spell it correctly if you are wanting to make something of it....
      2 minutes ago · Unlike ·  1

    • Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!) You are delusional Mr Sweeney, NZ will not let you use our most vulnerable as your financial incentive.
      2 minutes ago · Like
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He also said he was ill, and he had to be cleared by a doctor to work. These pictures were taken a few days later, after the "Plea" at the Tainui Games 17th-19th February 2012. Here is Mr Sweeney with Vic Tamati.

2012 Waikato-Tainui Games






















    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From the Article!

    ......She said she was $3500 in arrears on her mortgage and Westpac Bank had demanded she pay immediately. She claimed it was "impossible" for her to make the payment and asked for help "before me and my children lose our home".

    "I know I have done a lot for the community via my campaign against child abuse," she posted. "But this means nothing to the bank, as it does not pay the bills."
    She said that if every friend and supporter donated two dollars her family "would be saved", and she provided a bank account number for deposits.

    A document provided by Mrs Sweeney showed $4229.51 was raised on the day she appealed for help, including a one-off donation of $3481. On February 16, she deposited $4181 into a Westpac bank account, which she said was to cover her mortgage, and the plea for money was personal and not associated with Nark.........
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This is correct, as we see on the "Mortgage Plea" Post link: 

    http://nzuncovered.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/mortgage-plea-15th-february-2012.html
    ...I know I have done a lot for the community via my campaign against Child Abuse but this means nothing to the Bank , as it does not pay the bills....
    The highlighted section above shows that, she did in fact use her public position to help her with her "Mortgage Plea" that night. When questions were being asked as to, if there could be some kind of money transaction transparency, as to the money actually going toward the Mortgage, Ms Sweeney said she will post verification. 

     The only thing she gave for Transparency was a "manipulated"  transaction sheet of monies, going into her personal account but nothing to prove it actually went on the mortgage.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From the Article!
    ...... But her critics are concerned she is benefiting from donations that should be going to the charity.
    "I know for a fact that I'm not conning anyone," Mrs Sweeney said. "I've never had any of the Nark money into any personal account of my own."......




    NARK donations going to the Sweeney Joint account on 13th of January 2012. (More posts to come on that topic) ;)

    Update on this link here: Updated
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    According to a Nark financial statement, it had received $5370.26. But she said none had yet been spent.
    Mrs Sweeney said she used Nark money to pay her personal internet connection, which was agreed to by Nark members. A financial statement showed at least $578 had been spent on her Telecom internet bill....

    .We have received no evidence of these figures, only what she is saying. We are still waiting for proof on these figures, my next post will show what "evidence" they did decide to come up with. Prepare to be shocked.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From the Article:
    ....Nark is not an official charity, but Mrs Sweeney said she was trying to have it registered with the Charities Commission.
    Commission spokeswoman Sandra Bennett could not comment on whether any complaints had been lodged about Nark or Mrs Sweeney.....
    But Ms Cherie Sweeney happily advertised that is was under the "Charity Trust" Identity, to make her Org sound more legit.

    As we see on this link ^^^^ its certainly false advertising, for people who are not aware of this.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fact: N.A.R.K isn't under any representation, not a Charity, Charity Trust or under any Identity.