Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label governance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label governance. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 July 2015

Star Now and Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark: Biography


Waikato, New Zealand

Actor, Model, Film & Stage Crew

www.tv3.co.nz/Shows/Drama/OutrageousFortune/Gallery/tabid/837/Default.aspx#

I dream of playing that Dream part that makes you the actor you always knew you were inside, the Lady of the fire people that can speak Dragon or the Elf who knows the secret of the Mountain. I am her and she is me. I am who you think I am and more. Acting Experience wise Ive done a lot of work and thats listed here but it never tells you what I can do.

 
I have also worked on TV as a Presenter and on many NZ Short Films as both a Lead and Featured extra Actress. I am Passionate about acting and Modeling and believe I have a real future in this career. less
16 Castings

All
Modeling
Acting
Crew
Physical Details
Photos
Experience















Physical Details
Height:
170 cm / 5ft 7in

Hips:

86 cm / 34in

Weight:

51 kg / 112 lbs

Shoe size:

5.0 UK /6.5 US / 38.0 Euro


Ethnicity:

Other


Hair colour:

Brown

Skin colour:

Olive

Hair length:

Medium

Eye colour:

Grey

Hair type:

Straight

Chest:

88 cm / 35 in


Dress Size:

6 - 8

Waist:

63 cm / 25in


Experience
2009


Waikato University and TWOR : Masters in Management, Hamilton, NZ
2008
Performing Arts School : Diploma Performing Arts / Summer School, Hastings, NZ
2007
Eastern Institute Of Technology : IT and Computing, Napier, NZ
2002
Karamea Studios : Catwalk & Stage Presence, Wellington, NZ
Takitimu Performing Arts School : Performing Arts (Voice Dance Drama) (Tama Huata), Hawkes Bay, NZ

Acting
Acting experience:

Previous paid speaking roles

Languages

English
Maori
Samoan
Sign Language

Accents
USA California
USA New York
USA Southern
French
Greek
Italian
Latin American
Maori
Mexican
Pacific Islander
Spanish


Acting is a venture into another world that I get to be a part of.

I am lucky to have completed work on both two hot new TV shows including Brown Brothaz and Outrageous Fortune Series 6 both of which are two of New Zealand's Prime Time TV series on TV3. I have had some very interesting Characters and I take on board any character as I love the way I get to develop as an actor with them.


I have had various Featured extra pieces in TVCs and short dramas but have also been the lead actress in several NZ Short Films.
 

I have also presented 2 Youth TV Programmes and 1 Music Show for Television.


I Speak English articulately and can also speak Maori and a little Samoan, I pick up languages fast which is helpful if the script is in a foreign language or even a fictional language.
 

Modeling


Website: www.tv3.co.nz/Shows/Drama/OutrageousFortune/Gallery/tabid/837/Default.aspx#


Modeling experience:

Part-time model - paid commercial work


I have been modelling since 10 & feel I am very experienced in both Promotions and Product Branding as well.


I have modeled on several fashion shows, including NZ Fashion Week and Style Pasifika. I have also been a top ranked Auto X girl.


I have entered and placed well at several Bikini Competitions and raised thousands for my Charity of choice Surf Lifesavers New Zealand.



I have modeled nude for artistic photographic purposes and believe that it takes a strong and confident individual to achieve well in this type of modeling all of which I am.



I have huge experience not just in Acting and Modeling but also in Promotions too

TV & Reality
I have not appeared on any game shows, reality TV shows or anything of the sort, This would be a completely new experience for me.

Film & Stage Crew


PRESENTER / DOCO DIRECTOR / PRODUCTION COORDINATOR

I Presented 2 Shows for television both of which were Youth Targeted including Taiohi, a daily magazine style format show, which was both informative and covered Polynesian youth issues, and Vibe, a weekend music show . The most valuable experience included Studio links, Directing Talent and interviewing both National and International Celebrities.

Duties Included:

- Storyboarding

- Cuts only editing.

- Post Production

More Recently I wrote and pieced together the storyline and synopsis for a documentary on Young Women and Violent Crime Girl Gangs. The experience learnt from this was invaluable to my capabilities in both Pre and Post Production. I also gained firsthand knowledge about interviewing people about more sensitive issues.

- Synopsis Development

- Advanced Interviews for Research

- Processing Video Footage.

- Legal Obligations for Documentaries

Magazine


PUBLICIST
I believe that as the industry develops so should our skills in NZ I love working with our Native Roots I.e. MIKA is someone I dearly loved working for because creating publicity for LIVE SHOWS has always been an exciting and “Full ON” experience, something MIKA is internationally renowned for. This show was the first of its kind ever in New Zealand and so I found the Promotional work behind it both invigorating and challenging.

- Create National and International Media and Public interest in MIKA the Show.

- Co-ordinate Media at live shows / Press Conferences.

As the primary publicist and Promotions Coordinator, I was solely responsible for the media liaison for MA-V-ELLE. I was also instrumental in the construction of their first National Tour of New Zealand, and created the networks and venues for the group to perform at. I worked both from home and within FESTIVAL RECORDS, the distributor company, to initiate Media and Public interest in the Tour and Their Album Release.

- Construct and network MA-V-ELLE National Tour

- Organise and Co-Ordinate Media at LIVE SHOWS

- Compile GST / PAYE returns.

- Processing Invoices. Maintaining Vehicle Log Books

Latest comments





Comments

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Educating yourself is the best defence! Info from the IRD NZ

The following information is from IRD NZ the Link here: www.ird.govt.nz/.../our-compliance-focus-2010-11.pdf 
 
Non-profit groups
Non-profit groups, eg, society clubs, amateur sports clubs, charities and district societies, are exempt from income tax. There are 26,000 registered charities in New Zealand. Non-profit groups employ over 200,000 staff and volunteers—just over 9% of the working population.
Updated webpages for non-profit groups
In 2009–10 we developed a better understanding of the non-profit sector and how best to interact with them. Research showed us that the key to improving compliance for non-profit groups is in understanding their communication needs.
In March 2010 we launched an updated non-profit section on our website. We’ve tailored the refreshed site to meet non-profit groups’ needs.
 
The new non-profit section at www.ird.govt.nz/non-profit includes information about employing staff and volunteers, paying and claiming GST, recovering donations and grants, and keeping records and filing returns.
The feedback, so far, has been positive with non-profit groups telling us it gives them a better understanding of what they need to do to comply.
We based our refresh on changes non-profit groups asked for through research we did in August 2009. Overall, we found they prefer targeted information.
 
Misusing charities tax-exempt status
The non-profit sector provides important community services and products that make a difference for thousands of New Zealanders. To recognise this, registered charities don’t have to pay tax.
The majority of charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by a small group of individuals who try to exploit their tax-exempt status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.
We will address misuse of charities tax-exempt status by:
·         working with the Charities Commission to reduce opportunities for misusing tax-exempt status
·         identifying charities that create false receipts and invoices, organisations that claim to be charities but aren’t, and claims from claimants who are trustees, officers or who derive a monetary benefit from the charity
(in this case NARK.Org.NZ founder)
·         investigating and applying sanctions and penalties to anyone who chooses not to comply with their obligations and prosecuting them, where necessary.

Non-profit groups’ awareness of their obligations

Non-profit groups play an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the giving schemes. They need to provide authentic receipts for donations and ensure arrangements they put in place to encourage these donations don’t compromise customer privacy and Inland Revenue systems.
We work with non-profit groups that aren’t registered with the Charities Commission. We give advice about the registration process and make sure they understand their tax obligations and the potential consequences of not registering. The non-profit groups we’ve contacted have responded positively to our information about their obligations.
We will work with non-profit groups to ensure they:
·         understand charitable giving, eg, the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes
·         comply with the rules.

Tax incentives for charitable giving

New Zealand offers tax incentives to people who give money to registered charities. They can claim part of it back as a tax credit, either as a donation tax credit or through the payroll giving scheme.
But, in the past year, we’ve identified a number of issues that could affect the integrity of the tax system. They include:
·         ineligible or fraudulent donation tax credit claims being filed
·         people claiming a donation tax credit without meeting the application requirements
·         uncertainties about an organisation’s status, or interpretation of the donee organisation rules.
(No interpretation as to Nark.Org.NZ, being a Trust, Charity, Cause, Organization....)
We want individuals and businesses to understand the charitable giving process and follow the correct processes for making claims.

We will address tax issues around charitable giving by:

·         publicising the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes to donors and non-profit organisations, eg, contributing to an inter-agency education programme
·         educating tax agents and employers about the application requirements for charitable giving
·         educating individuals who file an Individual tax return (IR 3) income tax return about the steps we follow when processing their donation tax credit claims
·         raising awareness about how to access information on the donations tax credit requirements and the payroll giving scheme
·         improving our internal systems to quickly and accurately pick up incorrect and fraudulent claims, eg, income verification and tolerance checks to find input errors
·         continuing to investigate, apply sanctions and penalties, and prosecute, if necessary.
 
Misuse of charities
 
In recognition of the non-profit sector’s contribution to our communities, registered charities are allowed various exemptions and concessions. They also receive public and private donations, for which tax credits are claimed.
 
Most charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by people wanting to take advantage of their tax-exempt or concessionary status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.

In the past year, we have seen a growing range of abusive practices involving charities. These do not appear to involve generic schemes for tax avoidance. Instead, some taxpayers and their advisors are trying to use charities as a tax-saving device.

Increasingly, we are working in partnership with the Charities Commission (whose business functions have recently been moved to the Department of Internal Affairs) to identify charities and individuals whose activities warrant investigation. We are also developing appropriate compliance strategies.
 
A key resource for this work is the “open government data” that the Charities Commission now publishes on its website. Our information exchange with the Commission also helps us to identify existing and emerging trends in the misuse of charities.
 
We also liaise regularly with the ATO.

We are refining the legal and technical issues for cases involving charities, and have resourced specialist investigators to identify abusive practices and progress  cases swiftly.

We will investigate people who enter into tax avoidance schemes involving charities or who create false receipts and invoices. We will also focus on organisations that claim to be charities but are not, and on claims from trustees, officers or other people who receive payment from the charity.
 
Where appropriate, we will prosecute those who choose not to comply with their obligations.
 
 What you can do
 
• Make sure you understand your obligations. Avoid entering into any scheme that uses charities inappropriately. If you are unsure about your obligations, contact us for confirmation.
 
• If you or your client have misused a charity’s status,  you can contact us and make a voluntary disclosure, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: voluntary disclosure).
 
 • If you have information about the misuse of a charity, you can report it to us anonymously through our website, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: anonymous).  
 

Charitable organisations
Nga whakahaere aroha

 
Charitable organisations are organisations (whether incorporated or not) that carry out charitable activities or exist exclusively for charitable purposes. Since 1 July 2008 a charitable organisation needs to be registered by the Charities Commission to receive tax exemptions.

Income tax and charitable organisations

Charitable organisations are liable for income tax if they operate with no written rules, constitution or trust deed or they operate under a set of rules, a constitution or a trust deed that does not meet the requirements for income tax exemption or they use business income for charitable purposes outside New Zealand. Learn about rates of income tax, when to file returns and possible exemptions.

Registration of charities

The Charities Commission maintains a register of charitable entities that opened on 1 February 2007. Registration is voluntary, but if a charity wishes to be exempt from income tax and donors of gifts exempt from gift duty it will need to register.

Transitional guidelines for charities

These administrative guidelines are intended to provide clarity about the tax position for entities that have not completed the process of registering with the Charities Commission by 1 July 2008.
 
$1,000 income deduction
Some non-profit organisations may qualify for a $1,000 income deduction. This deduction makes the first $1,000 of income that organisation earns free from income tax.

If your organisation earns under $1,000

If your organisation's net income is below $1,000 per year, then the deduction effectively means you are exempt from income tax.
   
Therefore you won't be taxed on any income you earn, and don't need to file any income tax returns.
However, we recommend your organisation keeps records of any financial transactions, in case they are required for future reference. 

Note

An exemption or deduction of income tax doesn't automatically qualify your organisation for an exemption to all taxes. You may still be liable to pay other taxes, such as GST.

If your organisation earns over $1,000

If your organisation's net income is above $1,000 per year, you may be eligible for a deduction of up to $1,000. If you subtract this amount from your organisation's income, you reduce the amount of tax to pay.
   
To qualify for this deduction, your organisation will need to have written rules. An organisation without rules or a constitution won't qualify for the $1,000 income deduction.

Applying for the $1,000 income deduction

If your organisation doesn't qualify for an income tax exemption, you can apply for a deduction against your net income.
   
A non-profit organisation is allowed a deduction for the amount equal to the lesser of:
  • $1,000, or
  • the amount that would be the net income of the organisation.
To apply for a deduction, your organisation will need to follow the same processes as applying for the income exemption.

Applying for an income tax exemption

If you're a charitable organisation, go to the Charities Commission website to register as a charity.
   
If you're a non-profit body of any other kind, you may qualify for an income tax exemption.
Income tax exemptions aren't automatic. You'll need to apply to us in writing - go to "Contact us" for our address details.
   
Your organisation can send us a draft document of your exemption application for us to review. We can then suggest any changes before your organisation goes through the process and cost of having it submitted.
   
When you apply for the exemption, please include the following information about your organisation:
  • IRD number - if you don't have one, you'll need to apply. Please complete an IRD number application - non-individual (IR596)
  • a copy of its rules, constitution, trust deed or other founding documents - preferably in draft (before being finalised) form
  • a copy of its certificate of incorporation (if applicable)
  • a letter stating the type(s) of exemption being requested, eg sports club
  • details of how it has been or will be operating.
We'll then give you written confirmation of your organisation's tax exempt status for income tax.

Charitable purpose

Charitable purposes include:
  • the relief of poverty
  • the advancement of education
  • the advancement of religion
  • activities for the benefit of the community.
An organisation's purposes must fall within one of these categories to be charitable. Its activities or aims must be for public purposes and the benefit must be available to a large section of the community. In addition, it must not be carried on for the benefit or profit of any individual. If the beneficiaries are limited by blood ties the charitable purpose can still be met in some circumstances.

Many organisations consider themselves charitable because of the work they do or because they are registered under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. As a result, they may also think they are exempt from income tax. However, from 1 July 2008, an organisation will only be tax-exempt if it is a registered charity. Such an exemption does not apply to goods and services tax (GST) or PAYE. The organisation must still account for these.

Your organisation's income tax return

If your organisation has an annual turnover of less than $1,000, you don't need to file an income tax return. You'll simply need to keep sufficient records for your organisation.

If your income is above this threshold, or is expected to be, then you'll need to file an income tax return. The table below outlines what income return you'll need to file, depending on the type of your organisation.

If your organisation is a...then you'll need to file an...
registered and incorporated companyIR4 company income tax return
trust or estateIR6 income tax return for estates or trusts
club, society or associationIR9 income tax return for clubs or societies
 Go to Filing your income tax return at the end of the tax year


N.A.R.K Org.NZ threshold was well over $1,000
 

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Roberta Karangaroa N.A.R.K Org.NZ Chairperson Scammer

An article from Stuff.co.nz regarding Ms Roberta Karangaroa's interesting  governance skills, regarding a Maori Land Trust she was meant to provide "governance training" for it's Trustees ...


Ms Roberta Karangaroa

Roberta Karangaroa, now known as Roberta Matiaha

 

Link is here: Roberta Karangaroa

Trustee wilfully overpaid her husband, judge finds
SIMON DAY

Last updated 05:00 05/08/2013

A Hawke's Bay woman accused of plundering thousands of dollars from a Maori Land Trust to pay for her wedding and to bankroll family and friends has resigned as a trustee.
 
The accusations against Sharon Edwards-Walker are revealed in a Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She was alleged to have made big overpayments from the trust, including more than $120,000 to her husband and his family. She also appointed a friend to provide "governance training" - the friend promptly withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use, the court said.
 
While Edwards-Walker and her family were allegedly receiving more than their entitlement in trust dividend payments, other members of the trust received no dividend at all.
 
Edwards-Walker was administrator of Te Raniera Huango Trust, which administers three blocks of Maori Freehold Land with 35 beneficial owners. She was responsible for paying out trust money.
 
Among the accusations of misappropriating money were $6500 to pay for her wedding in 2009. She also allegedly paid $699 on more than one occasion for medical insurance for her husband.
She also "wilfully overpaid" her husband and his siblings from trust dividends, according to the Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She claimed she had been bullied into the payments by her husband and others.
 
The judgment said Edwards-Walker approached a friend, Roberta Karangaroa, to provide governance training to the trustees. Karangaroa persuaded the trustees to add her as a signatory to the trust's accounts. 
 
The judgment said Karangaroa then withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use. After a complaint to police, $9500 was recovered.  
 
Judge Layne Harvey said that there could be "no justification" for  Edwards-Walker's conduct and in the absence of any alternative evidence, he concluded that "Edwards-Walker has abused her position as a trustee for personal gain, has placed herself in a conflict of interest position, and has made an unauthorised profit from her office".
 
On the basis of the trust's current level of dividend payments, it would take more than 20 years for the people who had been overpaid to restore those funds to the trust, according to the judgment.
 
Judge Harvey said that, in the absence of any "tenable defence", "there has been significant maladministration of the trust's finances, if not outright misappropriation", with the amount of money involved "as surprising as it is unacceptable".
 
The breaches of general trust law principles were sufficient to warrant Edwards-Walker's removal as a trustee. Judge Harvey said when he put this to Edwards-Walker, she chose to resign.          
The court directed the remaining trustees to obtain legal advice as to what recovery and enforcement actions may be appropriate should the allegations concerning the misappropriation of trust funds be proven. Ms Edwards-Walker was given two months to file a response to the allegations.
- © Fairfax NZ News
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 2011 Mark Mansfield made an application to the Maori Land Courts regarding non-transparency and missing monies with-in the Te Raniera Huango Trust. Link is from the justice.govt.nz website.

Note we have only included the relevant Paragraphs pertaining to Ms Roberta Karangaroa, as she is our subject of concern, regarding Nark.Org.Nz (apart from Ms Sweeney obviously). You can read the full complaint and also that of the judges ruling on the link below.

Full document here: Maori Land Courts, justice.govt.nz

Dated on the 28th March 2013





 







 
Continuation and Judgement: From justice.govt.nz

Hearing was on the 4 July 2013 in Hastings and Judge Ruling on the 5 July 2013 

[1] On 2 November 2011 Mark Mansfield filed proceedings per s238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 seeking financial information from the trustees of Te Raniera Huango Trust. He claimed that they had failed to hold general meetings, provide annual accounts and be accountable to the beneficial owners.

More seriously Mr Mansfield alleged that the trustees had "embezzled" trust funds and accordingly had to be brought before the Court to account for this conduct. I note that Mr Mansfield had made these claims of lack of financial accountability against the trustees in 2009 and the proceedings had been before the Court since then.

[19] Then there is the matter of the $12,000 taken from the trust’s account by Roberta Karangaroa. In my earlier judgment I directed the trustees to recover the outstanding $2,500 from Karangaroa following her repayment of $9,500. It now emerges that Ms Karangaroa claims she has returned that amount to Mrs Edwards-Walker directly, which the latter denies. 

[20] It will be remembered that Ms Karangaroa had been approached to provide "governance training" to the trustees at the request of Mrs Edwards-Walker. At the hearing yesterday Mrs Edwards-Walker confirmed that she had known Ms Karangaroa for many years and had asked her to provide "governance training" to the trustees.

At the previous hearing the trustees accepted they had been persuaded by Ms Karangaroa to add her, a non-owner and a non-beneficiary of the land, to become a signatory for the trust using the pretext that having siblings as trustees signing cheques was not best practice.

 Ironically, as mentioned, Ms Karangaroa then proceeded to withdraw $12,000 from the trust for her own personal use with $9,500 recovered from her following a complaint to the Police. 

[21] Ms Edwards-Walker subsequently claimed that the trust’s then bankers had paid the money out to Ms Karangaroa on only one signature and that on her return from overseas Mrs Edwards-Walker had gone to the bank to sign a withdrawal slip to approve the payment after the fact.

The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming. Indeed, Mrs Edwards-Walker claimed that whenever arrangements were made with Ms Karangaroa to hold a meeting she was invariably unavailable at the last minute.

[22] As I mentioned in my previous judgment the trustees are liable to repay this amount if it could not be recovered from Ms Karangaroa. As it was Mrs Edwards-Walker who signed the withdrawal or payment slip, and without the approval of the trustees, I find that she is responsible to repay this amount to the trust. That said, it may now be appropriate for the trustees to put the matter in the hands of a collection agency, in the absence of either repayment or a tenable defence from Ms Karangaroa.

Mr Mark Mansfield's compliant was legally justifiable.

[38] The present application was precipitated by allegations made against the trustees by Mark Mansfield. His original complaints concerned the lack of information available to beneficiaries, lack of meetings and lack of annual accounts. On the face of the evidence before the Court it would appear that many of Mr Mansfield’s concerns have been borne out and his complaints justified.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see throughout this whole matter, Ms Roberta Karangaroa and her "governance skills" along with dipping into another Trust's money, is of particular concern.  The similarities' a quite striking, as to Ms Roberta Karaangaoa's elusiveness in (being contactable/available) when $12,000 was taken from the trust’s account

From the post above:

"The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming."

Both Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa were very good at becoming unavailable through out our experiences with Nark.Org.Nz, on the Community Group Page.  When they eventually managed to grace page from time to time, they were always using excuses why they were away and that their time was limited. 
 
Also Cherie's continuous, "personal financial burdens" that were endless. Once questions of missing monies were brought to light, they totally avoided answers to our concerns.
 
Yes, Ms Roberta Karangaroa is well experienced in "spinning the truth".  The only thing is both Cherie and Roberta keep contradicting themselves.

Now if this was going in November 2011, we certainly have more knowledge now on the Ms Roberta' background and her love for Trusts, Money, and certainly trying to obtain it paper free, obligation free, question free, evidence free and most importantly..... tax free! This is certainly the case with Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney, included.   

 From the Charites.govt.nz Website.....

http://www.register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/Search

The Charities that Ms Roberta Karangaroa established. These ones are registered, however she is involved with many that aren't, ie Nark, Personal land trusts among others. We learnt along this journey that just because a Trust, Charties, Org etc aren't funded; certainly doesn't mean they don't get huge donations which are conveniently unaccounted for.  The many events that Ms Karangaroa and Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney organized, brought in huge amounts. 
Officer NameCharity NameRegistration
NumberStatusDate
Roberta KarangaroaNational Te Koru Puawai Charitable TrustCC31518Registered23/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaRiverslea Tu Tangata Incorporated Charity TrustCC31450Registered22/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaHawkes Bay Community Law Centre TrustCC37364Registered3/02/2009
 
Roberta Karangaroa was also a trustee for the Maatangireia Trust. Non existent currently.



.






























Roberta certainly has many years experience in "governance" for trusts etc.

 *Interesting how, the moment a complaint was made to the Police, Ms Roberta Karangaroa coughed up most of it. 


Ms Roberta and Cherie are experienced over many years in creating, hui's, meetings, media, events, getting funding (including Government funding) for their scam ideas
 
They have numerously used "heart-breaking" issues in NZ to persuade many to donate to their scams.   So, it's certainly of no surprise that Ms Roberta Karangaroa (currently of the Riverslea Trust, Hastings, among other trusts) would be quite persuasive in getting money from Trusts, she can certainly talk her way of a paper bag...... 

Another interesting  point is, when all this was going on....... Pete George of Your Nz, (Nark.Org.NZ, Board member) still supported them.  All their spinning, lies, abusiveness toward members and non-accountability of where monies were?









Pete George Party Your Dunedin Standing for Dunedin City Council - Central Ward Dunedin City Mayor (dreamer)


Pete George, certainly has a way with words.  He constantly bleats out "Transparency" but never follows through with that word...... Pete you really need to listen to yourself.  You've certainly never been "Transparent" by any means.

 Not a good political move Pete George.

So being that we are the NZ Public, we  decided to do our Civic duty, and pay Pete a visit on his, "Pete George for Dunedin Mayor" Facebook page he created September last year.......quite a catchy title, "Good luck with that Pete, go live that dream!"



 

And after 10 hours.... our message was removed,  and he's suddenly  laying low.  Pete is about as Transparent as a Kiwi made Gum Boot!  



 
 
Yep, this explains it then...
 
This is information for the New Zealand Public, by the New Zealand Public. We are here to keep NZ informed on this serious issue regarding the Scam Nark.Org,nz and also the two woman who have endeavoured with their "causes, pleas, hui's, events...etc". Purely profit driven and for so long and had gone unnoticed until now.

Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.Nz and Roberta Kararangi of the Riverslea Trust, are quite probably two of the best scammers in NZ.



Mrs Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.NZ