Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Consumer NZ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consumer NZ. Show all posts

Friday, 5 December 2014

Cherie Sweeney eventually removes post after social uproar

 
There was no apology from Cherie Sweeney for instigating a hate campaign due to her post on the page, directing social abuse being hurled toward a woman she didn’t know or the factual circumstances that had taken place.  This women had not been charged or arrested for anything, and the Police had already posted on her post thread to inform the public. Interesting enough Cherie and her fake Org NARK are not mentioned in this article. However Cherie still portrays to the public that NARK is a real Org.

News item from Stuff.co.nz News:

Baby briefly unattended at KFC


 Last updated 18:25 04/12/2014

Baby briefly unattended at KFC

A Hastings mother will be referred to Child, Youth and Family after a baby boy was left briefly unattended at a fast-food outlet.

Sergeant Glen Yule said the mother and child arrived at the Hastings KFC restaurant with the baby’s grandmother at 12.30pm on Wednesday. The adults began to argue and left the store.
The child was in a baby capsule, which the mother put on the floor before following the grandmother into the car park.

The pair argued for a few minutes and the mother then returned for her baby.
By this time, concerned customers had picked up the child to care for it, and refused to give it back to its mother, Yule said.
“There was some confusion in the store about the mother’s intentions, and some customers became concerned and took it upon themselves to keep the baby safe.

“The mother made some unfortunate comments that may have been misconstrued.”
Fellow customer Shelly Bartlett said she could not believe the mother left her child, even for a minutes. “She didn’t even buy any food, just dumped the baby and left.
“I heard her say she didn’t even want him.”

The police were called and the boy was returned to the mother and grandmother’s care. As was normal practice, a referral would be made to Child, Youth and Family, Yule said.

Since our last post (Link here), the following update has been posted on Cherie Sweeney’s Stop death and abuse of children’s Facebook page. Link here:

Her previous post was removed and this is the new post:

Dated 4/12/2014


Thank you to all our community people who spoke up and have helped actioned this mummy to get support. Without your concerns we would not have been able to awhi and get your voices heard.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/…/638…/Baby-briefly-unattended-at-KFC
A Hastings mother will be referred to Child, Youth and Family after a baby boy was left briefly unattended at a fast-food outlet.
stuff.co.nz
Like · ·
  • Mahara Tahuhu I'm pleased to see you've removed the misleading post alleging the baby was abandoned. Well done for taking this step.
    I only hope you can now make things right by acknowledging on this page that the previous post was misleading and that it caused unne
    cessary aded distress and harm to the mother, her whanau and community. A simple retraction can do wonders. I sincerely hope you'll make the positive choice to follow up the removal of the aforementioned post with this second action.
    • STOP Death and Abuse of our Children Retract what? We will continue to support our community members who have concerns for our kids. This is what NARK does. Support those who speak up. The kaupapa is to empower and encourage them to whakamanahia them.
    • Mahara Tahuhu Why, retract your allegation that the woman 'abandoned' the baby, of course. Or did you forget it (and that inflammatory screenshot) immediately once you'd deleted the OP?
      I made several salient points in my last comment under that post in regards to the damage social media can do when folks are given incorrect or inaccurate information and the dangers of induly influencing public opinion. I do hope you read and considered them before you deleted the post using the word 'abandoned' with the accompanying screenshot which was both damning and inflammatory (and seemingly an inaccurate version of events now that we have more information).
      Considering your continued refusal to acknowledge that you were a bit hasty and unwise in your choice of material when you posted your OP though, I suspect you didn't consider in great depth what I wrote previously - assuming you read it at all.
      Like · 1 · 8 hrs
    • STOP Death and Abuse of our Children Have you had a talk to anyone involved? They are sticking by their korero & know facts. I am not going to go on but simply there were multiple concerns from different people and they were justified. The mum in question is now receiving the urgent help she requires. Respect your opinion but doesnt mean I agree with all you say.
    • Mahara Tahuhu As previously stated, you did use the word 'abandoned' and the screenshot you put up accused this mother of trying to drive away from the location. It also said there were two people with the mother but the police summary of events said she was accompanied only by her own mother, with whom she was arguing.
      There is a world of difference between two people arguing in a car park and three people getting in a car and trying to drive off - surely you agree with that, at least? Therefore surely you can appreciate that regardless of your good intentions you used words and evidence that were inaccurate. As a result this woman was abused and vilified on social media. Rationalise your aims any way you like, but your choices didn't show her you supported her. Conversely, it demonised her. You really, really need to acknowledge this. I feel it's important.
      How much you believe of the witness accounts is irrelevant (and as I said in earlier posts, witness accounts are not 100% reliable, emotion is contagious and there are many factors which can influence their recollection whether directly or indirectly - if you like I can do a quick hunt for examples as psychological research has examined this behaviour).
      The relevant point is that inaccurate information was posted publicly on social media. It was shared and seen by a great deal of people who then formed an opinion based on the (inaccurate) information they read. That is what I'm referring to when I encourage you to retract your original accusation.
    • Mahara Tahuhu Additionally, an impartial third party who does not personally know any of those involved and has not been influenced by emotionally driven witness account is in an excellent position to critically analyse the consequences of posts like the original, hence why I'm continuing to reiterate my points.
  • Rhiannon Victoria Exactly as I had suspected, people jumping to conclusions, flinging accusations, demanding they don't give the baby back. All based on one persons account. I hate how people are so quick to judge in these situations without even knowing the facts! Whats gives us the right to be judge n jury...? I hope ya'll dont ever have to be in a situation like that...
  • Jayden Langley Finally some positive comments. This is my family and they amount of negative, hurting comments and false information that were said was just inappropriate. I wasn't there but reading all the comments about my mum especially was hurting but that FB for yah.
    Like · Reply · 4 · 20 hrs
  • Claire Bryant I think this had been blown out of proportion big time hope baby and mum are ok. It's not easy being a parent. I don't think what she did is right but it has been made into a big drama
    Like · Reply · 2 · 23 hrs
  • Keri Herd For god sake I fight with my husband does that mean that mychildren are unsafe?? no way, the fact this mum moved it away from her child is commendable her baby was not in any emmediate danger and the mum returned another case of wasting cyf time when there are children that are getting beaten and murdered. I feel sorry for the mum and I think this whole welldone for getting your voices heard when not one person on this site was there yet you bullied the authorities into setting cyfs on this mum!!!
  • Nicola Hanna I'm confused. If the link to the article is correct a mother still walked out of a shop purposefully leaving her baby behind. For whatever reason this isn't and never would be okay in any circumstance. I'm glad she had been referred to CYFS and hope she can get the support and assistance she needs to be a better parent.

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Educating yourself is the best defence! Info from the IRD NZ

The following information is from IRD NZ the Link here: www.ird.govt.nz/.../our-compliance-focus-2010-11.pdf 
 
Non-profit groups
Non-profit groups, eg, society clubs, amateur sports clubs, charities and district societies, are exempt from income tax. There are 26,000 registered charities in New Zealand. Non-profit groups employ over 200,000 staff and volunteers—just over 9% of the working population.
Updated webpages for non-profit groups
In 2009–10 we developed a better understanding of the non-profit sector and how best to interact with them. Research showed us that the key to improving compliance for non-profit groups is in understanding their communication needs.
In March 2010 we launched an updated non-profit section on our website. We’ve tailored the refreshed site to meet non-profit groups’ needs.
 
The new non-profit section at www.ird.govt.nz/non-profit includes information about employing staff and volunteers, paying and claiming GST, recovering donations and grants, and keeping records and filing returns.
The feedback, so far, has been positive with non-profit groups telling us it gives them a better understanding of what they need to do to comply.
We based our refresh on changes non-profit groups asked for through research we did in August 2009. Overall, we found they prefer targeted information.
 
Misusing charities tax-exempt status
The non-profit sector provides important community services and products that make a difference for thousands of New Zealanders. To recognise this, registered charities don’t have to pay tax.
The majority of charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by a small group of individuals who try to exploit their tax-exempt status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.
We will address misuse of charities tax-exempt status by:
·         working with the Charities Commission to reduce opportunities for misusing tax-exempt status
·         identifying charities that create false receipts and invoices, organisations that claim to be charities but aren’t, and claims from claimants who are trustees, officers or who derive a monetary benefit from the charity
(in this case NARK.Org.NZ founder)
·         investigating and applying sanctions and penalties to anyone who chooses not to comply with their obligations and prosecuting them, where necessary.

Non-profit groups’ awareness of their obligations

Non-profit groups play an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the giving schemes. They need to provide authentic receipts for donations and ensure arrangements they put in place to encourage these donations don’t compromise customer privacy and Inland Revenue systems.
We work with non-profit groups that aren’t registered with the Charities Commission. We give advice about the registration process and make sure they understand their tax obligations and the potential consequences of not registering. The non-profit groups we’ve contacted have responded positively to our information about their obligations.
We will work with non-profit groups to ensure they:
·         understand charitable giving, eg, the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes
·         comply with the rules.

Tax incentives for charitable giving

New Zealand offers tax incentives to people who give money to registered charities. They can claim part of it back as a tax credit, either as a donation tax credit or through the payroll giving scheme.
But, in the past year, we’ve identified a number of issues that could affect the integrity of the tax system. They include:
·         ineligible or fraudulent donation tax credit claims being filed
·         people claiming a donation tax credit without meeting the application requirements
·         uncertainties about an organisation’s status, or interpretation of the donee organisation rules.
(No interpretation as to Nark.Org.NZ, being a Trust, Charity, Cause, Organization....)
We want individuals and businesses to understand the charitable giving process and follow the correct processes for making claims.

We will address tax issues around charitable giving by:

·         publicising the donation tax credit and payroll giving schemes to donors and non-profit organisations, eg, contributing to an inter-agency education programme
·         educating tax agents and employers about the application requirements for charitable giving
·         educating individuals who file an Individual tax return (IR 3) income tax return about the steps we follow when processing their donation tax credit claims
·         raising awareness about how to access information on the donations tax credit requirements and the payroll giving scheme
·         improving our internal systems to quickly and accurately pick up incorrect and fraudulent claims, eg, income verification and tolerance checks to find input errors
·         continuing to investigate, apply sanctions and penalties, and prosecute, if necessary.
 
Misuse of charities
 
In recognition of the non-profit sector’s contribution to our communities, registered charities are allowed various exemptions and concessions. They also receive public and private donations, for which tax credits are claimed.
 
Most charities are legitimate, but they can be targeted by people wanting to take advantage of their tax-exempt or concessionary status. Charities have been used to abuse the tax system through aggressive tax planning and fraud.

In the past year, we have seen a growing range of abusive practices involving charities. These do not appear to involve generic schemes for tax avoidance. Instead, some taxpayers and their advisors are trying to use charities as a tax-saving device.

Increasingly, we are working in partnership with the Charities Commission (whose business functions have recently been moved to the Department of Internal Affairs) to identify charities and individuals whose activities warrant investigation. We are also developing appropriate compliance strategies.
 
A key resource for this work is the “open government data” that the Charities Commission now publishes on its website. Our information exchange with the Commission also helps us to identify existing and emerging trends in the misuse of charities.
 
We also liaise regularly with the ATO.

We are refining the legal and technical issues for cases involving charities, and have resourced specialist investigators to identify abusive practices and progress  cases swiftly.

We will investigate people who enter into tax avoidance schemes involving charities or who create false receipts and invoices. We will also focus on organisations that claim to be charities but are not, and on claims from trustees, officers or other people who receive payment from the charity.
 
Where appropriate, we will prosecute those who choose not to comply with their obligations.
 
 What you can do
 
• Make sure you understand your obligations. Avoid entering into any scheme that uses charities inappropriately. If you are unsure about your obligations, contact us for confirmation.
 
• If you or your client have misused a charity’s status,  you can contact us and make a voluntary disclosure, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: voluntary disclosure).
 
 • If you have information about the misuse of a charity, you can report it to us anonymously through our website, www.ird.govt.nz (keyword: anonymous).  
 

Charitable organisations
Nga whakahaere aroha

 
Charitable organisations are organisations (whether incorporated or not) that carry out charitable activities or exist exclusively for charitable purposes. Since 1 July 2008 a charitable organisation needs to be registered by the Charities Commission to receive tax exemptions.

Income tax and charitable organisations

Charitable organisations are liable for income tax if they operate with no written rules, constitution or trust deed or they operate under a set of rules, a constitution or a trust deed that does not meet the requirements for income tax exemption or they use business income for charitable purposes outside New Zealand. Learn about rates of income tax, when to file returns and possible exemptions.

Registration of charities

The Charities Commission maintains a register of charitable entities that opened on 1 February 2007. Registration is voluntary, but if a charity wishes to be exempt from income tax and donors of gifts exempt from gift duty it will need to register.

Transitional guidelines for charities

These administrative guidelines are intended to provide clarity about the tax position for entities that have not completed the process of registering with the Charities Commission by 1 July 2008.
 
$1,000 income deduction
Some non-profit organisations may qualify for a $1,000 income deduction. This deduction makes the first $1,000 of income that organisation earns free from income tax.

If your organisation earns under $1,000

If your organisation's net income is below $1,000 per year, then the deduction effectively means you are exempt from income tax.
   
Therefore you won't be taxed on any income you earn, and don't need to file any income tax returns.
However, we recommend your organisation keeps records of any financial transactions, in case they are required for future reference. 

Note

An exemption or deduction of income tax doesn't automatically qualify your organisation for an exemption to all taxes. You may still be liable to pay other taxes, such as GST.

If your organisation earns over $1,000

If your organisation's net income is above $1,000 per year, you may be eligible for a deduction of up to $1,000. If you subtract this amount from your organisation's income, you reduce the amount of tax to pay.
   
To qualify for this deduction, your organisation will need to have written rules. An organisation without rules or a constitution won't qualify for the $1,000 income deduction.

Applying for the $1,000 income deduction

If your organisation doesn't qualify for an income tax exemption, you can apply for a deduction against your net income.
   
A non-profit organisation is allowed a deduction for the amount equal to the lesser of:
  • $1,000, or
  • the amount that would be the net income of the organisation.
To apply for a deduction, your organisation will need to follow the same processes as applying for the income exemption.

Applying for an income tax exemption

If you're a charitable organisation, go to the Charities Commission website to register as a charity.
   
If you're a non-profit body of any other kind, you may qualify for an income tax exemption.
Income tax exemptions aren't automatic. You'll need to apply to us in writing - go to "Contact us" for our address details.
   
Your organisation can send us a draft document of your exemption application for us to review. We can then suggest any changes before your organisation goes through the process and cost of having it submitted.
   
When you apply for the exemption, please include the following information about your organisation:
  • IRD number - if you don't have one, you'll need to apply. Please complete an IRD number application - non-individual (IR596)
  • a copy of its rules, constitution, trust deed or other founding documents - preferably in draft (before being finalised) form
  • a copy of its certificate of incorporation (if applicable)
  • a letter stating the type(s) of exemption being requested, eg sports club
  • details of how it has been or will be operating.
We'll then give you written confirmation of your organisation's tax exempt status for income tax.

Charitable purpose

Charitable purposes include:
  • the relief of poverty
  • the advancement of education
  • the advancement of religion
  • activities for the benefit of the community.
An organisation's purposes must fall within one of these categories to be charitable. Its activities or aims must be for public purposes and the benefit must be available to a large section of the community. In addition, it must not be carried on for the benefit or profit of any individual. If the beneficiaries are limited by blood ties the charitable purpose can still be met in some circumstances.

Many organisations consider themselves charitable because of the work they do or because they are registered under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. As a result, they may also think they are exempt from income tax. However, from 1 July 2008, an organisation will only be tax-exempt if it is a registered charity. Such an exemption does not apply to goods and services tax (GST) or PAYE. The organisation must still account for these.

Your organisation's income tax return

If your organisation has an annual turnover of less than $1,000, you don't need to file an income tax return. You'll simply need to keep sufficient records for your organisation.

If your income is above this threshold, or is expected to be, then you'll need to file an income tax return. The table below outlines what income return you'll need to file, depending on the type of your organisation.

If your organisation is a...then you'll need to file an...
registered and incorporated companyIR4 company income tax return
trust or estateIR6 income tax return for estates or trusts
club, society or associationIR9 income tax return for clubs or societies
 Go to Filing your income tax return at the end of the tax year


N.A.R.K Org.NZ threshold was well over $1,000