Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Cheryl Simes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cheryl Simes. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 February 2013

Will the NZ Pubic ever receive any "Proof" from Ms Cherie?

This is the Story of a Fake Org,Trust,Charity, or Other.....namely N.A.R.K.Org.NZ and that of its Founder "Currently known as Cherie Sweeney" in NZ.....



Well, we (The NZ Public), have been online  for a little over a year now......



Were the NZ Public provided with any kind of "Evidence" documentation regarding Nark financials of any kind, from its beginning's until now?


No.


Was Ms Cherie (Whatever her name is?) prepared to let us see, anything (besides a typed up document) regarding that?


No.


After two years, Is N.A.R.K Org, Trust, or other Registered Today?


No.



Did she abuse, attack and threaten her "Org" members (current and past) over suspicions of mismanagement of monies and also that of her current lifestyle?


Yes!


Did she use Fake Profiles to attack, abuse and threaten the NZ Public and admins on our Facebook Page?


Yes!



Will The Public Ever Hear back from Ms Cheryl Sims her "Pro Bono" Lawyer, regarding this whole issue?


We don't know......


Will Cherie Sweeney (Whatever her last name is?) ever show any of the NZ Public, what happened to the financials? 


We don't know....



Two Posts of Ms Cherie on the Tangata Whenua Article:






















Ms Cherie Sweeney,  after we publicly posted her "other" Profile on our Blog.







Rest assured, if we ever found anything else or had spoken to anyone "using Sonny Lee" we would certainly post it on both our blog and that on our Facebook Page:

Originally, we were once called: 

Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money).

Two Articles of Cherie and Nark: 2012


Nark founder accused of using charity funds: from Stuff.co.nz

Last updated 05:00 03/03/2012


Money dispute for Nark: from the NZ Herald. 

5:25 AM Sunday Mar 4, 2012

Due to getting a lot of the NZ Public coming onto our page requiring answers as we all were, Ms Cherie was quite determined to stop that. After continuous attacks and our pages being pulled down by Cherie and Company, (exactly 7 times) for need of answers and "Evidenced ones at that", we had to change our Facebook Page name:

Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz?

As for being a threat?

Again, Ms Cherie uses her "Victim" performance, she has used many times through out the years for empathy and support. We have certainly been NO threat, and have always posted our findings openly for all the NZ Public, to know.

Perhaps her idea of being "threatening" is the NZ Public, requiring evidence of, Where did the money go too?, (which the NZ Public had given greatly for the cause).

Perhaps, she also thinks of "us" (The NZ Public), as being a real threat because we had exposed the truth about, who this lady was/is.

Also, that of her highly unprofessional "fake" Org, Trust, Charity or other....

Who is it really helping?

From the beginning of this whole story, we certainly hadn't even thought, we would find out what we did.
We also didn't expect Ms Cherie's constant refusal of providing any "evidence", and her constant dedication to threaten, attack and abuse us, so that other NZ Public members, would not find out about this entire saddening situation.

We have always told Ms Cherie, this is a great concern and we (The NZ Public) won't be silenced.

Although her continuous attempts to silence us have been phenomenal, to say the least....


There hasn't been much of anything in the Paper or Media about N.A.R.K Org since it became public of the mismanagement of funds at the beginning of last year. Also regarding Cherie and her "Org's" helping in the community.

Why?

For a cause, that is meant to be consistently trying to help, Stop Child Abuse in NZ against our most vulnerable:

What have "they"(NARK and Cherie), done during this entire year?

What Child or Family has Cherie and NARK directly helped, from the beginning?

With Cherie so focused on our Answer/Information page, 
(she calls hate page), with no evidence provided, then......

What is she actually doing for her "Org" and most importantly the Children?

Its been a long journey and for some, a lot longer. The entire NZ Public have the right to be informed about this issue and make their own conclusions about Cherie (What ever her last name is?) and that of her Unregistered Charity, Org, Trust or other in NZ.


Note to Ms Cherie:

We are all saddened by this issue and that of your continuous abuse towards both the NZ Public and the administrators on our Facebook page.

We are greatly stunned by your, total unprofessional behaviour of both yourself and the non accountability in regards to your Org.

The real world, Ms Cherie consists of the children who are living lives of abuse and neglect and who are in desperate need of help.

What World are you living in?

It is NOT about you and how you trying to protect yourself and your Org, from what is and has really been happening.

All children have the right to be safe and protected and most of all loved. There is so many children in NZ, who are being abused and neglected its a major concern!

These children YOU say you are helping through your cause, yet again you give NO evidence of this.

Who are you really helping, Ms Cherie? 

Why do you always contradict yourself?



From the Givealitte Website Update:



Today 17/02/2013 




NARK "Givealittle" Donation Page: Declined.

Ms Cherie,

Kura, Tahuparae Cheriek. Cheriek Kara Robinson. Smith. Kurarangi.Evangeline Marie Kara. . Karaka. Supercheriecherie.Cheriek baby.cheriecherie.


WHO ARE YOU?



Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money)!!

Monday, 4 February 2013

More information Re: Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd

Pro Bono Lawyer Ms Cheryl Simes:

Reposting from the second original post of Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd, Ms Cheryl Simes on to our page for the NZ Public's News Feed.


Well, it's the end of November, and that's when we promised you an update on NARK's finances etc.

We haven't finished going through the detailed documentation Cherie provided to us some time ago - that delay is entirely our responsibility, not Cherie's. (We've been a bit distracted with our own matters plus a sudden rush of paying work.)

Thus far we have verified that, although at one stage there were several bank accounts for NARK, funds were transferred properly from one account to another when this was all being tidied up. T-shirt orders are documented, as are all the refunds when the T-shirt project did not eventuate.

We have not found any unexplained withdrawals or payments, or any gaps in documentation.

Payments to Cherie have reimbursed her for what appear to be valid expenses incurred in NARK matters. (Cherie has also provided information about other, NARK-related expenditure by her for which she has not sought reimbursement.)

We have not yet perused the records of meetings to check that all such payments were formally approved. We shall do so. We have no reason to believe they were not.

We have also not yet checked whether there are receipts for all such reimbursements - there are a lot of receipts which we have not yet gone through. Again, we shall do so.

Not sure whether we'll get this finished before the end of the year. We want to run this through some accounting software to make it easy to cross-check and summarise, and that may have to wait until early January.

Certainly there is nothing to support the allegations made against Cherie of financial mismanagement or deception.
Like ·  · 30 November 2012 at 22:50

  • Jan Curtis How can you make the above statement, "we have not found any unexplained payments or withdrawals" regarding finances when you also state all receipts etc have not been checked!!

  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd Because the receipts that have not yet been checked are for the list of expenses incurred that add up to one reimbursement payment from NARK to Cherie. There is a list of those expenses. (I simply have yet to double-check that each such expense listed is supported by a receipt.) There are no payments from the NARK bank accounts that are unexplained. (Nor are there any payments to Mike/Cherie's mortgage.)

  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue Whose name is the mortgage in and whose name was it in at the time of this begging con job? Post a copy of the mortgage showing whose name it was in, and all correspondence supporting the claim that Westpac were about to foreclose and conduct a mortgagee sale - it's all just lies.

    All the money was spent on Cherie, that's indisputable. On her comforts, her self promotion, meals, her accommodation, travel, her political prostitution and narcissistic and deluded self promotion. You're fooling nobody.

  • Transparency NZ Katherine Raue "T-shirt orders are documented, as are all the refunds when the T-shirt project did not eventuate. " - Please post all these "documented" financial records here as soon as possible, we're all waiting.

  • Cherie Kurarangi From-Nark This is not the page to post documents, its a fake page, the so called 20 something likes are a few people with multiple sign in names, Thats not transparency at all, the documents and my substantial evidence inclluding minutes, records, receipts, and my personal mortgage info and proof of our everything including our situation I have handed over to our Lawyer which is appropriate. Seriously who ever handed over documents to a facebook page? ever?

Just reposting from Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd dated on Friday. Do Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd, even know what they are going on about? More so, that of the "Pro Bono" Lawyer to Cherie (whatever her last name is), Ms Cheryl Simes? Never the less, we will continue to wait, as the saga continues.......interesting times ahead NZ ;)

Their message as follows....
Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd:

Well, it's the end of November, and that's when we promised you an update on NARK's finances etc.

We haven't finished going through the detailed documentation Cherie provided to us some time ago - that delay is entirely our responsibility, not Cherie's. (We've been a bit distracted with our own matters plus a sudden rush of paying work.)

Thus far we have verified that, although at one stage there were several bank accounts for NARK, funds were transferred properly from one account to another when this was all being tidied up. T-shirt orders are documented, as are all the refunds when the T-shirt project did not eventuate.

We have not found any unexplained withdrawals or payments, or any gaps in documentation.

Payments to Cherie have reimbursed her for what appear to be valid expenses incurred in NARK matters. (Cherie has also provided information about other, NARK-related expenditure by her for which she has not sought reimbursement.)

We have not yet perused the records of meetings to check that all such payments were formally approved. We shall do so. We have no reason to believe they were not.

We have also not yet checked whether there are receipts for all such reimbursements - there are a lot of receipts which we have not yet gone through. Again, we shall do so.

Not sure whether we'll get this finished before the end of the year. We want to run this through some accounting software to make it easy to cross-check and summarise, and that may have to wait until early January.

Certainly there is nothing to support the allegations made against Cherie of financial mismanagement or deception.
131Like ·  · 

  • Lovelee Leigh likes this.

  • Lisa Whyte Did she report to winz that she was 'fundraising' for her mortgage on here? I bet not

  • Lovelee Leigh did she report that to Kiwilaw?

  • Jan Curtis How can they say they have discovered nothing untoward when also saying they haven't finished going through receipts etc......unprofessional in my book.

  • Cheryl Simes Simple - I've checked all debits from the various bank accounts. None of those are odd or unexplained or inappropriate. A couple are bulk payments for reimbursement of many small expenses. Those expenses are listed and the list matches the total paid. What I haven't yet checked are all the individual receipts that go with those lists.

  • Cheryl Simes Not sure what is 'unprofessional' about that. It's a progress report. Surely it would be unprofessional if I said I had checked everything when I hadn't?

  • Cheryl Simes Oh yes, and nothing has been paid from the NARK bank accounts to Cherie/Mike's mortgage.

  • Jan Curtis That's because she gleaned the money from her FB friends.... common knowledge!!

  • Lovelee Leigh not sure why anyone is bothered 'clearing' her name ..shes a no body now anyway ... does nothing .. last I heard about her she had rung a friend crying her eyes out wanting someone else to take over NARK .... best to support than NARK and destroy lives.

  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Cheryl Simeswho actually owns the house? Do you have proof of that at least? Is the mortgage hers as she had stated in the:
    "Help Me save my house from Mortgagee Sale"
    Public Event • By Cherie Nark NZ
    posted on the Mortgage Plea Event page dated Wednesday, February 15, 2012 at 5:00pm until Sunday, April 1, 2012 at 9:30pm. Did ALL these funds the Public helped her with, actually go toward the mortgage?

  • Jan Curtis It was stated way back the house is owned by her partner and ex wife, the comment was made by some family member.

  • Anya Raupunga Well well even a lawyer just cant keep you unhappy peeps satisfied with FACTS can she, really Lisa whyte? she isnt on winz so what then?, in fact her annual income from IRD who she showed to her trusted few shows a years income of $3500 so who she ripping off ? not winz, not you, not anyone, and she aint a nobody otherwise u wodnt be here crapping on her on this page lugleigh but u and ur groce pics of u and Karl are more that enuff from u. None of u have any mana or evidence to hate on her, u just want to ABUSE on her oh and those she trusted like me & polly g who donated to help her wif her house got the whole facts incuding deposit slips, mortgage account, details showing payments made etc.. And please remember she only asked 4 help from FRIENDS and FAMILY of which u are definitely not..., Kate Raue stop abusing her OK u are a fake charity Foccers is just you alone not regstrd not a charity just u from the anita backpackers in carterton they told us all the truth bout you

  • Who is Cherie Sweeney from NARK.Org.nz? Anya Raupungathe lawyer Ms Cheryl Simes hasn't provided anything yet? Are we to take words as Proof? Please don't insult the NZ Public's intelligence. The reality Anya is, we are needing answers and proof of what we have asked for now ten months going and still continuing. Wanting Answers and Proof of answers are not abusive, you seem to be confused with the term Abuse. We the NZ Public have contributed greatly to her "Fake Org" and also those who donated to her many "Plea's" for help. 

    Stop detracting from the issue here, Anya which IS Ms Cherie (Whatever her last name is?) and her "Fake Charity".

    This is why we are here, which yet again she has not provided us with anything in regards to our donations we gave. As we have previously said, she knows how to plead for money etc from the NZ Public regarding her and her "Fake Charity, Org, Cause etc, but once questions are raised as to where the money are going too and had gone too, Ms Cherie then in turn abuses and threatens the NZ Public along with her Aunty Roberta. No respect for the NZ Public at all, but she certainly needs the NZ Public for want of monies and limelight . 

    Oh wait, once monies where found unaccounted for, she also starts to blame everyone who worked /s hard for her and their hearts where for the cause. Very unusual for an experienced Business Women........Where was Cherie during all the preparations and meetings? Thats right, away! As per usual.....unless of course she needed to attend media or hui's etc, then suddenly she appears.....Answers with Proof, is what is Required!! Need we have to remind you again? Kia Ora! Ms Cherie and her having Mana? No, certainly No Mana there.

  • Lovelee Leigh Ohh Anya Raupunga u cant pull the wool over your eyes can you. But then I know who you are. 

    U cant pull the wool over my eyes either .. seems u dont know what yr talking about and just trying to start a scrap. Friiends of mine have been talking to some of those u claim support you .. you are a bullshit artist!


More post's on our page: NZ Public still waits..... 


Must be a lot of records to go through with Cherie (Whatever her last name is?) and her Nark record keeping documents? We will continue to wait....as we have been for about 9 months now lol ;)
111Like ·  · 



I believe Cherie has just given birth to a baby so that may explain the reasons for the delay in the information we requested.
1Unlike ·  · 

 







Concerned member of the Public of NZ, post from on Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd



Facebook Page:
Seasons greetings Ms Cheryl Sims, hope the New Year is going well. We are needing confirmation as to if you are still representing your client Ms Cherie (Whatever her last name is?). We know its been stressful for you as with your previous comment made about how you were feeling a little depressed, and we hope you are ok. Can you please advise us as to when you will be presenting your evidence please? Thank you kind regards the NZ Public.


  • Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd I am feeling so guilty because I haven't finished that yet, and it's entirely my responsibility, not Cherie's. We (Kiwilaw) had a setback at the end of last year when we almost negotiated a resolution with the Ministry of Justice about reinstatement as a legal-aid provider, and then the agreement fell through at the last minute. Mid January we reached agreement again and then it didn't work either. Each setback meant a drop in energy (and also the need to put more time into those issues instead of finishing off this work for you and Cherie). Finally the legal-aid provider approval is in place, and THAT has meant more distraction because of having to redo paperwork and inform clients. (You'll note that we haven't even put a notification on Facebook about it - that's a comment on the energy levels and the juggling at present). Oh yes, and the diary was thrown into chaos after a 5-minute judicial conference turned into 2 days (Judge Cocurullo does that sometimes). And I have a sudden cluster of court deadlines this week. I was going to spend tomorrow (Anniversary Day) catching up, but I've decided I need to take time for myself and so I'm not going to spend it working. (Right now, it's 11 pm and I'm about to email submissions to Wellington that were due on Friday. That's quite enough, for now.)

  • Stan Redd Thank you for responding, yes its quite late. When you manage to get some free time after you have your rest of course, could you please let us know when you are able to update us please? Thank you again Cheryl Simes hope you get a well deserved rest.
Reposting on our Facebook Page:
 
Note the empty spaces, were abusive posts admin has removed.

Just a message from Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd for the NZ Public:
She will be taking a break for rest.

Kiwilaw Advocates Ltd

I am feeling so guilty because I haven't finished that yet, and it's entirely my responsibility, not Cherie's. We (Kiwilaw) had a setback at the end of last year when we almost negotiated a resolution with the Ministry of Justice about reinstatement as a legal-aid provider, and then the agreement fell through at the last minute. Mid January we reached agreement again and then it didn't work either. Each setback meant a drop in energy (and also the need to put more time into those issues instead of finishing off this work for you and Cherie). Finally the legal-aid provider approval is in place, and THAT has meant more distraction because of having to redo paperwork and inform clients. (You'll note that we haven't even put a notification on Facebook about it - that's a comment on the energy levels and the juggling at present). Oh yes, and the diary was thrown into chaos after a 5-minute judicial conference turned into 2 days (Judge Cocurullo does that sometimes). And I have a sudden cluster of court deadlines this week. I was going to spend tomorrow (Anniversary Day) catching up, but I've decided I need to take time for myself and so I'm not going to spend it working. (Right now, it's 11 pm and I'm about to email submissions to Wellington that were due on Friday. That's quite enough, for now.)
Sunday at 23:05
Like ·  · 





Hello NZ Public, we forgot add to the Kiwilaw Advocates LTD post, that we (NZ Public) respect Ms Cheryl Sim's needs her rest at this time. She has had a huge workload, and requires her much needed time-out for herself. Thank you, Admin :)
Unlike ·  · 


Will the Public of NZ ever hear back from this unusual lawyer? We can't be sure. It has nearly been a year, (on our page) but even longer, when Cherie (Whatever her last name is?) began collecting money in from the tragedy in Ngaruawahia. 

 No Transparency of where any monies have gone too?, No record keeping?  No Audits? And N.A.R.K Org, Trust, Charity or "other" is currently still not registered, after all this time.  Some thing is very wrong with this issue. This is a real concern.