Who Is Cherie Kurarangi Kara Sweeney?

Cherie Sweeney

Cherie Sweeney
Star Now
Showing posts with label Pete George. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pete George. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

More online information about indentifying and avioding Charity Scams

Articles from America on Charity Scams:
A more in-depth look at the different kinds of Charity Scams.

Please note: the IRS or CRA (America) is equivalent to IRD in NZ.

How to Spot a Charity Scam Artist- link for article:   USA

By
 
Many kind-hearted individuals and businesses make financial donations towards the end of the year. Unfortunately, online scam artists count on this and step up their efforts to steal valuable identifying information, load your computer with viruses, and swindle donors through Email solicitation campaigns. 

 How Email Charity Scam Artists Con Donors

Scam artists send out their mass email campaigns asking for charitable donations for a variety of causes. Online scam artists have gotten more sophisticated and are no longer simply asking you to mail them information or offering a hyperlink (usually to a virus or form to input identifying information.) Many scam artists are now taking the time to develop actual "charity" websites in an attempt to convince you that they are real.
 
Before you make an online donation to any charity you are unfamiliar with check them out.

Unfortunately, not all charities are listed in the online IRS database (which is about two years behind in listing charities it has approved for tax exemption status.) If you cannot find the charity online, call the IRS or your state's tax board.
 
Typically, only multi-million dollar charities are listing in registries like GuideStar. Even the Better Business Bureau (BBB), which is now starting to list charities, is misleading, because to get your charity listed with the BBB, you only have to pay a (steep) registration fee.

But you can still spot a scam artist by being alert to the following dead giveaways that a charity is a scam.

Charities That Ask for Too Much Information Are Scams
 
Any charity that asks for too much information, including your date of birth, social security number or driver's license information is a scam.

Charities are not required by the IRS or state charity laws to collect this information and they do not need this information to process a donation or issue a tax receipt.

Unsolicited Mass Email Campaigns Are Dead Give Aways!
 
Charities are bound by CAN SPAM Laws - they are not allowed to contact you through purchased mass email lists, and they cannot use web robots to collect Email addresses from public Internet sources.
 
In fact, unless you have previously donated to a particular charity, I would be highly suspicious of any charity that contacted you via Email out of the blue.
 
Discard any Email that is sent to "Undisclosed Recipients." It is almost certainly a scam.

Charities Do Not Send Attachments in Solicitations Legitimate

Legitimate charities are smart about their solicitations. They know people are unlikely to open emails with attachments and they do not send them.

Do not open any charity Email with an attachment. And, before you click on any hyperlink in a solicitation Email be sure you are not clicking on a virus link.
 
If you are not sure how to do this, read How to Spot Fake Hyperlinks in Emails.
 
Fake Charity Website Dead Giveaways
 
Check out the charity's website before you visit it or click on Email hyperlinks. The fastest and easiest way is to check out the website's domain registration information.
 
To see when a website went live, visit www.Whois.sc and enter in the domain name. Whois.sc will tell you when the website went live, where its servers are located, etc. You do not have to create an account, and basic information about websites is free.
 
Scammers almost always purchase domain names for one year. They expect to get caught and shut down and discard the domain. Whois.sc allows you to look at when the domain registration expires.
  
If it will expire in less than one year, they might be a scam artist.

 How To Determine If your Charity is Legitimate

By
 
It is nice to give to others, and to help out those in need. When you choose a charity or cause to donate your money to, you need to make sure that you are giving a legitimate organization that will use your money for the purpose that you intended. It is your money that you are giving, so you should be sure that the charity or cause support your beliefs and your purposes when you give.
 
Here's How:
  1. First, you need to determine which charity or cause that you want to give to. For example if you want to donate a gift or money for children over the holidays you should have several different options available in your area to choose from. If you are choosing to help fight cancer or another cause you may different organizations to choose from as well.
  2. Second, you need to make sure that the organization you are giving to is legitimate. An easy way to do this is make sure it is a national organization with a large track record. You can check with your state to see if they are registered as a nonprofit. Many nonprofits also post where the contributions go on their websites. If you donate to a large organization such as the Red Cross you may be able to choose to support a specific need or cause.
  3. Third, you need to make sure that you are donating through a legitimate channel. For example, people have gone door to door collecting donations, and claiming that they belong to an organization when they do not. Usually you are best to contact your local chapter of the organization or the national organization and donate directly to them.
  4. Fourth, if you donate on the Internet be sure that you use a secure connection. You also need to make sure that the site is legitimate and not a site that was put up by someone other than the organization that you are trying to donate to. Be especially careful if you are linking to the site through an email that you received.
Tips:
  1. Giving money is a great way to help others. It can help you to feel empowered and to take control of your finances as you take time to donate on a regular basis. Many financial advisors recommend giving money on a regular basis.
  2. You should determine how much you can give and stick to your budget. You may choose to divide it between several different organizations or causes or you may choose to give to just one. The help that you give will be appreciated. You can also claim the donation as a tax deduction.
  3. Take advantage of the opportunities to donate through your work. Many companies will offer an incentive if you will contribute to United Way or another organization through your work. If you are comfortable giving to United Way it is easy to have the money automatically deducted from your paycheck each month.
  4. If you do not have the money to give, consider donating your time to a cause that you feel is important. Many people in their twenties spend time mentoring children and teenagers through Big Brothers and Big Sisters or other similar organizations. You can also give smaller donations of goods to your local food pantry to help when you have a little extra money. 
 
What You Need 
  • Money  
  • Time 

Avoid Donating to Irresponsible or Bogus Charities

 
There are many times in our lives when we decide to donate to charities that need our money to do their good work. We may feel moved to donate to a charity that does research in a certain health area we are interested in. When someone we loved or respected dies, their family may ask for donations in lieu of flowers. Tragedies often trigger creation of new charities, as when a young person dies a tragic death.
 
Sometimes we want to donate simply because we are asked to. And, of course, the end of the year, during the holiday season, we consider our gifting at the same time we plan for completing the tax year.
 
There are three important planning steps to determining the right charities to donate to:
  1. Develop your giving goals.
     
  2. Make sure a charity is bona fide; that is, that it exists to truly help the organization or individual it is meant to help.
     
  3. Research the strength of a charity's fiscal responsibility and its track record for using donated money to address the goals that are of interest to you.
Here is information to help you with these steps:
 
1. How can you choose which charities to donate to?
The best way is to set some giving goals - from the type of charity to the scope of its reach. For example, do you want to donate to help research treatment options for a certain disease? or perhaps you want to help pay for medical care for a child who has a rare disease? Here is how to determine what kinds of charities you want to support.
 
2. Confirm the authenticity of the charity.
There are tens of thousands of charities that ask you for money, but not all of them are real charities, meaning, some are only set up to take your money, and not to truly help your cause. This is particularly true when a tragedy has taken place, such as those scammers who claimed they represented families who lost a child at Sandy Hook, or which claimed they were assisting people who lost their homes after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.
 
If a charity is new to you, or if you have received some sort of solicitation by phone or email, do not simply assume that it is safe to donate - or even to link to the charity from an email link or a FaceBook page or other social media. You might be giving money to someone who doesn't deserve it, and even worse, if it's online, you may pick up a computer virus, too.
 
Therefore, it's important to confirm that you are donating to a bona fide charity, one that is authentic and will use your money well.
 
In some cases you can know whether a charity is "real" by confirming its IRS or CRA status. But don't ask the charity, and don't simply accept a statement on its website since we know that not all websites have credible information.
 
Instead check with either of these resources to confirm a charity's authenticity:
  • The Better Business Bureau will help you search for a rating on a specific charity. You won't be able to search for a group of charities with one focus, but you can find out how individual, even local, charities are rated or whether the BBB accredits them.
3. How well does the charity address your goals?
 
There are two important aspects of how well a charity is run that will be of interest to us as donors.
First, take a look at its fiscal responsibility. You want to know how well run a charity is; whether they waste their money, or have fulfilled their promises.
 
The second is to be sure they focus on the aspects you think are important. We all have different reasons for donating, whether we're donating to health-related charities or the local high school band. When it comes to health-related charities, it's important to learn enough about them to be sure they work toward the same goals as you have.
 
For example, both my grandmother and my mother died of Alzheimer's disease, so I know I probably have some genetic tendency toward developing Alzheimer's myself. My goal, then, is for my donations to go toward research to find a cure, or at least a highly effective treatment.
 
But in doing my research for the best Alzheimer's focused charitable organization to donate to, I learned that they don't all do what they say they plan to do. In one case, I realized how much money and effort was going toward paying other organizations to fund raise for them. Others say they are focused on research, but in some cases I learned that less than 20% of their donations actually go toward research! Would you think twice about donating to a charity that said one thing but showed a track record of something else? I certainly did.

Here are two websites that can help you check both fiscal responsibility and a charity's real spending vs the focus it claims:
  • Charity Navigator allows you to search by the name of an organization or by the disease or condition you hope to support. It allows for some very deep research into the financials, efficiency, cost of administration and more. It also provides a list of all 4-star rated health-related charities (4-stars are its highest ranking.)
     
  • GuideStar collects information about non-profit organizations and makes it available to the public through its website.  Included is a charity evaluator, among many other offerings.
Bottom line:

You have worked hard to earn the money you are ready to donate. Be sure that when you give your money away, you do so in a considered fashion, to groups or individuals that will be good shepherds of your donation.

Sunday, 12 January 2014

N.A.R.K.Org.NZ the Obsolete Org!

 
From the Archives:.....http://web.archive.org/web/20120701000000*/http://www.nark.org.nz

 




Welcome To N.A.R.K.

"Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids"
 
"Our mission is to raise awareness of child abuse
in New Zealand and what you can do to help
prevent this in your community"
 
N.A.R.K. was founded by Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney after being branded a ‘nark’ for speaking to police about the death of Ngaruawahia baby Serenity Scott-Dinnington. Cherie turned this label around into the Nation of Advocates for the Rights of Kids and that is a label she wears proudly!
She started a facebook page, STOP Death by Abuse of OUR Children to raise awareness of New Zealand’s horrifying abuse record, put an end to the anti-nark culture and highlight what you can do in your community. Within a short time 11,000 people joined her campaign from mums and dads to politicians. Find out more..........
 

So how can we change this? By joining us in becoming a N.A.R.K.  

In New Zealand 10 children die every year by the hands of the people that are supposed to love them the most. Thousands more are confirmed to be suffering from abuse every year. It is our nation’s greatest shame. Find out how to support NARK click here.....

NARK ANGELS
Here you will find all the reasons why we do what we do, sadly this is a list of all the children who have died at the hands of those who were supposed to love them the most

...... they are our NARK angels
 

Event 3rd September 2011

Saturday, September 3 · 12:00pm - 3:00pm

Your Towns Local Memorial Statue or War Memorial or Wall

This memorial for our children who have died at the hands of someone who was supposed to be caring for them is simple, it does not cost BUT it will have huge impact.
I am asking you to spare 1 Toy/soft cuddly on September the 3rd and encourage everyone you can and know to do the same.

1 Toy to be placed at your towns local memorial statue or wall, in memory of our fallen heroes, the many children lost to child abuse.


Since our great soldiers passed there have been none other like them ever except for these Babies and I want a nation to accept awareness because for these children thats the very least we can be. AWARE.
Thank you and I really hope you can help.

 


 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney

Copyright © 2011 Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney NARK.ORG.NZ. Site Design by Jim Boswell

 From the Way back Archives: http://web.archive.org/web/www.nark.org.nz

Dated: October 1, 2011








Nark Website

Dated: January 6, 2014


 Nark Website Now 


























 Expired Domains Website Nark Info: Link here: nark.org.nz

Since doing  our researching and finding much information about this Org/Trust/Charity/Cause....etc
 
and that of its founder Cherie (Sweeney, Cherie Robinson. Smith. Kurarangi, Cherie Evangeline Marie Kara. Kura. Karaka etc........
 
Then finding out about the Chairperson Ms Roberta Karangaroa and the  interesting media article and Court hearing, (of course not to forget our own experience of her throughout Nark.Org.Nz)
 
.......and the elusive undercover, non-Transparent, defender of a scam Organization and its founder.   Pete George (political dreamer).We remain adamant that the Nark.Org.nz was a Scam from its beginnings.

Update of Mr Pete George: Sep 20, 2013   Mayoral Profile Page

Makes sense now!
 
 
Cherie was quite adamant on making profit from the very beginning.  Sadly quite the opportunist, that woman. 
 
To the many good people who did the hard work, put in the long hours and organized  within Nark as (Cherie and Roberta where never there to help),  you should be commended congratulated on all your efforts and  on your truly wonderful "mana" in helping address the Child abuse issue in NZ.  You put all your hearts into it and you did wonderful work.
 
These good people (not knowing who Cherie really was/is), were greatly mistreated and threatened, continuously bullied, and accused of things (they never did) by the these two opportunist  women Cherie and Ms Roberta Karangaroa. 
 
Its quite deplorable and saddening how the good people were treated.
 
The unprofessional behaviour of both these woman is a disgrace, but then at the end of the day it was always about Profiteering and Media exposure with them. 
 
What ever became of the good people who left Nark.Org.Nz after the walkout in January 2012? (a large portion of the Nark.org.nz board and those who were members of the Org).
 
They have gone onto   establish their own Registered Children's Charities in NZ and have great support all around the country. They continue to this day, that is true Mana, a lovely group of people.
 
What happened after the walkout regarding Cherie, Roberta and Pete George and the Nark.Org.NZ fiasco?
 
Nothing.
 
No registration, no evidence of helping the Child Abuse issue, no evidence of anything  for that matter.

It seems when they were exposed as to their true agenda, (Profiting) they suddenly vanished.  For a founder who is on a "Mission" to raise awareness of child abuse
in New Zealand, there has been nothing forthcoming from either the Nark Org or that of its founder.......
Ms Cherie and Roberta were certainly on a mission, a mission of lies and scamming and ripping off the Public of NZ.


On a different note, Ms Cherie Sweeney sent us a lovely message via email, seems to still be using her Mobster Email address "maorified" to this day......

Dated: Aug 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM and Nov 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM






















So apparently many people are helping Cherie Sweeney with her business and her Nark Cause, would love to see that evidence Ms Sweeney, I doubt any would. And yet again she plays the "victim" role as so many times in the past. Sorry Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa YOU have been found out!

This is to keep all aware, that scams are quite prevalent in NZ.  Please ensure that when you give your money to a cause, make sure it is registered and get receipts. 

 Also do a background check of the Charity and founder if your not sure.  There are many people out there like Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa who are willing to take your hard earned cash and will never leave a paper trail.  These people are opportunists, they get everyone else to do the hard yards while they sit back and reap the benefits (in this case money and publicity) and its you who are directly paying for their "lavish" lifestyles. 

Make sure you know where your money is going too, and please be vigilant about these kind of scams around NZ.

Signing off

NZ

 

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Roberta Karangaroa N.A.R.K Org.NZ Chairperson Scammer

An article from Stuff.co.nz regarding Ms Roberta Karangaroa's interesting  governance skills, regarding a Maori Land Trust she was meant to provide "governance training" for it's Trustees ...


Ms Roberta Karangaroa

Roberta Karangaroa, now known as Roberta Matiaha

 

Link is here: Roberta Karangaroa

Trustee wilfully overpaid her husband, judge finds
SIMON DAY

Last updated 05:00 05/08/2013

A Hawke's Bay woman accused of plundering thousands of dollars from a Maori Land Trust to pay for her wedding and to bankroll family and friends has resigned as a trustee.
 
The accusations against Sharon Edwards-Walker are revealed in a Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She was alleged to have made big overpayments from the trust, including more than $120,000 to her husband and his family. She also appointed a friend to provide "governance training" - the friend promptly withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use, the court said.
 
While Edwards-Walker and her family were allegedly receiving more than their entitlement in trust dividend payments, other members of the trust received no dividend at all.
 
Edwards-Walker was administrator of Te Raniera Huango Trust, which administers three blocks of Maori Freehold Land with 35 beneficial owners. She was responsible for paying out trust money.
 
Among the accusations of misappropriating money were $6500 to pay for her wedding in 2009. She also allegedly paid $699 on more than one occasion for medical insurance for her husband.
She also "wilfully overpaid" her husband and his siblings from trust dividends, according to the Maori Land Court judgment.
 
She claimed she had been bullied into the payments by her husband and others.
 
The judgment said Edwards-Walker approached a friend, Roberta Karangaroa, to provide governance training to the trustees. Karangaroa persuaded the trustees to add her as a signatory to the trust's accounts. 
 
The judgment said Karangaroa then withdrew $12,000 from the trust for her own use. After a complaint to police, $9500 was recovered.  
 
Judge Layne Harvey said that there could be "no justification" for  Edwards-Walker's conduct and in the absence of any alternative evidence, he concluded that "Edwards-Walker has abused her position as a trustee for personal gain, has placed herself in a conflict of interest position, and has made an unauthorised profit from her office".
 
On the basis of the trust's current level of dividend payments, it would take more than 20 years for the people who had been overpaid to restore those funds to the trust, according to the judgment.
 
Judge Harvey said that, in the absence of any "tenable defence", "there has been significant maladministration of the trust's finances, if not outright misappropriation", with the amount of money involved "as surprising as it is unacceptable".
 
The breaches of general trust law principles were sufficient to warrant Edwards-Walker's removal as a trustee. Judge Harvey said when he put this to Edwards-Walker, she chose to resign.          
The court directed the remaining trustees to obtain legal advice as to what recovery and enforcement actions may be appropriate should the allegations concerning the misappropriation of trust funds be proven. Ms Edwards-Walker was given two months to file a response to the allegations.
- © Fairfax NZ News
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 2011 Mark Mansfield made an application to the Maori Land Courts regarding non-transparency and missing monies with-in the Te Raniera Huango Trust. Link is from the justice.govt.nz website.

Note we have only included the relevant Paragraphs pertaining to Ms Roberta Karangaroa, as she is our subject of concern, regarding Nark.Org.Nz (apart from Ms Sweeney obviously). You can read the full complaint and also that of the judges ruling on the link below.

Full document here: Maori Land Courts, justice.govt.nz

Dated on the 28th March 2013





 







 
Continuation and Judgement: From justice.govt.nz

Hearing was on the 4 July 2013 in Hastings and Judge Ruling on the 5 July 2013 

[1] On 2 November 2011 Mark Mansfield filed proceedings per s238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 seeking financial information from the trustees of Te Raniera Huango Trust. He claimed that they had failed to hold general meetings, provide annual accounts and be accountable to the beneficial owners.

More seriously Mr Mansfield alleged that the trustees had "embezzled" trust funds and accordingly had to be brought before the Court to account for this conduct. I note that Mr Mansfield had made these claims of lack of financial accountability against the trustees in 2009 and the proceedings had been before the Court since then.

[19] Then there is the matter of the $12,000 taken from the trust’s account by Roberta Karangaroa. In my earlier judgment I directed the trustees to recover the outstanding $2,500 from Karangaroa following her repayment of $9,500. It now emerges that Ms Karangaroa claims she has returned that amount to Mrs Edwards-Walker directly, which the latter denies. 

[20] It will be remembered that Ms Karangaroa had been approached to provide "governance training" to the trustees at the request of Mrs Edwards-Walker. At the hearing yesterday Mrs Edwards-Walker confirmed that she had known Ms Karangaroa for many years and had asked her to provide "governance training" to the trustees.

At the previous hearing the trustees accepted they had been persuaded by Ms Karangaroa to add her, a non-owner and a non-beneficiary of the land, to become a signatory for the trust using the pretext that having siblings as trustees signing cheques was not best practice.

 Ironically, as mentioned, Ms Karangaroa then proceeded to withdraw $12,000 from the trust for her own personal use with $9,500 recovered from her following a complaint to the Police

[21] Ms Edwards-Walker subsequently claimed that the trust’s then bankers had paid the money out to Ms Karangaroa on only one signature and that on her return from overseas Mrs Edwards-Walker had gone to the bank to sign a withdrawal slip to approve the payment after the fact.

The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming. Indeed, Mrs Edwards-Walker claimed that whenever arrangements were made with Ms Karangaroa to hold a meeting she was invariably unavailable at the last minute.

[22] As I mentioned in my previous judgment the trustees are liable to repay this amount if it could not be recovered from Ms Karangaroa. As it was Mrs Edwards-Walker who signed the withdrawal or payment slip, and without the approval of the trustees, I find that she is responsible to repay this amount to the trust. That said, it may now be appropriate for the trustees to put the matter in the hands of a collection agency, in the absence of either repayment or a tenable defence from Ms Karangaroa.

Mr Mark Mansfield's compliant was legally justifiable.

[38] The present application was precipitated by allegations made against the trustees by Mark Mansfield. His original complaints concerned the lack of information available to beneficiaries, lack of meetings and lack of annual accounts. On the face of the evidence before the Court it would appear that many of Mr Mansfield’s concerns have been borne out and his complaints justified.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we can see throughout this whole matter, Ms Roberta Karangaroa and her "governance skills" along with dipping into another Trust's money, is of particular concern.  The similarities' a quite striking, as to Ms Roberta Karaangaoa's elusiveness in (being contactable/available) when $12,000 was taken from the trust’s account

From the post above:

"The trustees had been directed to use their best endeavours to contact Ms Karangaroa to give her opportunity to respond to the allegations that had been made against her. To date no such response has been forthcoming."

Both Ms Cherie Sweeney and Ms Roberta Karangaroa were very good at becoming unavailable through out our experiences with Nark.Org.Nz, on the Community Group Page.  When they eventually managed to grace page from time to time, they were always using excuses why they were away and that their time was limited. 
 
Also Cherie's continuous, "personal financial burdens" that were endless. Once questions of missing monies were brought to light, they totally avoided answers to our concerns.
 
Yes, Ms Roberta Karangaroa is well experienced in "spinning the truth".  The only thing is both Cherie and Roberta keep contradicting themselves.

Now if this was going in November 2011, we certainly have more knowledge now on the Ms Roberta' background and her love for Trusts, Money, and certainly trying to obtain it paper free, obligation free, question free, evidence free and most importantly..... tax free! This is certainly the case with Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney, included.   

 From the Charites.govt.nz Website.....

http://www.register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/Search

The Charities that Ms Roberta Karangaroa established. These ones are registered, however she is involved with many that aren't, ie Nark, Personal land trusts among others. We learnt along this journey that just because a Trust, Charties, Org etc aren't funded; certainly doesn't mean they don't get huge donations which are conveniently unaccounted for.  The many events that Ms Karangaroa and Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney organized, brought in huge amounts. 
Officer NameCharity NameRegistration
NumberStatusDate
Roberta KarangaroaNational Te Koru Puawai Charitable TrustCC31518Registered23/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaRiverslea Tu Tangata Incorporated Charity TrustCC31450Registered22/09/2008
Roberta KarangaroaHawkes Bay Community Law Centre TrustCC37364Registered3/02/2009
 
Roberta Karangaroa was also a trustee for the Maatangireia Trust. Non existent currently.



.






























Roberta certainly has many years experience in "governance" for trusts etc.

 *Interesting how, the moment a complaint was made to the Police, Ms Roberta Karangaroa coughed up most of it. 


Ms Roberta and Cherie are experienced over many years in creating, hui's, meetings, media, events, getting funding (including Government funding) for their scam ideas
 
They have numerously used "heart-breaking" issues in NZ to persuade many to donate to their scams.   So, it's certainly of no surprise that Ms Roberta Karangaroa (currently of the Riverslea Trust, Hastings, among other trusts) would be quite persuasive in getting money from Trusts, she can certainly talk her way of a paper bag...... 

Another interesting  point is, when all this was going on....... Pete George of Your Nz, (Nark.Org.NZ, Board member) still supported them.  All their spinning, lies, abusiveness toward members and non-accountability of where monies were?









Pete George Party Your Dunedin Standing for Dunedin City Council - Central Ward Dunedin City Mayor (dreamer)


Pete George, certainly has a way with words.  He constantly bleats out "Transparency" but never follows through with that word...... Pete you really need to listen to yourself.  You've certainly never been "Transparent" by any means.

 Not a good political move Pete George.

So being that we are the NZ Public, we  decided to do our Civic duty, and pay Pete a visit on his, "Pete George for Dunedin Mayor" Facebook page he created September last year.......quite a catchy title, "Good luck with that Pete, go live that dream!"



 

And after 10 hours.... our message was removed,  and he's suddenly  laying low.  Pete is about as Transparent as a Kiwi made Gum Boot!  



 
 
Yep, this explains it then...
 
This is information for the New Zealand Public, by the New Zealand Public. We are here to keep NZ informed on this serious issue regarding the Scam Nark.Org,nz and also the two woman who have endeavoured with their "causes, pleas, hui's, events...etc". Purely profit driven and for so long and had gone unnoticed until now.

Cherie Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.Nz and Roberta Kararangi of the Riverslea Trust, are quite probably two of the best scammers in NZ.



Mrs Cherie Kara Kurarangi Sweeney of Nark.Org.NZ

Saturday, 26 January 2013

Good Narks and Nastiness of Pete George from Your NZ


Pete George a Nark Board Member from its beginnings.  I wasn't going to post on this, as it would be just fueling the abuse, hurled at us by Mr George's postings.   But this is very much part, of this story (he is also a Nark Board Member). He is also a political blogger, a candidate for Dunedin with United Future, and a great business man.

So we will touch lightly on this subject, about Nark and its inconsistencies.

Many people who were with Nark, never knew who were the Board Members, no transparency of monies donated, missing monies from Nark, the T-Shirt debacle and basically lack of Transparancy with anything to do with Nark and its founder.

When our questions to Cherie and NARK were not answered (8th January 2012), with "Evidence" and people where being removed from the Nark Private Page, for simply asking questions.  People started to become very concerned, as many were given the "run around", no proof  of where peoples monies had gone to? And the many inconsistencies that followed.  A month or so later (on the 16th of February), we began a Facebook Page, Cherie Nark NZ (Show NZ the Money!), after concerns where raised to Ms Cherie's "Mortgage Plea",

We found an interesting note: Mysterious Note for NZ?

Also an Email: Strange Email to Ms Cherie?

The lack of "Mortgage" evidence that Ms Sweeney said, she would provide the next day.  Apart from (a copy of a statement of the funds donated), we found it a real concern.  That night, we found a lot of inconsistencies with what Ms Sweeney was telling the people on her "event".

The link of that Plea:


A total lack of Transparency with that "Plea", just like with the Nark "monies donated" by the NZ public, to her Nark Org for the most important child abuse issue, which is so prevalent in NZ.
More information on this link:


So many questions needed answers, and we began our Facebook Page.  From the beginning of our Facebook page, we had been attacked, abused, bullied and removed.  All of this because the Public needed to know, what was going on with this Org and why we were not getting any "evidenced" answers or responses from Cherie and the Nark Board.   The public themselves (on our Facebook Page), were having their profile pages attacked,  reported etc..for simply asking questions or commenting on posts.   We knew as the Public, we must look more into this issue.

We found "Evidence" of Ms Cherie's previous lifestyle and also confirmed that Mr and Ms Cherie Sweeney are still members of a well known gang in NZ.   When posting our "Evidence" up on our page, they were reported and removed.  We also found "Evidence" of Ms Cherie's business ventures and Charity Events she had previously managed.  She has been an actor, model, worked in Media (her business) and also does sponsorship and funding.  These were all kept from the NZ Public. Why? We do not know. But when the media got wind of our page  and two articles were published:



Ms Sweeney and Nark responded on Voxy.

These were the first responses, we were given from Cherie and Nark, since the 8th of  January, which many members, were removed with no answers.
You will see our findings contradict, what Ms Cherie Sweeney and Nark have said via Voxy.

NZ public are not naive, check our response link here: Falsely Accused?

Back to the subject of Mr Pete George.  Some of us, did not know who he was, also that he was a Board Member of Nark.  He posted his first public response about us on the Stop Abuse page:

It's been sad to see a few wobbles and wobblies in the Nark and wider anti abuse circles. While nearly everyone has had the best of intentions there have been frustrations and grizzles, some justified.Unfortunately some of you may have also seen abuse and accusations, some of which have escalated recently to a level that's very sad and sick. I think most of us realise this is totally at odds with what we are trying to achieve in reducing abuse.
I stuck with Nark through some rough times because I believed in people and ideals and hoped things could be sorted out. I think that things have tidied up as well as they could be and are on track to make a difference for children.
Being put in the spotlight has been particularly challenging for Cherie, and it has attracted a few knockers. That's tough for someone who had the guts to stand up and set an example where standing up is badly needed.
I'm still on the interim board of Nark and am familiar with what has been happening, internally and around Nark. I want to say that I have full confidence in Cherie and what she's done. From what I've seen and know I believe she has acted with honourable intent in the best interests of this cause, at significant personal cost. She deserves the respect most people give her.
We need to be positive, be respectful of others, and do what we're here for, whatever we can to help our kids.
Like ·  · Share
  • Cherie Stopdeath Byabuseofourchildren and 60 others like this.

    • Megan Murphy it's amazing that anyone puts their head above the parapet when it means getting slammed so publicly. good on you, Cherie.
      7 March at 06:56 · Like ·  11

    • Vanessa Caseley Absolutely huge respect for Cherie. A courageous move to put herself out there and stand up for our children.
      7 March at 06:59 · Like ·  12

    • Ananda Callaghan We have some among us who put ego above truth, racial defensiveness above children, and hatred above love. Ignore them and stay focused. Join STOP CHILD ABUSE IN NEW ZEALAND/AOTEOROA and KIA KAHA NZ CXX
      7 March at 07:16 · Like ·  7

    • Tasha Beazley Kia kaha tonu! anythn 2stop child abuse is a good thing!!
      7 March at 07:20 · Like ·  3

    • Brian Gallagher I am amazed that in the matter of stopping child abuse that ALL people are not united in this cause. GO Cherie and GO! Nark.May the power be with you!
      7 March at 07:39 · Like ·  6

    • Renee Stone We need to stand united in the cause not pick apart those leading the charge. What sort of message are we sending if we are picking Cherie apart when she put her neck out in the beginning and spoke out when no one else had the guts??
      7 March at 08:09 · Like ·  3

    • Karen Goa Cherie, you have my utmost respect. Any social media site always attracts some people who don't respect the intent and only want to push their own barrow. Please ignore it - hard I know - and let's get on with making changes to stop child abuse.
      7 March at 08:16 · Like ·  1

    • Whakamana Tangata ‎'...what is true of th individual wil b 2morro true of th whole nation if individuals wil but refuse 2 lose heart & hope...' Ghandi - do not lose your heart or your hope Cherie... sendn much kaha & respect...
      7 March at 08:36 · Like ·  1

    • STOP Death by Abuse of our Children Sorry, I didn't notice when I post here it's under NARK and not my name - I'm Pete George and thanks for the support :)

      7 March at 08:42 · Like ·  7

    • Rebecca Jones It makes me proud to be a NZer with strong and courageous people like Cherie who have made a stand. Sad to hear (but not surprised) that there's been some hassles on the way. Cherie has been strong for the rest of us, maybe now it's time to be strong for her - and with her :)
      7 March at 08:54 · Like ·  5

    • Megan Burnett Cherie is amazing and I support her 100%...
      7 March at 08:57 · Like ·  2

    • Marie Kirkwood Cherie, and Nark, have my total support. Cherie you are an amazing woman; I admire your strength, courage and kaupapa. Pete, hang in there - you're needed. :D ♥
      7 March at 15:55 · Like ·  1

    • Leanne Tahu Dont let a hand full of peoples negitivity take the focus away from saving the kids. Stay positive and lets put our energy into saving our kids from the ugly people
      7 March at 17:12 · Like ·  3

    • Julie Wilson Lynch mobs are still alive and kicking. They are an embarrassment to themselves. All the best to the NARK community. You will overcome. Love is stronger than hate.
      7 March at 21:43 · Like ·  2

    • Wendy Mathews Cherie I thankyou for your stand and I am so sorry that in doing so you have been harrassed like this from within. Those people only do so much damage to the work of NARK and with continued unity and bearing all this flak together alongside Cherie we will not stop doing what is right. We will not SHUT UP will not put up with Violence Abuse or Worse. The cause is more important than individuals own personal agendas and Cherie I will stand with you, I believe in your integrity, if I did not I would not be a part of this group.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We had been vilified publicly, for want of answers. Also some of the members who had seen our evidence, of Nark and Ms Cherie we posted on our Facebook page and had withdrew their support for both the founder and her Org, were vilified also.  This issue, is NOT about stopping the support or help toward the Child Abuse Cause, which is so desperately required in NZ.  This is about Transparency of a founder and the Nark Organization, which are both, meant to be representing this Cause.  Neither have been Transparent to date. Why? Again we are still waiting for "evidenced" answers on that.

We also posted this thread in our notes on our Facebook page for the public, which was removed.
Next Mr Pete George, starting attacking the public on his Your NZ blog site.


There are other posts he wrote over the next few days.  We had publicly asked him to come on to our page to help us understand what was going on.  He never did, but persisted in running to his blog for updates about NZ needing "evidenced" answers.  There is also a post from a guest suggesting our page had to do with a certain "book" of sorts? We found that interesting, and also a distraction from the issue.  During his posts he had said:

Confronting the real abuse

BY PETE GEORGE
 I have been witnessing an online campaign of abuse, false and unsubstantiated accusation, character assassination, misrepresentation of identities, attempts to shut down speech, attempts to shut down organisations. It has ranged from annoying to disgraceful.
And that’s not the worst of it. Others have linked some of this to criminal and mental health histories, death threats, even incest. This is associated with people who present themselves as working against abuse – some of them are the worst of abusers.
There’s only a few people actively doing this, but they also draw in others to support them, using (and abusing) vulnerable people to promote their own agendas.
I and others have gathered evidence of all of these things, and have established identities behind it. There’s a lot of evidence.  Here’s some of what’s on the surface...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We had much questions for Mr Pete George: Why was he accusing us of false accusations, when we had posted all the "evidence" we claimed.  In regards to shutting down speech, it was actually our page, which was shut down 4 times for finding some "evidenced" answers to questions ourselves, as none was forth coming from Cherie and the Nark Board.  The most disgraceful part is, that we found disturbing evidence, of Cherie and her Husband's past and current lifestyle.  The "Voxy" article confirmed for us ( the NZ public), that things were certainly wrong.

Mr Pete George had said our page is..." linked to criminals, mental health histories, death threads even incest?  This is associated with people who present themselves as working against abuse - some of them are the worst abusers...."

Quite appalling accusations from someone in his position.  Yet, he is prepared to point fingers at anyone and everyone who refuses, to be bullied by Cherie and Nark. Purely distracting from the issue at hand.  He also must of forgotten, to look at the history, and current situation of Ms Cherie and Husband.  Also, the previous criminal activity, regarding that.  We found it interesting that all his claims of abuse, attacks, threats and maliciousness, nasty accusations were actually directed at us (and yes, we also have "evidence" of that too).

We also asked Mr Pete George: With all this mud-slinging and trying to dig up dirt on innocent people on our public page, where does he find time to help with the Child Abuse cause, that he is involved with, being a Nark Board Member?  No answers to our questions, but he did stop his abusive writings toward the NZ Public on his blog site.

We do wonder, what his motivations are in attacking the public, for want of deserving "evidenced" answers to the relevant questions.  Ms Cherie made it public for her Nark Events, and fund-raising and the trusting public have given freely, but when requiring accountability and wanting transparency of the monies donated?, Cherie and NARK seem to be silent and attack the public,  for these serious questions....

From a very concerned public member, who had faced the abuse from Cherie and NARK, also Mr Pete George: 

As soon as you start asking questions, you are then attacked, abused, vilified  As far as I am aware, I have not been nasty in asking questions but have received nothing but evasiveness in return. Still no answers. What did astound me was the attack from a totally different direction through a PM and now when I read through posts I wonder why.....?

The NZ public who give so freely and kindly to any "charity trust" or other, please be aware that the donations you give are actually going to the cause.  Also, please do some research into finding a registered Charity, at least you know that they are a legal entity and therefore are required to be transparent.